期刊文献+

手工计数法与血细胞分析仪测定血小板的比较 被引量:8

Comparison of manual counting method and blood cell analyzer in determination of platelet
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价Dinana-5型全自动血细胞分析仪对血小板测定的临床应用价值。方法使用血细胞分析仪和显微镜,严格按规定操作检测标本得出结果。结果血小板数〈20×10^9/L,和〈50×109/L,及〉400×109/L时两种计数方法差异均有统计学意义(P〉0.05);当血小板数为(50~100)×10^9/L时,(100~300)×10^9/L,(300~400)×10^9/L时两种方法间无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论血细胞分析仪对血小板计数明显降低及明显增多时,应用手工法计做重复检测,提高结果准确性。 Objective To study the clinical value of detecting platelet by using Dinana- 5 automatic blood cell analyzer. Methods Using blood cell analyzer and microscope detect the number of platelet in strict accordance with the provisions of the operation. Results When Platelet number was less than 20 × 109/ L,less than 50 × 10^9/ L and more than 400 × 109/ L,the differences of the two methods were statistically significant( P〉0. 05). When the platelet number was between 50 and 100 × 10^9/ L,or 100- 300 × 10^9/ L,the differences of the two methods had no statistical significance( P〉0. 05). Conclusions When the blood cell analyzer for platelet count was significantly decreased or increased,the application of manual method can improve the accuracy of results.
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2015年第1期77-78,共2页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 全自动血细胞分析仪 血小板 显微镜 Fully automatic blood cell analyzer Platelet Microscope
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献21

共引文献30

同被引文献64

引证文献8

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部