期刊文献+

高中校内考试结果处理的问题表征与改进路径

Problem Representation and Improvement Path of High School Examination Results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对高中校内考试结果进行处理是学生自诊所需,教师教学所要,家校合作所求。通过对国内文献的梳理及对高中校内考试现状的调研发现,目前高中校内考试结果处理存在考试数据处理简单化、考试结果成因分析模糊化、考试结果反馈单一化、基于考试数据分析的教育研究稀缺化等方面的问题。针对上述问题提出考试数据翔实化处理、结果成因多方位探析、考试结果多元化反馈、挖掘考试数据开展学术研究等改进路径。 Analyzing high school examination results is the needs of the students’ self diagnosis,teacher’s teaching and parent- school cooperative petitions. Through reviewing the domestic literatures and surveying current status in high schools,the author finds following problems existing: the test data processing and examination result feedback are simplified,analysis of blurred exam results is genetic,few education researches are based on test data analysis. To solve these problems, the author puts forward following improvement paths: detailed test data processing,comprehensive analysis of the cause,diversified feedback of test results and mining test data to conduct academic research.
出处 《考试研究》 2015年第1期87-91,共5页 Examinations Research
关键词 校内考试 结果处理 问题表征与改进路径 School-inside Test Result Processing Problem Representation and Improvement Path
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1辛涛.新课程背景下的学业评价:测量理论的价值[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(1):56-61. 被引量:53
  • 2李光明.(2012).探索考试评价,促进高考改革.北京频范大学学报,增刊,5 -9.
  • 3Cessaroli,M. E. (2004). Using hierarchical multidimensional i-tem response theory to estimate augmented subscores. Paperpresented at the annual meeting of the National Council onMeasurement in Education. San Diego, CA.
  • 4Junker, B. W. , & Sijtsma, K. ( 2001 ). Cognitive assessmentmodels with few assumptions, and connections with nonpara-metric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measure-ment ,25,25S -272,Kelley,T. L. (1927). The interpretation of educational measure-ments. New York:Word Book.
  • 5Leighton, J. P. , Gierl, M. J.,& Hunka, S. M. (2004). The at-tribute hierarchy model for cognitive assessment : A variationon Tatsuoka s rule - space approach. Journal of EducationalMeasurement ,41,205 -237.
  • 6Roussos,L. A. ,DiBello,L. V.,Stout,W. F. ,Hartz,S. M.,Hen-son,R. A. ,& TempIin,J. H. (2007). The fusion model skillsdiagnostic system. In J. Leighton & M. Gierl (Ed. ) ,Cognitivediagnostic assessment for education : Theory and applications.New York : Cambridge University Press.
  • 7Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evalua-tion. In G. F. Madaus,M. S. Scriven, & D, L. Stufflebeam(Eds. ) , Evaluation models : viewpoints on educational and hu-man services evaluation^ pp. 117 - 141). Boston : Kluwer - Ni-jhoff Publising.
  • 8Tatsuoka, K. K. ( 1983 ). Rule space : An approach for dealingwith misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal ofEducational Measurement ,20,345 -354.
  • 9Wainer,H. , Vevea, J. L. , Camacho, F. , Reeve, B. , Rosa, K.,Nelson,L.,Swygert, K.,& Thissen, D. (2001). Augmentedscores—u borrowing strengthn to compute scores based onsmall numbers of items. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer( Eds.),Test Scoring( pp. 343 - 387 ). Mahwah,NJ : Lawrence ErlbaumAssociates.
  • 10Yen,W. M. ( 1987). A Bayesian/IRT index of objective perform-ance. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychometric So-ciety. Montreal.

共引文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部