期刊文献+

卫生资源优先次序分配的影响因素研究:基于重庆卫生行政人员态度调查 被引量:1

Studying on the factors to influence the priority of health resources allocation based on survey of the attitude of health administrators in Chongqing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:摸清重庆卫生行政人员关于卫生资源优先次序分配的影响因素。方法 2013年2月~2014年2月,通过likert问卷调查重庆市卫生行政人员关于卫生资源优先次序分配的态度。结果:摸清卫生资源优先次序分配相关程序公平、决策水平、利益相关方、政策行政环境四个方面的影响因素。结论:被调查对象对公众参与赋权仍有顾虑,对市场力量介入持更宽容态度,而对媒体、学术力量、公众的重视程度有待加强,被调查者自身的决策水平尚待提高;卫生行政环境有利于展开卫生资源优先次序分配。 Objective To study the factors to influence the priority of health resources allocation in Chongqing. Methods The attitude towards the priority of health resources allocation of health administrators in Chongqing was surveyed by Likert questionnaire from 2013 to 2014. Results The main influencing factors were obtained from four aspects of fair process, capability of decision, stakeholders and policy environment. Conclusion The health administrators kept pending on the empowerment, while tolerated support from the market. Their attitudes towards media, academic and the public should be strengthened. And their capability of decision-making needs to be further improved.
作者 峗怡
出处 《中国卫生事业管理》 北大核心 2015年第1期51-53,共3页 Chinese Health Service Management
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"卫生资源优先次序分配的伦理机制及评价研究"(编号:13CZX082)
关键词 卫生资源分配 优先次序分配 决策 影响因素 health resources allocation priority decision-making influencing factor.
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献35

  • 1The World Health Report 2000. Health systems:Improving per- formance [R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2000.
  • 2Everybody' s business:Strengthening health systems to im-prove heahh outcomes : WHO' s framework for action [ R ]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2007.
  • 3Bouckaert G, Peters B, Verhoest K. The coordination of public sector organizations-shifting patterns of public man- agement [ M]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
  • 4Thompson G, Frances J, Levacic R, et al. Markets, hierar- chies and networks:The coordination of social life [ M ]. London: Sage, 1991.
  • 5Ouchi W. A conceptual framework for the design of optimal control mechanisms [ J ]. Management Science, 1979, 25 : 833 -849.
  • 6Braithwaite I, Drahos P. Global business regulation [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 7USAID. Health governance : concepts, experience, and pro- gramming options [R]. Bethesda:USAID, 2008.
  • 8Beer S. Decision and control:the meaning of operational re- search and management cybernetics [ M ] . London: John Wiley & Sons, 1966.
  • 9Osborne D, Gaebler T. Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector [ M ]. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
  • 10Systems thinking for health systems strengthening [ R ]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.

共引文献12

同被引文献18

  • 1A.M.Buyx.Personal Responsibility for Health as a Rationing Criterion:Why We Don’t Like It and Why Maybe We Should[J].Journal of Medical Ethics,2008,34(12):871-874.
  • 2R.Dworkin.Sovereign Virtue:The Theory and Practice of Equality[M].Cambridge and Massachusetts:Harvard University Press,2000.
  • 3A.W.Cappelen.Responsibility in Health Care:A Liberal Egalitarian Approach[J].Journal of Medical Ethics,2005,31(8):476-80.
  • 4G.Cohen.On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice[J].Ethics,1989,99:906-44.
  • 5Elizabeth S.Anderson.What Is the Point of Equality?[J].Ethics,1999,109(2):287-337.
  • 6Richard J.Arneson.Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare[G]//L.P.Pojman,R.Westmoreland.Equality:Selected Readings.New York and Oxford:Oxford University Press,1997:229-241.
  • 7Derek Parfit.Equality and Priority[J].Ratio(New Series),1997,10(3):202-221.
  • 8J.G.S.Wilson.Health Inequities[G]//A.Dawson.Public Health Ethics:Key Concepts and Issues in Policy and Practice.Cambridge and New York:Cambridge University Press,2011:211-230.
  • 9Norman Daniels.Just Health Care[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1985.
  • 10Richard J.Arneson.Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism[J].Ethics,2000,110(2):339-349.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部