期刊文献+

不同解冻方法对牛肉品质的影响 被引量:19

Effect of Different Thawing Methods on the Quality of Beef
原文传递
导出
摘要 为获得较为理想的解冻方法,通过对腌制剂解冻法和低温高湿变温解冻法的结合与调整,设计了8种解冻方法,研究不同解冻方法对牛肉品质的影响。结果表明,低温高湿解冻法的解冻时间与对照组比没有显著差异,亮度L值极显著高于其他处理(p<0.01);低温低湿解冻法L值、蒸煮损失率和嫩度极显著低于对照组(p<0.01);腌制剂解冻法(常温)所用解冻时间与其他处理相比最短;腌制剂解冻法(低温)、腌制剂浸湿解冻法(低温高湿、低温变湿)的嫩度极显著低于对照组(p<0.01);腌制剂浸湿包装袋组合解冻法和低温变湿解冻法的红度a值显著高于对照组(p<0.05),剪切力、汁液流失率极显著低于对照组(p<0.01)。采用腌制剂浸湿包装袋组合解冻法和低温变湿解冻法在冻藏牛肉解冻后的感官品质要优于其他解冻法。 The effect of eight kinds of thawing method, which were combined and adjusted salting preparation thawing method and low-variable temperature and high relative humidity thawing method, on the quality of frozen beef were investigated. The results showed that there was no difference on the thawing time, however the L value was higher under the low temperature with humidity thawing method than that under other methods (p〈0.01). The L value, rate of cooking loss and tenderness of low temperature and humidity thawing method were very significantly lower than the control (p〈0.01 ). Salting preparation thawing method (normal temperature) used less time than any other treamaents. The tenderness of salting preparation thawing method (low temperature) and salting preparation soaking thawing method were significantly lower than the control. A value of the salting preparation soakingpacking bags thawing and low-variable temperature and transform the humidity thawing had a great significance with the control, but the shearing force, drip loss had a converse result (p〈0.01). In conclusion, the sensor quality of the salting preparation soakingpacking bags thawing and low-variable temperature and transform the humidity thawing were better than that of other methods.
作者 邸静 靳烨
出处 《食品工业》 北大核心 2015年第1期174-177,共4页 The Food Industry
基金 国家十二五科技支撑计划 内蒙古牧区生产生态生活优化保障技术集成与示范2010bad13b02
关键词 解冻方法 牛肉 品质 thawing methods beef quality
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1李银,孙红梅,张春晖,白跃宇,王振宇.牛肉解冻过程中蛋白质氧化效应分析[J].中国农业科学,2013,46(7):1426-1433. 被引量:43
  • 2XIONG Y L. Gelation of beef heart surimi as affected by antioxidants [J]. Journal of Food Science, 1996(61): 707 -711.
  • 3MARTINAUD A, MERCIER Y, MARINOVA P, et al. Comparison of oxidative processes on myofibrillar proteins from beef during maturationand by different model oxidation systems[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45: 2481-2487.
  • 4DECKER E A, FAUSTMAN C, LOPEZ-BOTE C J, et al. Protein oxidation and implications for muscle food quality [M]. In Antioxidants in Muscle Foods, 2000: 3-23.
  • 5高红伟.速冻原料肉解冻方法的改进[J].肉类研究,1997,11(1):33-34. 被引量:3
  • 6张春晖,李侠,李银,孙红梅,张德权,贾伟,穆国锋.低温高湿变温解冻提高羊肉的品质[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(6):267-273. 被引量:65
  • 7管永庆.肉类解冻新技术——高湿低温节能型解冻[J].肉类工业,2011(1):14-15. 被引量:5
  • 8LYTRAS G N, GEILESKEY A, KING R D, et al. Effect of mmcle type, salt and pH on cooked meat haemoprotein formation in lamb and beef[J]. Meat Science, 1999(2): 189-1940.
  • 9Honikel K O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristic of meat[J]. Meat Science, 1998, 49(4): 447-457.
  • 10中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T9695.5-2008肉与肉制品pH测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2009.

二级参考文献144

共引文献240

同被引文献168

引证文献19

二级引证文献120

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部