期刊文献+

应用PCR-DGGE技术比较绵羊瘤胃、网胃、瓣胃和皱胃菌群的多样性 被引量:8

A Comparison Study on Bacteria Diversity of Rumen,Reticulum,Omasum and Abomasum from Sheep Using PCR-DGGE Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究采用聚合酶链式反应-变性梯度凝胶电泳(PCR-DGGE)技术结合DGGE图谱条带的克隆和测序比较了绵羊瘤胃、网胃、瓣胃和皱胃菌群的多样性,同时对菌群进行了聚类分析和主成分分析。结果表明:绵羊瘤胃、网胃、瓣胃和皱胃内容物DGGE图谱的平均条带数分别为18、13、16和15条;瘤胃和瓣胃内菌群的多样性指数、均匀度和丰富度均较高,分别为2.83、0.79、17.00和2.82、0.79、16.80,而网胃和皱胃内容物较低,分别为2.52、0.70、12.60和2.73、0.76、15.40;聚类分析结果显示不同胃的内容物菌群具有一定差异,但不同动物个体相同胃的内容物相似性系数均高于0.63;PCR-DGGE图谱中测序的条带大多数归为拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)和厚壁菌门(Firmicutes),优势菌群为厚壁菌门(Firmicutes)细菌、拟杆菌门(Bacteroidetes)细菌、未培养瘤胃细菌(uncultured rumen bacterium)、未培养细菌(uncultured bacterium)和韦荣球菌科(Veillonellaceae)细菌,特异性细菌为不动杆菌属(Acinetobacter sp.)细菌和瘤胃球菌属(Ruminococcaceae)细菌。结果提示,绵羊4个胃中均含有种类丰富和数量巨大的细菌,且随着消化道部位由前往后的顺序,菌群的多样性呈现先高后降低再升高的趋势。 In order to compare the bacterial flora diversity of rumen, reticulum, omasum and abomasum from sheep, polymerase chain reactiondenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis ( PCR-DGGE) analysis compounded with cloning and sequencing of bands in DGGE profiles were used, and cluster analysis and principal constituent analysis ( PCA) of bacterial flora were carried out. The results showed as follows: the average number of DGGE bands of contents in rumen, reticulum, omasum and abomasum was 18, 13, 16 and 15, respectively;Shannon diversity index, evenness and richness of bacteria in rumen and omasum were higher, which were 2.83, 0.79 and 17.00, and 2.82, 0.79 and 16.80, respectively, however, those of reticulum and abomasum were lower, which were 2.52, 0.70 and 12.60, and 2.73, 0.76 and 15.40, respectively; clustering analysis results suggested that there were some differences in bacterial flora among the contents in different stomachs, but the similarity coefficients from the same segment of stomach of different animals were all above 0.63;most of the sequenced bands belonged to Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, uncultured rumen bacterium, uncultured bacterium and Veillonellaceae were predominant in stomach, while the special bacteria were Acinetobacter sp. and Ruminococcaceae bacteria. In conclusion, there are rich kinds and large a-mount of bacteria in the four stomachs of sheep. With rearward moving of position of intestinal tract, the diversity increased firstly and then decreased and finally increased.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期298-304,共7页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
基金 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金资助项目(200835-1) 四川省学术带头人培养基金资助
关键词 绵羊 细菌 PCR-DGGE 聚类分析 主成分分析 PCR-DGGE sheep stomach bacteria PCR-DGGE cluster analysis PCA
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1BACKHED F, LEY R E, SONNENBURG J L, et alHost-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine[J],Science, 2005,307 ( 5717 ) : 1915-1920.
  • 2DETHLEFSEN L, MCFALL-NGAI M, RELMAN D A.An ecological and evolutionary perspective on hu- man-microbe mutualism and disease[ J ]. Nature, 2007,449(7164) :811-818.
  • 3刘开朗,王加启,卜登攀.2008-2009年反刍动物营养研究进展 Ⅰ.瘤胃微生物多样性与功能[J].中国畜牧兽医,2010,37(2):5-14. 被引量:28
  • 4PEI C X, LIU Q, DONG C S, et al. Diversity and a- bundance of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences in forestomach of alpacas (Lama pacos ) and sheep ( Ovis aries) [ J ].Anaerobe, 2010,16(4) :426-432.
  • 5FOUTS D E, SZPAKOWSKI S, PURUSHE J, et al.Next generation sequencing to define prokaryotic and fungal diversity in the bovine rumen [ J ]. PLoS One, 2012,7 ( 11 ) : e48289.
  • 6LIN B,LU Y,SALEM A Z M,et al.Effects of essen- tial oil combinations on sheep ruminal fermentation and digestibility of a diet with fumarate included [ J ]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2013,184 ( 1/ 2/3/4) : 24-32.
  • 7EDWARDS J E,MCEWAN N R,TRAVIS A J,et al. 16S rDNA library-based analysis of ruminal bacterial diversity [ J ]. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2004, 86 (3) :263-281.
  • 8MUYZER G, DE WAAL E C, UIRRERLINDEN A G.Profiling of complex microbial population by dena- turing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymer- ase chain reaction-amplified genes encoding for 16S rRNA [ J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1993,59(3) : 695-700.
  • 9LI M, GONG J H, COTR1LL M, et al. Evaluation of QIAamp: DNA Stool Mini Kit for ecological studies of gut microbiota [ J ]. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2003,54 ( 1 ) : 13-20.
  • 10WALTER J, HERTEL C, TANNOCK G W, et al. De- tection of Lactobacillus , Pediococcus , Leuconostoc and Weissella species in human feces by using group-spe- cific PCR primers and denaturing gradient gel electro- phoresis [ J ]. Applied and Environmental Microbiolo- gy,2001,67(6) :2578-2585.

二级参考文献78

  • 1范志勇,沈静玲,王康宁,周定刚.猪胃肠道微生态平衡的调控技术研究进展[J].饲料工业,2005,26(6):38-43. 被引量:11
  • 2苏勇,朱伟云.仔猪哺乳期和断奶后胃中细菌和乳酸杆菌菌群的变化[J].肠外与肠内营养,2006,13(1):1-4. 被引量:23
  • 3李玉娥.动物肠道微生态环境的研究[J].畜牧兽医科技信息,2006,22(5):6-8. 被引量:5
  • 4Dubos R, Schaedler R W, Costello R, et al. Indigenous, normal a nd autochthonous flora of the gastrointestinal tract[J]. J Exp Med, 1965, 122: 67-75.
  • 5Savage D C. Microbial ecology of the gastrointestinal tract[J]. Annu Rev Microbiol, 1977, 31: 107-133.
  • 6Pluske J R, Le Dividich J, Verstegen M W A. Weaning the pig: Concepts and consequences [M]. Netherlands:Wagenningen Academic Publishers, 2003.
  • 7Mathew A G, Robbins C M. Influence of galactosy lactose on energy and protein digestibility, enteric microflora, and performance of weanling pigs [J]. J Anita Sci, 1997, 75 (4): 1009-1016,.
  • 8Conway P L. The Proceedings of the VI International Symposiu for Digestion and Physiology of pigs[M]. Chengdu: Sichuan Science and Technology Press, 1997.
  • 9Fuller R. Probiotics in man and animals[J]. J Appl Bacteriol, 1989, 66: 365-378.
  • 10Lee A. Gemmell E. Changes in the mouse intesinal microflora during weaning:role of volatile fatty acids [J]. Infect Inmmun, 1972, 5:1-7.

共引文献102

同被引文献66

引证文献8

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部