期刊文献+

胃癌患者5-氟尿嘧啶用药安全性Meta分析 被引量:4

Meta Analysis on the Safety of Using 5-FU in Patients with Gastric Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价胃癌患者使用5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的安全性,为临床合理用药提供参考。方法检索国内外发表的关于5-FU治疗胃癌随机对照试验的中英文文献,制订文献纳入及排除标准,对纳入文献进行统计和分析。结果共检索文献794篇,最终纳入11篇。纳入研究经统计、分析得出,5-FU与双药联用比较,血小板减少、腹泻发生率显著低于对照组,口腔黏膜炎发生率显著高于对照组;与三药联用比较,白细胞和血小板减少发生率显著低于对照组。漏斗图显示,纳入研究的发表偏倚较小。结论 5-FU作为常用的胃癌化学治疗药物,安全性较好。 Objective To systematically evaluate the safety of using 5-FU in the patients with gastric carcinoma to provide reference for rational clinical drug use. Methods The Chinese and English literatures of the randomized controlled trial(RCT)on 5-FU in the treat- ment of gastric carcinoma were retrieved. The inclusion and the exclusion standards were formulated. The included RCT were performed the statistical analysis. Results Totally 794 articles were retrieved and 11 articles were finally included. The statistical analysis found that comparing 5-FU with the 2-drug combination, the occurrence rate of thrombocytopenia and diarrhea were lower than that in the control group; the occurrence rate of oral mucositis was significantly higher than that in the control group. Compared with the 3-drug combination, the occurrence rate of leueopenia and thrombocytopenia was significantly lower than that in the control group. The funnel plot showed that the publication bias of the included RCT was small. Conclusion 5-FU as a commonly used chemotherapeutic drug of gastric carcinoma has better safety.
出处 《中国药业》 CAS 2015年第2期27-32,共6页 China Pharmaceuticals
基金 国家社科基金资助项目 项目编号:13BGL132
关键词 META分析 胃癌 5-氟尿嘧啶 药品安全性 随机对照试验 Meta analysis gastric carcinoma 5-FU drug safety RCT
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1李征,杨克虎,米登海,田金徽,刘晓光.进展期胃癌术后腹腔热灌注化疗有效性和安全性的系统评价[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(12):1402-1408. 被引量:33
  • 2Kelsen D, Atiq OT, Sahz L,et al. FAMTX venus etoposide doxontbicin and cisp|atin: a randomized trial in gastric cancert[J].J Clin Oncol, 1992,10 (2):541 -48.
  • 3王平,陈永法.多西他赛联合顺铂、5-氟尿嘧啶治疗晚期胃癌的Meta分析[J].中国药物经济学,2013,8(1):9-14. 被引量:7
  • 4Patrick J, llarry D, Chlcbowski RT, et al. 5 -fluorouracil vs. epirubicin vs. 5 -fluorouracil plus epiruhicin in advanced gastric carcinuma. Invest New Drugs, 1994,12 ( 1 ) : 57 - 63.
  • 5Chang HM, Jung KH, Kim TY, el al. A phase III randomized trial of 5 - fluorouracil,doxorubicin,and mitomycin C versus 5 - fluorouracil and mitomycin C versus 5 - fluorouracil alone in curatively reseeted gastric caneer[J]. Annals ofOncology,2002,13(11) : 1 779 - 1 785.
  • 6Bouche O, Shou MY, Burtin P, et al. Adiuvant chemotherapy with 5 -fluorouracil and cisplatin compared with surgery alone for gastric cancer: 7 - year results of the FFCI) randomized phase III trial (8801) [J]. Annals of Oncology ,2005,16(9) : 1 488 - 1 497.
  • 7Stephen A, Charles G, ltarry S, et al. Controlled evaluation of three drug combination regimens versus fluorouracil alone for the therapy of advanced gastric cancer, north central cancer treatment group[J] . J Clin Oncol, 1994,12(2) :412 - 416.
  • 8Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H, el al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotccan plus cisplatin versus S- 1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a ran- domised phase 3 study [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2009,10 (9) : 1 063 - 1 069.
  • 9Coombes RC, Chilvers CED, Amadori D, et al. Randomised trial of epiru- bicin versus fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer. An international col- laborative cancer group(ICCG) study[J]. Ann Oncol, 1994,5(1 ) :33 - 36.
  • 10Kuniaki S, Narikazu B, Yasuhide Y, et al. Randomized phase III study of 5 -fluorouracil continuous infusion vs. sequential methotrexate and 5 - nuorouraeil therapy in far advanced gastric cancer with peritoneal metas- tasis (JCOG0106) [J]. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2013,43 (10):972 -980.

二级参考文献54

共引文献48

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部