期刊文献+

Numeral Classifiers and the White Horse Paradox

Numeral Classifiers and the White Horse Paradox
原文传递
导出
摘要 This paper presents an interpretation of Gongsun Long's white horse paradox. The Chinese sentence he uses to state his main thesis (Bai ma fei ma) has two potential readings: (a) The white horses are not horses. (b) The white horses are not the horses Although (a) gives the usual and correct reading of the sentence, according to the interpretation, Gongsun Long takes it to state (b). He gives good arguments for (b) while taking them to establish (a) as well, for he fails to distinguish between the two different theses. In presenting this interpretation, the paper gives an account of the function of numeral classifiers and discusses the semantics of count nouns in languages with no grammatical number system, including classical Chinese and classifier languages (e.g., contemporary Chinese). This paper presents an interpretation of Gongsun Long's white horse paradox. The Chinese sentence he uses to state his main thesis (Bai ma fei ma) has two potential readings: (a) The white horses are not horses. (b) The white horses are not the horses Although (a) gives the usual and correct reading of the sentence, according to the interpretation, Gongsun Long takes it to state (b). He gives good arguments for (b) while taking them to establish (a) as well, for he fails to distinguish between the two different theses. In presenting this interpretation, the paper gives an account of the function of numeral classifiers and discusses the semantics of count nouns in languages with no grammatical number system, including classical Chinese and classifier languages (e.g., contemporary Chinese).
作者 Byeong-uk Yi
出处 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》 2014年第4期498-522,共25页 中国哲学前沿(英文版)
关键词 Gongsun Long White Horse Dialogue white horse paradox numeral classifier classifier language mass noun thesis bare noun Gongsun Long, White Horse Dialogue, white horse paradox, numeral classifier, classifier language, mass noun thesis, bare noun
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2000. Classifiers: A Typology of Noun Categorization Devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 2Allan, K. 1977. “Classifiers.” Zawgwdge 53: 285-311.
  • 3Bamer,D. & Snedeker, J. 2005. “Quantity Judgments and Individuation.” Cognition 97: 41-66.
  • 4Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • 5Borer, H. 2005. In Name Only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 6Chan, W.-T. 1963. A Sourcebook in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 7Chao, Y. R. 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
  • 8Cheng, L. L.-S. & Sybesma, R. 1998. “Yi-Wan Tang, Yi-Ge Tang: Classifiers and Massiflers.” The Tsinghua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 28: 385-412.
  • 9Cheng, L. L.-S. and Sybesma, R. 1999. “Bare and Not-so-bare Nouns and the Structure of NP?” Linguistic Inquiry 30: 509-42.
  • 10Cheng, L. L.-S. and Sybesma, R. 2005. “Classifiers in Four Varieties of Chinese,” in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, edited by G. Cinque and R. Kayne, 259-92. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部