期刊文献+

肾移植与肝移植术后抗HLA抗体产生的比较研究 被引量:1

The comparative study of PRA following kidney and liver transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究肾移植和肝移植术后患者抗HLA抗体产生几率。方法研究对象为首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院2007年10月至2009年12月的肾移植患者371例和2012年1月至2014年3月肝移植术后患者82例。采用美国莱姆德公司和GTI公司提供的酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)法检测肾移植患者群体反应性抗体。结果 371例肾移植患者中,29例患者PRA阳性,占7.82%,342例患者PRA阴性,占92.18%。29例PRA阳性患者中7例抗HLA-I例抗体阳性患者,5例抗HLA-II例抗体阳性患者,17例抗HLA-I+II例抗体阳性患者。82例肝移植患者中,7例患者PRA阳性,占8.54%;75例患者PRA阴性,占91.46%。7例PRA阳性患者中1例抗HLA-I例抗体阳性患者,4例抗HLA-II例抗体阳性患者,2例例抗HLA-I+II例抗体阳性患者。肾移植术后与肝移植术后抗体产生率无统计学意义(χ2=0.576,P>0.05)。结论肾移植与肝移植术后抗HLA抗体产生几率无显著差异。 Objective To investigate the generation probability of panel reaction antibody(PRA)following kidney and liver transplanta-tion. Methods 371 kidney transplantation and 82 liver transplantation patients were available for PRA detection with ELISA kit.(GTI,USA). The kidney and liver transplantations were performed during Oct 2007 to Dec 2009 and Jan 2012 to Mar 2014 respectively. Results In the 371 kidney transplantation patients,29 showed PRA positive(7. 82% ,29 / 371),including 7 anti - HLA class I antibody,5 anti - HLA class II anti-body and 17 anti - HLA class I + II antibodies. In the 82 liver transplantation patients,7 showed PRA positive,(8. 54% ,7 / 82),including 1 an-ti - HLA class I antibody,4 anti - HLA class II antibody,and 2 anti - HLA class I + II antibodies. The incidence of PRA production between kid-ney and liver transplantation patients had no statistically significant difference(χ2 = 0. 576,P ﹥ 0. 05). Conclusion No statistically significant difference of PRA following kidney and liver transplantation.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2015年第1期4-6,共3页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(项目编号:81273271)
关键词 肝移植 肾移植 PRA Liver transplantation Kidney transplantation Panel reactive antibody
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Singh N, Diamali A, Lorentzen D, et al. Pretransplant donor - specific antibodies detected by single - antigen bead flow eytometry are associat- ed with inferior kidney transplant outcomes[ J]. Transplantation, 2010, 90(10) :1079 - 1084.
  • 2Ishida H, Hiral T, Kohei N, et al. Significance of qualitative and quan- titative evaluations of anti - HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation [J]. Transpl Int, 2011,24(2)150-157.
  • 3贾保祥,马威然,田野.HLA配型和DSA对移植肾功能的影响研究[J].中华微生物学和免疫学杂志,2012,32(4):315-317. 被引量:8
  • 4贾保祥,林俊,田野.肾移植术后长期存活患者群体反应性抗体的研究[J].临床和实验医学杂志,2013,12(8):582-583. 被引量:7
  • 5Del Bello A, Congy- J olivet N, Muscari F, et al. Prevalence, inci- dence and risk factors for donor - specific anti - HLA antibodies in ma- intenance liver transplant patients[J]. Am J Transplant, 2014,14 ( 4 ) : 867 - 875.
  • 6Taner T, Gandhi MJ, Sanderson SO, et al. Prevalence, course and im- pact of HLA donor - specific antibodies in liver transplantation in the first year[J]. Am J Transplant, 2012,12(6) :1504 -1510.
  • 7Musat AI, Pigott CM, Ellis TM, et al. Pretransplant donor - specific anti - HLA antibodies as predictors of early allograft rejection in ABO - compatible liver transplantation [ J ]. Liver Transpl, 2013,19 ( 10 ) : 1132 -1141.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Paramesh AS, Zhang R, Baber J, et al. The effect of HLA mis- match on highly sensitized renal allograft recipients. Clin Trans- plant, 2010, 24(6) : E247- E252.
  • 2Meier-Kriesche HU, Scornik JC, Susskind B, et al. A lifetime versus a graft life approach redefines the importance of HLA matc- hing in kidney transplant patients. Transplantation, 2009, 88(1) : 23-29.
  • 3Banasik M, Boratyf~ska M, Nowakowska B, et al. Variability in donor-specific alloantibody production after transplantation. Trans- plant Proc, 2007, 39(9) : 2715-2717.
  • 4Lefaucheur C, Loupy A, Hill GS, et al. Preexisting donor-specific HLA antibodies predict outcome in kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2010, 21 (8) : 1398-1406.
  • 5Everly MJ. Using HLA antibody detection, monitoring, and treatment to improve long - term allograft survival [ J ]. Clin Transpl, 2010 : 317 - 322.
  • 6Ntokou IS, Iniotaki AG, Kontou EN, et al. Long - term follow up for anti - HLA donor specific antibodies postrenal transplantation : high im- munogenicity of HLA class II gTaft molecules[ J]. Transpl Int ,2011,24 ( 11 ) :1084 - 1093.
  • 7Terasaki PI, Ozawa M, Castro R. Four - year follow - up of a prospec- tive trial of HLAand MICA antibodies on kidney graft survival[ J]. Am J Transplant,2007,7 ( 2 ) :408 - 415.
  • 8Hyun J, Park KD, Yoo Y, et al. Effects of different sensitization events on HLA aUoimmunization in solid organ transplantation patients [ J ]. Transplant Proc,2012,44 ( 1 ) :222 - 225.
  • 9贾保祥,孙立宁,武俊杰,田野.女性尿毒症患者输血、妊娠和再次移植与群体反应性抗体(PRA)的关系[J].现代检验医学杂志,2009,24(6):134-136. 被引量:2
  • 10薛武军,侯军,田普训,何晓丽,郭奇,丁小明,潘晓鸣,燕航,冯新顺,项和立,李生斌.HLA配型对肾移植长期效果的影响(2508例次总结)[J].中华器官移植杂志,2010,31(11):654-656. 被引量:11

共引文献13

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部