期刊文献+

肾小管功能在亚临床糖尿病肾病诊断价值中的初步探讨 被引量:12

Diagnostic value of renal tubular function in subclinical diabetic nephropathy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察2型糖尿病患者的肾小管功能,分析肾小管损伤标记物与亚临床糖尿病肾病(DN)的关系.方法 298例2型糖尿病患者根据24h尿微量白蛋白(UMA)和估算的肾小球滤过率(GFR)分为对照组(NC组,正常白蛋白尿及正常滤过率,n=100)、亚临床DN组(SDN组,正常白蛋白尿高滤过率,n =87)和早期DN组(EDN组,微量白蛋白尿,n=111).应用免疫透射比浊法检测24 h UMA、尿视黄醇结合蛋白(RBP)、尿β2-微球蛋白(β2-MG),生化法测定尿N-乙酰-D-氨基葡萄糖苷酶(NAG)、β-半乳糖苷酶(GAL),分析各组肾小管损伤标记物及其与亚临床DN的关系.结果 与NC组相比,SDN组NAG较高(χ2=9.032,P<O.01),而与EDN组差异无统计学意义;EDN组RBP水平明显高于NC组及SDN组(χ2=56.341,31.955,P均<0.01);NC组、SDN组、EDN组GAL、β2-MG水平呈升高趋势,但差异无统计学意义.与NC组相比,SDN组及EDN组近端肾小管功能异常率较高(分别为59%,82%,78.2%,χ2=42.658,P<0.01).SDN组肾小管损伤标记物中一项或两项异常者的比例高于NC组及EDN组.肾小管损伤标记物中两项异常者有发生亚临床DN的风险[优势比(OR)=2.9,P=0.005],但经校正年龄、性别、糖尿病病程、总甘油三酯、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白-胆固醇、糖化血红蛋白、体重指数后,差异无统计学意义(OR=1.7,P>0.05).结论 肾小管损伤可能对早期肾功能减退的判断较肾小球损伤更重要,尿白蛋白正常但GFR升高的亚临床DN患者肾小管损伤标记物的水平升高及种类增多. Objective To investigate the renal tubular function in type 2 diabetic patients,and analyze the relationship between tubular injury markers and subclinical diabetic nephropathy (DN).Methods Two hundred and ninty-eight patients with type 2 diabetes were divided into three groups based on their 24-hour urinary microalbumin (UMA) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR):normal control group (NC group,with normal albuminuria and eGFR,n =100),subclinical diabetic nephropathy group (SDN group,with normoalbuminuria and glomerular hyperfiltration,n =87) and early diabetic nephropathy group (EDN group,with microalbuminuria,n =111).Immunoturbidimetric method was used to detect the level of 24-hour UMA,retinol binding protein (RBP) and β2-microglobubin(β2-MG) in urine.Biochemical method was used to measure N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and galactosidase (GAL) in urine.The tubular injury markers and the relationship between renal tubular function and subclinical DN were analyzed.Results NAG in SDN group was higher than that in NC group (χ2 =9.032,P 〈 0.01),but no difference was found between SDN and EDN group.Urinary RBP in EDN group was greater than those in other two groups (χ2 =56.341,31.955,all P 〈0.01).Although there was an increasing trend,the levels of β2-MG and GAL in NC,SDN and EDN group had no statistical difference.Compared with NC group,the percentages of patients with proximal tubular dysfunction were higher,in SDN and EDN group (59%,78.2%,82% respectively,χ2 =42.658,P 〈 0.01).The percentage of patients with one or two tubular injury markers in SDN group was greater than those in other two groups.Patients with two tubular injury markers were more likely to suffer from subclinical DN [odd ratio (OR) =2.9,P =0.005],but after adjusting for age,sex,diabetic duration,total triglyceride,total cholesterol,high density lipoprotein-cholesterol,glycosylated hemoglobin and body mass index,the predictive value disappeared (OR =1.7,P 〉 0.05).Conclusion Compared with glomerular injury,tubular injury may be more important for judging the early impairment in renal function.Subclinical DN patients with normoalbuminuria and hyperfiltration have higher level of tubular injury markers.
出处 《国际内分泌代谢杂志》 2015年第1期22-26,共5页 International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81173428,81373864,81200612) 天津市自然科学基金资助项目(10JCYBJC13200)
关键词 亚临床糖尿病肾病 肾小管损伤标记物 肾小球滤过率 微量白蛋白尿 Subclinical diabetic nephropathy Renal tubular injury markers Glomerular filtration rate Microalbuminuria
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Menon R, Mohd Noor FS, Draman CR, et al. A retrospective re- view of diabetic nephropathy patients during refen'al to the sub- urban nephrology clinic[J], Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl, 2012, 23(5): 1109-1114.
  • 2Fioretto P, Caramori ML, Mauer M. The kidney in diabetes: dy- namic pathways of injury and repair. The Camillo Golgi Lecture 2007[J]. Diabetologia, 2008, 51 (8): 1347-1355.
  • 3Liu C, Chen H, Liu C, et al. Combined application of eGFR and albuminuria for the precise diagnosis of stage 2 and 3a CKD in the elderly [ J ]. J Nephrol, 2014, 27 (3) : 289-297.
  • 4National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines tor chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and strati- fication [ J ]. Am J Kidney Dis,2002,39 (2 Suppl I ) : S1 -S266.
  • 5Remuzzi G, Bertani T. Pathophysiology of progressive nephropa- thies[J]. NEnglJ Med, 1998, 339(20): 1448-1456.
  • 6Nosadini R, Velussi M, Brocco E, et al. Course of Inal func- tion in type 2 diabetic patients with abnormalities of albumin ex- cretion rate [ J]. Diabetes, 2000, 49 (3) : 476-484.
  • 7Fu WJ, Xiong SL, Fang.YG, et al. Urinary tubular biomarkers in short-term type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a eross-seetional study[J]. Endocrine, 2012,41(1): 82-88.
  • 8Fu WJ, Li BL, Wang SB, et al. Changes of the tubular markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus with glomerular hyperfiltration [ J ]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2012, 95( 1 ) : 105-109.
  • 9Bonventre JV. Can we target tubular damage to prevent nal function decline in diabetes? [ J]. Semin Nephro1,2012,32 (5) : 452-462.

同被引文献91

  • 1周珊,陈金玉,吕达嵘,王苏建.血清胱抑素C、尿微量白蛋白、尿NAG联合检测在高血压早期肾病中的临床意义[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(26):84-84. 被引量:1
  • 2丁小强,王一梅.老年人肾脏生理学特点与肾功能衰竭[J].老年医学与保健,2006,12(2):67-69. 被引量:13
  • 3李旭升,傅晓骏,郎旭军,叶赏和,黄斌伦.银杏叶提取物对早期糖尿病肾病患者细胞间黏附分子-1和血管细胞黏附分子-1水平的影响[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2007,27(5):412-414. 被引量:21
  • 4中华医学会糖尿病学分会.中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2010年版)[J].中华糖尿病杂志,2010,2增刊2:1-56.
  • 5Pofi R, Di MF, Gigante A, et al. Diabetic nephropathy: focuson current and future therapeutic strategies[J]. Curr DrugMetab, 2016,17(5):497-502.
  • 6Guariguata L, Whiting DR, Hambleton I,et al. Globalestimates of diabetes prevalence for 2013 and projections for2035[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract,2014,103(2):137-149. DOI:10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.002.
  • 7Conserva F, Gesualdo L, Papale M. A systems biologyoverview on human diabetic nephropathy: from geneticsusceptibility to post-transcriptional and post-translationalmodifications[J]. J Diabetes Res, 2016,2016:7934504. DOI:10.1155/2016/7934504.
  • 8Fioretto P, Caramori ML, Mauer M. The kidney in diabetes:dynamic pathways of injury and repair. The Camillo GolgiLecture 2007[J]. Diabetologia, 2008,51 (8): 1347-1355. DOI:10.1007/s00125-008-1051-7.
  • 9Vallon V. The proximal tubule in the pathophysiology of thediabetic kidney[J]. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol,2011,300(5):R1009-1022. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00809.2010.
  • 10Hansen TW, Thijs L, Li Y, et al. Prognostic value ofreading-to-reading blood pressure variability over 24 hours in8938 subjects from 11 populations[J]. Hypertension, 2010,55(4):1(M9-1057. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.140798.

引证文献12

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部