摘要
临床医学文献中的"模糊"信息不同于制假却严重影响了文献的质量。本文从临床医学文献入手,发现存在"模糊"信息如下:1组间资料分布、讨论比较过程中的可比性问题;2随访过程中的随访时间、随访率问题;3检验结果与图形选取上不够具体和准确。就如何杜绝"模糊"提出信息应注意的地方如下:1组间资料分布是否存在偏倚,是否满足相同标准;2要重视随访过程中实际样本为提升文献质量,本文数量;3应交代具体P值,并依据横坐标变量性质来选择不同的图形。
Clinical medical literature in "vague"phenomenon is different from counterfeits. but it seriously offects the quality of clinical medical literature. I study with a clinical oncology literature and discovered"vague"phenomenon,they are the comparability problem of grouped data distribution,comparing of discuss; the problem of follow- up time and follow- up rate; Test results and graphics were selected on the lack of specific and accurate. In order to enhance the quality of clinical medical literature,this paper giues specific recommendations and methods,they are: grouped data distribution whether there is bias,whether to meet the same standards; To pay attention to the actual number of samples during follow- up; To explain the specific value of P,and based on the abscissa variable properties to choose a different graphics. I hope to cause widespread concern and play a catalyst role.
出处
《医学与社会》
2015年第1期48-50,共3页
Medicine and Society
关键词
临床医学文献
文献质量
“模糊”信息
Clinical Medicine Literature
Literature Quality
"Vague"Information