关于官钧创烧年代的探讨

Discussion on the Fired Years of Jun Porcelain for the Palace

钧瓷有民钧和官钧之分,民钧创烧于北宋早期,在北宋末年,质量上乘窑变奇特向宫廷供奉的花器称为官钧。由于同时代文献记载的缺失,官钧的始烧年代始终成为争议的焦点。从文献资料、钧瓷的审美特征、考古发掘资料等方面研究,官钧金代说、元代说、明代说都回避了民窑的"器皿类钧瓷",只对所谓"官钧"的陈设类器皿质疑猜测,以偏盖全,忽视了民钧和官钧的关系问题,相对而言,北宋说仍然比较有说服力。

Jun Porcelain has Min Jun and Guan Jun. Min Jun started to be fired in the early Northern Song Dynasty. Guan Jun, dedicated to the palace in the Northern Song Dynasty, referred to flower wares of high quality and with exotic kiln flower. Due to the lack of contemporary documents, Guan Jun initiation age always becomes the focus of dispute. From the literature, Jun aesthetic characteristics, archaeological data and so on, all the representative statements about Jun porcelain in three dynasties of Jin, Yuan and Ming took one side. They only questioned and speculated about the Guan Jun＇ s utensils for furnishing, but avoided the vessels for Min Jun. By doing this, they ignored the relationship between Guan Jun and Min Jun, therefore it is untenable. And the argument in the Northern Song Dynasty is still more persuasive.