期刊文献+

乳房整形者生活质量测定量表隆乳术模块中文版的应用评价 被引量:9

Quality of life questionnaire for women with breast surgery: evaluation of the Chinese version ofBREAST-Q augmentation module
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的测定评价美国纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Cen—ter.MSKCC)和加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学(Universityof British Columbia,UBC)共同开发的乳房整形者生活质量测定量表(BREAST—Questionnaire,BREAST—Q)隆乳术模块中文版的应用效果。方法通过测定10例隆乳者术前2周、术前ld、术后14周、术后16周的生活质量对BREAST—Q量表(隆乳术前、术后)进行评价。结果术前2周隆乳者对乳房的满意度、社会心理状况与性生活状况3个领域的得分分别为(29.9±5.8)、(16.5±10.2)、(28.2±9.3)分。术后16周隆乳者对乳房的满意度、社会心理状况与性生活状况3个领域的得分分别为(65.3±10.0)、(67.5±17.8)、(56.5±22.2)分,与术前相比较,平均得分均相差20分以上,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但是身体状况的得分在术前2周为(64.9±11.9)分,术后16周为(56.0±14.5)分,差异无统计学意义(P〉O.05)。各领域的重测信度均在0.8以上,并且大部分在0.9以上;所有领域的Cronbach系数a均在0.6以上。结论BREAST—Q量表隆乳术模块中文版具有较好的信度和反应度,可用于中国隆乳者的生活质量测定,值得进一步扩大样本量进行研究。 Objective BREAST-Questionnaire (BREAST-Q) was a patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument designed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and University of British Columbia (UBC). Our study aimed to evaluate the Chinese version of BREAST-Q augmen- tation module in China. Methods BREAST-Q augmentation module consisted of two parts: pre-oper- ative and post-operative. Pre-operative had 25 items. Post-operative had 88 items. BREAST-Q ques- tionnaires were given to ten breast augmentation patients. All patients completed BREAST-Q ques- tionnaires at two weeks pre augmentation, one day pre augmentation, fourteen weeks post augmenta- tion, and sixteen weeks post augmentation. Results At two weeks pre augmentation, scores for sat- isfaction with breasts, psychosocial well-being, and sexual well-being were 29.9±5.8, 16.5±10.2, and 28.2±9. 3, respectively. At sixteen weeks post augmentation, scores for these three domains were statistically increased to be 65. 3±10.0, 67.5±17.8, and 56.54±22.2, respectively. These differences were all above 20. However, there was no significant difference between pre augmentaion score and post augmentation score for physical well-being. Pre augmentation score was 64.9 ±11.9, and post augmentation score was 56.0± 14.5. Test retest reliabilities in different domains were all a- bove 0.8 and most were above 0.9. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients were higher than 0.6. Conclu- sions Chinese version of BREAST-Q augmentation module is reliable and responsive in assessing the quality of life in Chinese women with breast surgery. However, larger sample is needed for future study.
出处 《中华医学美学美容杂志》 2014年第6期413-415,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Aesthetics and Cosmetology
关键词 隆乳术 生活质量 乳房整形者生活质量测定量表 Breast augmentation Quality of life BREAST-Questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1穆大力.提高自体脂肪移植隆乳效果及减少并发症的策略[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2013,19(5):321-322. 被引量:21
  • 2许柯,刘飞,郭正东,林海波,杨卫国,洪浩,梁智.先天乳腺不发育伴轻度鸡胸行隆乳术治疗的临床效果评价[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2010,16(3):152-154. 被引量:2
  • 3陈育哲,薛红宇,李东.隆乳术后效果评价的改进及胸肌后与乳腺后假体置人隆乳术者的满意度调查[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2009,15(6):375-377. 被引量:8
  • 4Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2009,124(2) :345-353.
  • 5Coriddi M, Angelos T, Nadeau 1VI, et al. Analysis of satisfac- tion and well-being in the short follow-up from breast augmen- tation using the BREAST-Q, a validated survey instrument [J]. Aesthet Surg J, 2013,33(2) :245-251.
  • 6Coriddi M, Nadeau M, Taghizadeh M, etal. Analysis of sat- isfaction and well-being following breast reduction using a vali- dated survey instrument: the BREAST-Q [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013,132(2) :285-290.
  • 7Koslow S, Pharmer LA, Scott AM, etal. Long-term patient- reported satisfaction after contralateral prophylactic mastecto- my and implant reconstruction [J].Ann Surg Oncol, 2013,20 (11) :3422-3429.
  • 8Gonzalez MA, Glickman LT, Aladegbami B, et al. Quality of life after breast reduction surgery: a 10-year retrospective a- nalysis using the Breast Q questionnaire: does breast size mat- ter [J]? Ann Plast Surg, 2012,69(4):361-363.
  • 9Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Pusic AL. From BREAST-Q@)to Q- Score: Using raseh measurement to better capture breast surgery outcomes [C]. Proceedings from the Joint Internation- al IMEDO TC1 nu TC7 q- TC13 Symposium. Germany, 2011 : 90-102.
  • 10陈晓芳,胡守舵,姬东硕,黎静.假体隆乳术中3种置入层次效果及安全性的系统评价[J].中国美容整形外科杂志,2014,25(2):76-79. 被引量:1

二级参考文献48

  • 1孔平,陶伟萍.隆乳女性的受术动机及其心理状态调查分析[J].中国美容医学,2004,13(4):472-473. 被引量:5
  • 2于涛,兰云.隆乳术硅胶囊假体放置层次的临床探讨[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2005,11(1):52-52. 被引量:2
  • 3徐志诚,胡廷泽,刘文英,蒋小平,张利兵,罗启成,唐耘熳.改良手术方法重建鸡胸胸壁的疗效观察[J].中国修复重建外科杂志,2005,19(4):304-305. 被引量:4
  • 4穆大力,栾杰.影响移植自体脂肪颗粒存活率因素的研究进展[J].中华医学美学美容杂志,2006,12(4):249-250. 被引量:29
  • 5袁荣 王炜.乳房整形与美容[A].见:王炜主编.整形外科学[C].杭州:浙江科学技术出版社,1999.1133-1155.
  • 6方彰林,宋儒耀,张云龙.乳房的美学//宋儒耀,方彰林.美容整形外科学.第3版.北京:北京出版社,2000:971.
  • 7闫迎军.乳房的美学//乔群,孙家明.乳房整形美容外科学,郑州:郑州大学出版,2004:17-23.
  • 8Gylbert L, Asplund O, Jurell G, et al. Results of subglandular breast augmentation using a new classification method: 18-year follow up. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1989, 23 (2): 133-136.
  • 9Collis N, Oleman D, Ooit T, et al. Ten year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2000,106(4): 786-791.
  • 10Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2006,118(5) :1224-1236.

共引文献33

同被引文献72

  • 1Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing im- plant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2001,107(5):1255-1272.
  • 2Baxter RA. Update on the split-muscle technique for breast augmentation: prevention and correction of animation distor- tion and double-bubble deformity[J]. Aesthet Plast Surg, 2011,35(3):426-429. DOI:10.1007/s00266-010-9599-2.
  • 3Momeni A, Padron NT, Fohn M, et al. Safety, complica- tions, and satisfaction of patients undergoing submuscular breast augmentation via the inframammary and endoscopic transaxillary approach[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg,2005,29(6):558-564.
  • 4Luan J, Mu D,Mu L. Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts[J]. Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2009, 62(11):1459-1463. DOI:10.1016/j. bjps.2008.05.044.
  • 5Lee SH, Yoon WJ. Axillary endoscopic subglandular tunne- ling approach for types 2 and 3 dual-plane breast augmentati- on[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2014,38(3):521-527. DOI :10.1007/s00266-0l4-0306-6.
  • 6Lang SR,Figueras PLL,Alves VA,et al. Transaxillary mus- cle-splitting breast augmentation: experience with 160 cas- es[J]. Aesthetic Plast Surg, 2012,36(2):343-348. DOI :10.1007/s00266-011-9830-9.
  • 7Cheng MH, Huang JJ. Augmentation mammaplasty in Asian women[J]. Semin Plast Surg, 2009 , 23(1):48-54. DOI:10.1055/s-0028-1111101.
  • 8Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast aug mentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process[J]. Pla.st Reconstr Surg, 2006, 118(7 Suppl):35s-45s.
  • 9Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in hrcast aiig mentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2005, 116(7):2005-2016.
  • 10Spear SL, Carter ME,Oanz JC. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to " dual plane " posiuoning : tech nique and outcomes[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2003, 112(2):456-466.

引证文献9

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部