期刊文献+

磁共振灌注定量参数对鼻咽癌病理分化程度的鉴别价值 被引量:1

Value of MRI perfusion quantitative parameters in differentiating undifferentiated and differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨磁共振灌注成像(PWI)定量参数对不同分化程度鼻咽癌(NPC)的鉴别价值。材料与方法 :对94例非角化性NPC(分化型23例、未分化型71例)行PWI。比较两组在PWI定量参数(Ktrans、Kep和Ve)上的差别。结果:未分化型NPC的Ktrans、Kep和Ve值分别为(0.378±0.161)min-1、(1.514±0.488)min-1和0.272±0.123;分化型NPC的Ktrans、Kep和Ve值分别为(0.266±0.059)min-1、(1.204±0.279)min-1和0.232±0.063。Ktrans和Kep值在两组NPC间的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01),Ve值在两组间的差异无统计学意义。基于ROC曲线分析,对于鉴别分化型与未分化型NPC,Ktrans具有较好的敏感性(84.5%),而Kep具有较好的特异性(91.3%)。结论:分化型和未分化型NPC原发灶在PWI定量参数上存在差异,Ktrans和Kep有助于两者的鉴别。 Objective: To explore the potential value of perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging(PWI) parameters in differential diagnosis between undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) and differentiated NPC. Materials and Methods: Ninety-four patients with nonkeratinizing NPC (71 undifferentiated, 23 differentiated) underwent PWI. The difference of PWI quantitative parameters (Ktrans, Kep and Ve) was compared between the undifferentiated NPC and differentiated NPC. Results: The Ktrans, Kep and Ve values of the undifferentiated NPC were (0.378±0.161) min-1, (1.514±0.488) min-1 and 0.272±0.123, respectively. For the differentiated NPC, the Ktrans, Kep and Ve values were (0.266±0.059) min-1, (1.204±0.279) min-1 and 0.232±0.063, respectively. Both Ktrans and Kep values revealed significant difference between the undifferentiated NPC and differentiated NPC. For Ve value, no significant difference was found between the two NPC groups. Based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Ktrans had a sensitivity of 84.5% and Kep had a specificity of 91.3% in differentiating the two NPC groups. Conclusion: There is some difference of PWI quantitative parameters between the differentiated NPC and undifferentiated NPC. Ktrans and Kep are possibly helpful in differential diagnosis between the two NPC groups.
出处 《中国临床医学影像杂志》 CAS 2014年第12期837-839,共3页 Journal of China Clinic Medical Imaging
基金 中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院资助课题(课题编号:A2012-01)
关键词 鼻咽肿瘤 磁共振成像 Nasopharyngeal neoplasms Magnetic resonance imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1朱海滨,刘婧,蔡文超,党祎,杜华瑞,张珏,王霄英.前列腺癌MRI动态增强定量参数Ktrans值与Gleason评分的相关性研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2012,20(7):481-484. 被引量:32
  • 2Zhang N, Zhang L, Qiu B, et al. Correlation of volume transfer coefficient Ktrans with histopathologic grades of gliomas [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 36(2): 355-363.
  • 3Mayr NA, Huang Z, Wang JZ, et al. Characterizing tumor hetero- geneity with functional imaging and quantifying high-risk tumor volume for early prediction of treatment outcome: cervical cancer as a model[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2012, 83(3): 972-979.
  • 4Huang B, Wong CS, Whitcher B, et al. Dynamic contrast-en- hanced magnetic resonance imaging for charaeterising nasopharyn- geal carcinoma: comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters and correlation with tumour stage [J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(6): 1495-1502.
  • 5Zheng D, Chen Y, Chen Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a preliminary study of the correlations between quantitative parameters and clinical stage[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2014, 39(4): 940-948.
  • 6罗容珍,钟碧玲,宗永生,梁小曼,吴秋良,林素暇,何洁华,梁英杰,李智.高发区鼻咽癌病理组织学类型构成的特点[J].中国肿瘤,2001,10(8):473-475. 被引量:21
  • 7田丽,刘立志,范卫君.鼻咽癌MRI动态增强参数与微血管密度和血管内皮生长因子表达的相关性研究[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2009,30(3):336-340. 被引量:14
  • 8Radjenovic A, Dall B J, Ridgway JP, et al. Measurementof phar- macokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [J]. Br J Radiol, 2008, 81(962): 120-128.
  • 9Koo HR, Cho N, Song 1C, et al. Correlation of perfusion parame- ters on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with prognostic factors and subtypes of breast cancers [J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2012, 36(1): 145-151.

二级参考文献37

  • 1李智,林素暇,梁惠珍,梁英杰,何洁华.巨噬细胞移动抑制因子与鼻咽癌微血管生成和淋巴结转移的关系[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2005,26(1):24-28. 被引量:15
  • 2周桥.前列腺癌Gleason分级[J].中华病理学杂志,2005,34(4):240-243. 被引量:44
  • 3宗永生 张汝逢 等.鼻咽恶性肿瘤在高发区(广东省中山县)的发病率及病理组织学特点[J].中华医学杂志,1981,3(1):29-32.
  • 4宗永生 中华人民共和国卫生部医政司.病理组织学诊断.中国常见恶性肿瘤诊治规范第五册——鼻咽癌[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协科医科大学联合出版社,1991.5-13.
  • 5宗永生 姚庆云 等.复发性鼻咽癌的病理形态学观察[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1981,3(1):26-29.
  • 6陈钦材 刘正明.鼻咽癌的病理组织特征[J].中华病理学杂志,1964,:395-399.
  • 7Zhang XM,Yu D,Zhang HL,et al.3D dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI Df rectal carcinoma at 3T:correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor markers of tumor angiogenesis[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2008,27(6):1309-1316.
  • 8Maia AC Jr,Malheiros SM,da Rocha AJ,et al.MR cerebral blood volume maps correlated with vascular endothelial growth factor expression and tumor grade in nonenhancing gliomas[J].AJNR Am J Neuroradiol,2005,26(4):777-783.
  • 9Gossmann A,Helbich TH,Kuriyama N,et al.Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging as,a surrogate marker of tumor response to antiangiogenic therapy in a xenograft model of glioblastoma multiforme[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,15(3):233-240.
  • 10Tuncbilek N,Unlu E,Karakas HM,et al.Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance mammography[J].Breast J,2003,9(5):403-408.

共引文献64

同被引文献23

  • 1顾晋.浅析我国结直肠癌领域存在的问题[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(9):15-18. 被引量:1
  • 2姚云峰.结直肠癌的TNM分期[J].中国继续医学教育,2011,3(9):25-27. 被引量:11
  • 3Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2009, 59(4): 225-249.
  • 4Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, et al. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006[J]. Ann Oncol, 2007, 18(3): 581-592.
  • 5Akasu T, Iinuma G, Takawa M, et al. Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009, 16(10): 2787-2794.
  • 6Oberholzer K, Menig M, Pohlmann A, et al. Rectal cancer: assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2013, 38(1): 119-126.
  • 7Ahn SJ, An CS, Koom WS, et al. Correlations of 3T DCE-MRI quantitative parameters with microvessel density in a human-colorectal-cancer xenograft mouse model[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2011, 12(6): 722-730.
  • 8Jones EF, Sinha SP, Newitt DC, et al. MRI enhancement in stromal tissue surrounding breast tumors: association with recurrence free survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(5): e61969.
  • 9Li X, Arlinghaus LR, Ayers GD, et al. DCE-MRI analysis methods for predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: pilot study findings[J]. Magn Reson Med, 2014, 71(4): 1592-1602.
  • 10Radjenovic A, Dall BJ, Ridgway JP, et al. Measurement of pharmacokinetic parameters in histologically graded invasive breast tumours using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI[J]. Br J Radiol, 2008, 81(962): 120-128.

引证文献1

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部