期刊文献+

不同预后分层的多发性骨髓瘤患者免疫表型特征分析 被引量:11

Immunophenotype Characteristics of Patients with Multiple Myeloma in Different Risk Stratification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究探讨不同预后分层的初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者的免疫表型特点。采用流式细胞仪多参数直接免疫荧光技术,CD45/SSC和CD38/SSC联合设门,对62例初诊的多发性骨髓瘤患者骨髓标本标记CD45、CD38、CD138、CD56、CD19、CD117、CD13、CD20、CD22、CD34、Kappa和Lambda进行检测,并通过ISS分期及细胞遗传学特征进行预后分层,分析和比较不同预后分组患者的免疫表型特点。结果显示:异常浆细胞均表达CD138(100%)及CD38(100%),而CD19+(6.5%),CD45+(22.6%),CD56+(59.6%)及单克隆轻链抗原表达(82%)相对常见,其他CD117+(27.4%),CD13+(17.7%),CD20+(16.1%)存在个体差异;经预后分层后显示,标高、高危组CD56表达率低于低危组(P=0.02),而CD117表达率高于低危组(P=0.011)。结论:多发性骨髓瘤免疫表型具有异质性,在初诊的中、高危患者中CD56表达较低,而CD117表达较高,这可能与不良预后相关。 This study assessed the immunophenotype characteristics of newly diagnosted patients with multiple myeloma( MM) in different risk stratification in order to find the relationship between the immunophenotype and prognosis of MM.The expressions of CD45,CD38,CD138,CD56,CD19,CD117,CD13,CD20,CD22,CD34 KappaLambda in bone marrow samples from 62 newly diagnosed MM patients were detected by using flow cytometric multiparametric direct immunofluorescence technigueCD45 /SSC and CD38 /SSC combination gatingthen the immumophemotypic characteristics of patients in different risk stratification groups were analyzed and compared.The new risk stratification of all patients was carried out according to ISS stages( Interuational Staging System) and cytogenetic characteristics.The results indicated that all the malignant plasma cells commonly expressed CD38(100%)and CD138(100%); CD19^ +( 6.5%),CD45^ +( 22.6%),CD56 ^+( 59.6%)and monoclonal light chain(82%); but the expressions of CD117^ +( 27.4%),CD13 ^+( 17.7%),CD20^ +( 16.1%)were diverse.According to risk stratificationit is found that the standard-risk and high-risk groups had lower expression of CD56( P = 0.022) and higher expression of CD117( P = 0.011),compared with the low-risk group.It is concluded that the immunophenotype of MM is heterogeneitythe lower expression of CD56 and higher expression of CD117 may be associate with poor prognosis.
出处 《中国实验血液学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1624-1627,共4页 Journal of Experimental Hematology
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 免疫分型 预后分层 multiple myeloma(MM) immunophenotype risk stratification
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Chng WJ,Dispenzieri A,Chim CS,et al.IMWG consensus on risk stratification in multiple myeloma.Leukemia,2014,28(2):269-277.
  • 2Kumar S,Rajkumar SV,Kimlinger T,et al.CD45 expression by bone marrow plasma cells in multiple myeloma:clinical and biological correlations.Leukemia,2005,19(8):1466-1470.
  • 3Kawano Y,Fujiwara S,Wada N,et al.Multiple myeloma cells expressing low levels of CD138 have an immature phenotype and reduced sensitivity to lenalidomide.Int J Oncol,2012,41(3):876-84.
  • 4Sahara N,Takeshita A,Shigeno K,et al.Clinicopathological and prognostic characteristics of CD56-negative multiple myeloma.Br J Haematol,2002,117(4):882-885.
  • 5Chang H,Samiee S,Yi QL.Prognostic relevance of CD56 expression in multiple myeloma:a study including 107 cases treated with high-dose melphalan-based chemotherapy and autologous stemcell transplant.Leuk Lymphoma,2006,47(1):43-47.
  • 6林阳,万岁桂,夏长青,孙雪静,贺景娟.CD56-多发性骨髓瘤患者临床特征及预后分析[J].标记免疫分析与临床,2013,20(4):220-225. 被引量:6
  • 7Ocqueteau M(1),Orfao A,García-Sanz R,et al.Expression of the CD117 antigen(c-Kit)on normal and myelomatous plasma cells.Br J Haematol,1996,95(3):489-493.
  • 8李娟,罗绍凯,张国材,洪文德,童秀珍.CD_(117)在多发性骨髓瘤细胞中的表达及其意义[J].癌症,2004,23(8):951-954. 被引量:7
  • 9孙莹,方美云,刘越坚.多发性骨髓瘤免疫表型特征及其意义[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2010,18(2):381-384. 被引量:20
  • 10Mateo G,Montalbán MA,Vidriales MB,et al.Prognostic value of immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma:a study by the PETHEMA/GEM cooperative study groups on patients uniformly treated with high-dose therapy.J Clin Oncol,2008,26(16):2737-2744.

二级参考文献68

  • 1王学文,杨天楹.难治性和复发性骨髓瘤的治疗进展[J].国外医学(输血及血液学分册),1993,16(1):35-37. 被引量:11
  • 2庄俊玲,汪玄,武永吉.CD138/Syndecan-1在多发性骨髓瘤免疫表型中的意义[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2005,13(6):1023-1027. 被引量:10
  • 3Kara IO, Sahin B, Paydas S, et al. Flow cytometric evaluation of bone marrow plasma cells using CD19, CD45, CD56, CD38, and CD138 and correlation with bone marrow infiltration ratio in multiple myeloma patients. Saudi Med J, 2004; 25( 11 ) : 1587 - 1592.
  • 4Braylan RC, Orfao A, Borowitz MJ, et al. Optimal number o4 reagents required to evaluate hematolymphoid neoplasia: results of an international consensus meeting. Cytometry, 2001 ;46 ( 1 ) :23 27.
  • 5Lin P, Owens R, Tricot G, et al. Flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of 306 cases of multiple myeloma. Am J Clin Pathol, 2004, 121 (4): 482-488.
  • 6Sun RX, Lu ZY, Wijdenes J, et al. Large scale and clinical grade purification of syndecan-1 ^+ malignant plasma cells. J lmmunol Methods, 1997 ;205 ( 1 ) :73 - 79.
  • 7Matsui W, Huff CA, Wang QJ, et al. Characterization of clonogenic multiple myeloma cells. Blood, 2004 ; 103 (6) : 2332 - 2336.
  • 8Aref S, Goda T, El-Sherbiny M. Syndecan-I in multiple myeloma: relationship to conventional prognostic factors. Hematology, 2003 ; 8(4) :221 -228.
  • 9Yang Y, Yaccoby S, Liu W. Soluble syndecan-1 promotes growth of myeloma tumors in vivo. Blood, 2002 ;100(2) :610 -617.
  • 10Bashey A, Cantwell MJ, Kipps TJ, et al. Adenovirus transduction to effect CD40 signalling improves the immune stimulatory activity of myeloma cells. Br J Haematol, 2002 ; 118 (2) :506 - 513.

共引文献28

同被引文献55

  • 1江琴,韩佳杞,郑永江.达雷妥尤单抗治疗复发难治多发性骨髓瘤的成本效果分析[J].热带医学杂志,2022,22(1):91-94. 被引量:3
  • 2李娟,罗绍凯,张国材,洪文德,童秀珍.CD_(117)在多发性骨髓瘤细胞中的表达及其意义[J].癌症,2004,23(8):951-954. 被引量:7
  • 3Lee SE, Kim JH, Jeon YW, et al. Impact of extramedullary plasmacytomas on outcomes according to treatment approach in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma [J]. Ann Hematol, 2015, 94 (3): 445-452. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014- 2216-8.
  • 4Lu J, Lu J, Chen W, et al. Clinical features and treatment outcome in newly diagnosed Chinese patients with multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter analysis [J]. Blood Cancer J, 2014, 4: e239. doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.55.
  • 5Vagnoni D, Travaglini F, Pezzoni V, et al. Circulating plasma cells in newly diagnosed symptomatic multiple myeloma as a possible prognostic marker for patients with standard-risk cytogenetics [J]. Br J Haematol, 2015, 170 (4): 523-531. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13484.
  • 6Gonsalves WI, Morice WG, Rajkumar V, et al. Quantification of clonal circulating plasma cells in relapsed multiple myeloma [ J ]. Br J Haematol, 2014, 167(4): 500-505. doi: 10.11 ll/bjh.13067.
  • 7International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classifi- cation of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: a report of the International Myeloma Working Group[J]. Br J Haematol, 2003, 121 (5): 749-757.
  • 8Kumar S, Kimlinger T, Morice W. Immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and related plasma cell disorders [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol, 2010, 23 (3): 433-451. doi: 10.1016/j. beha.2010.09.002.
  • 9Paiva B, Almeida J, Ptrez- Andrts M, et al. Utility of flow cytometry immunophenotyping in multiple myeloma and other clonal plasma cell-related disorders [ J]. Cytometry B Clin Cytom, 2010, 78(4): 239-252. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20512.
  • 10Rawstron AC, Orfao A, Beksac M, et al. Report of the European Myeloma Network on multiparametric flow cytometry in multiple myeloma and related disorders [J]. Haematologica, 2008, 93(3): 431-438. doi: 10.3324/haematol.11080.

引证文献11

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部