期刊文献+

骨髓组织印片在细胞形态学诊断中的实用价值 被引量:2

The diagnostic value of bone marrow tissue imprints in cytomorphology
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 研究骨髓组织印片在细胞形态学诊断中的应用价值.方法 收集2011年1月至2013年12月354份同步进行骨髓涂片、印片和切片检查的临床标本进行对比研究,分析形态学诊断差异性.结果 骨髓组织印片在极度减少、明显减少、正常、轻度增多、明显增多、极度增多组中有核细胞量评估性能优于涂片(P<0.01),而与切片相近(P>0.05).印片有核细胞数量减少者涂片大多减少,而涂片细胞减少者印片大多正常或增加.以骨髓切片有核细胞量变化为标准,有核细胞减少组中涂片与印片符合率均较高(87.5%和96.9%);有核细胞量正常及增多组中印片符合率均高于涂片(87.8%和95.7% vs 68.3%和55.8%),其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01).印片敏感度、特异度及约登指数指标性能评价总体上也优于涂片.浆细胞骨髓瘤(PCM)患者中印片浆细胞总量及幼稚浆细胞量高于涂片(42.73±10.47和13.60±4.83 vs 24.67±11.18和11.07±5.82),其差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 骨髓组织印片兼有涂片和切片的特征,印片在评估有核细胞量及肿瘤细胞浸润度等方面优于涂片,骨髓涂片与印片快速联检可以提高骨髓细胞形态学诊断水平. Objective To investigate the value of bone marrow imprints in the cytomorphology diagnosis.Methods A total of 354 cases of bone marrow smears,imprints,and sections were analyzed from January 2011 to December 2013 to detect morphological diagnosis difference.Results Bone marrow imprints in groups of extremely reduced,significantly reduced,normal,slightly increased,increased significantly,and extreme increase were better than that of smear which nucleated cells quantity assessment(P 〈 0.01).Smears and imprints were similar (P 〉0.05).Imprints nucleated cell number decreased mostly were the same as smear,but smear reduced imprints mostly normal or increased.The bone marrow sections nucleated cells quantity as the standard,smears and imprints had high coincidence rate in the group of nucleated cells reduced (87.5% and 96.9%),and imprints were higher than smear in the group of nucleated cells quantity in normal and increased(87.8% and 95.7% vs 68.3% and 55.8%),and the difference was statistically significant.Imprints were better than smear in specificity,Youden index,and sensitivity.Patients with plasma cell myeloma (PCM) imprint plasma cell volume and immature plasma cells were higher than that of smear (42.73 ± 10.47 and 13.60 ± 4.83 vs 24.67 ± 11.18 and 11.07 ± 5.82) with a statistically significant difference (P 〈 0.05).Conclusions Imprints have characteristics both smear and sections,and imprints are superior to smears in assessment of nucleated cells and tumor cell invasion degree.Smear combined with imprints can improve the diagnosis level of bone marrow cell cytomorphology.
出处 《中国医师杂志》 CAS 2014年第11期1517-1520,共4页 Journal of Chinese Physician
关键词 骨髓检查/方法 活组织检查 细胞诊断学 血液病/诊断 Bone marrow examination/methods Biopsy Cytodiagnosis Hematologic diseases/diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1卢兴国,黄连生,许晓华,杨军军,朱蕾,赵小英,徐根波.骨髓组织印片评估有核细胞量的价值[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2006,35(3):331-335. 被引量:6
  • 2张之南,沈悌主编.血液病诊断和疗效标准[M].3版.北京:北京科学技术出版社.2007:25-29.
  • 3龚旭波,卢兴国,徐根波,吴先国,王琳,张晓红,朱蕾,王炜琴.骨髓印片在骨髓细胞学检验中的应用价值[J].中华医学杂志,2010,90(22):1531-1536. 被引量:9
  • 4Toi PCh, Varghese RG, Rai R. Comparative evaluation of simul- taneous bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy: an insti- tutional experience[ J]. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus, 2010, 26(2) : 41-44.
  • 5Chandra S, Chandra H, Salni S. Bone marrow metastasis by solid tumors-probable hematological indicators and comparison of bone marrow aspirate, touch imprint and trephine biopsy [ J ]. Hematol- ogy, 2010, 15(5): 368-372.
  • 6Gupta R, Setia N, Arora P, et al. Hematological profile in pyrexia of unknown origin : role of bone marrow trephine biopsy vis-a-vis aspiration[J]. Hematology, 2008, 13(5) : 307-312.
  • 7Chandra S, Chandra H. Comparison of bone marrow aspirate cytol- ogy, touch imprint cytology and trephine biopsy for bone marrow e- valuation[ J]. Hematology Reports, 2011,19,3 ( 3 ) : e22.
  • 8Subramanian R, Basu D, Dutta TK. Prognostic significance of bone marrow histology in multiple myeloma [ J ]. Indian J Cancer, 2009.46( 1 ) .. 40-45.
  • 9刘自光,汪江萍,黄茂伦.712例乳腺病变术中快速病理诊断分析[J].中国医师进修杂志,2011,34(17):54-56. 被引量:2
  • 10Frenkel MA, Chigrinova EV, Kupryshina NA, et al. Diagnostic value of study of bone marrow trepanobiopsy imprints in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas [ J ]. Klin Lab Diagn, 2007, 11 (11) :44-47.

二级参考文献28

  • 1Swerdlow SH,Campo E,Harris NL,et al.World Health Organization classification of tumors.Vol 2.Pathology and genetics of tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues.4th ed.Lyon:IARC Press,2008.
  • 2卢兴国.骨髓细胞形态学与病理学.北京:科学出版社,2008.
  • 3Lu XG,Huang LS,Xu XH,et al.Application of bone marrow biopsy imprint in evaluating cellularity.Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban,2006,35:331-335.
  • 4Aboul-Nasr R,Estey EH,Kantarjian HM,et al.Comparison of touch imprints with aspirate smears for evaluating bone marrow specimens.Am J Clin Pathol,1999,111:753-758.
  • 5Kjurkchiev G,Valkov I.Role of touch imprint and core biopsy for detection of tumor metastases in bone marrow.Diagn Cytopathol,1998,18:323-324.
  • 6Sabharwal BD,Malhotra V,Aruna S,et al.Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears,imprints and biopsy sections.J Postgrad Med,1990,36:194-198.
  • 7Pasquale D,Chikkappa G.Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears,biopsy imprints,and biopsy sections.Am J Hematol,1986,22:381-389.
  • 8Dirnhofer S.Modern techniques for the diagnostic evahafion of the trephine bone marrow biopsy:methodological aspects and applications.Prog Histochem Cytochem,2008,42:203-252.
  • 9Kremer M,Quintanilla-Martinez L,N(a)hrig J,et al.1mmunohistochemistry in bone marrow pathology:a useful adjunct for morphologic diagnosis.Virchows Arch,2005,447:920-937.
  • 10Fend F,Tzankov A,Bink K,et al.Modern techniques for the diagnostic evaluation of the trephine bone marrow biopsy:methodological aspects and applications.Prog Histochem Cytochem,2008,42:203-252.

共引文献13

同被引文献12

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部