期刊文献+

2000~2010年中国资源产出率测算 被引量:12

Pilot calculation of resource productivity in Chinafrom 2000 to 2010
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国实际管理需求的基础上,构建了中国经济系统物质流分析(Chinese Economy-wide Material Flow Analysis-CEW-MFA)模型,对传统经济系统物质流分析工具进行了补充和拓展.在该模型的基础上将中国的RP定义为一组4个指标:直接物质投入(DMI)/GDP、本地物质消耗(DMC)/GDP、物质总循环量(CR)/(CR+DMI)与CR/固体废物总产生量(TG).测算了2000~2010年时间段的物质流及RP指标,并对其中的资源经济产出效率进行了国际比较.结果表明,中国现阶段的物质代谢总量高,2010年国家的DMI接近120亿t,DMC超过107亿t.中国资源的经济产出效率与主要发达国家相比仍有较大差距.2010年的GDP/DMI与GDP/DMC分别为2260,2512元/t.循环物质总量有较大幅度的增长,综合利用率CRR(1)与CRR(2)总体保持上升趋势.CRR(1)从2000年的16%升至2010年的23%,CRR(2)由46.8%升至54.1%. The model of Chinese Economy-wide Material Flow Analysis (CEW-MFA) was built on the basis of evaluating the requirements of management in China. Traditional tools of material flow analysis were complementarily developed. RP in China was defined as a group of four indicators on the basis of CEW-MFA: Direct Material Input (DMI)/GDP, Domestic Material Consumption (DMC)/GDP, Comprehensive Reutilization (CR)/(CR+DMI) and CR/Total Generation (TG).Finally, a pilot calculation of material flow and the four RP indicators of 2000-2010was carried out, as well as the international comparison of the two resource economic outputindicators. The result showed that total amount of current material metabolism of China is large, with DMI approximately 12 billion tons and DMC over 10.7 billion tons in 2010. There is still a considerable gap between RP of China and that of the developed countries. GDP/DMI and GDP/DMC in 2010 are¥2260/t and ¥2512/t, respectively. CR has a significant growth,while both CRR (1) and CRR (2) are overall increasing, with CRR (1) from 16% in 2000 to 23% in 2010 and CRR (2) from 46.8% to 54.1%.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期304-311,共8页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家科技支撑项目(2012BAC03B01)
关键词 资源产出率 经济系统物质流分析 资源综合利用 resource productivity: economy-wide material flow analysis: resource comprehensive reutilization
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1朱远.资源生产率的理论演进与评述[J].兰州学刊,2010(11):55-59. 被引量:5
  • 2Pearce D. Measuring Resource Productivity [R]. Revolutionising Resource Use: Measuring Radical Improvements in Resource Productivity. London: Department of Trade and Industry, Green Alliance, 2001.
  • 3徐一剑.区域经济系统的物质代谢分析模型及其应用[D].北京:清华大学,2007.
  • 4Steinberger J K, Krausmann F. Material and Energy Productivity [J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 2011,45(4):1169- 1176.
  • 5Steinberger J K, Krausmann F, Eisenmenger N. Global patterns of materials use: A socioeconomic and geophysical analysis [J]. Ecological Economics, 2010,69(5): 1148-1158.
  • 6Krausmann F, Erb K-H, Gingrich S, et al. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: A comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008,65(3):471-487.
  • 7Krausmann F, Gingrich S, Eisenmenger N, et al. Growth in global materials use, GDP and population during the 20th century [J]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68(10):2696-2705.
  • 8Bringezu S, Schtitz H, Steger S, et al. International comparison of resource use and its relation to economic growth: The development of total material requirement, direct material inputs and hidden flows and the structure of TMR [J]. Ecological Economics, 2004,51(1/2):97-124.
  • 9Giljum S, Dittrich M, Bringezu S, et al. SERI Working Paper Series [R]. Vienna: SERI, 2010.
  • 10Dahlstr6m K, Ekins P. Combining economic and environmental dimensions: Value chain analysis of UK iron and steel flows [J]. Ecological Economics, 2006,58(3):507-519.

二级参考文献88

共引文献204

同被引文献95

引证文献12

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部