期刊文献+

雷米芬太尼对丙泊酚靶控输注诱导期间效应室浓度及麻醉深度的影响 被引量:4

Effect of remifentanil on the effect compartment concentration and anesthesia depth during propofol target-controlled infusion period
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察丙泊酚靶控输注( TCI)诱导期间泵注雷米芬太尼对丙泊酚效应室浓度( EC)、熵指数和心血管反应的影响。方法:将择期手术患者22例,随机均分为观察组和对照组。2组均以血浆血药浓度为靶目标进行TCI,丙泊酚靶控血药初始浓度设为1.5μg/ml,每4 min增加0.5μg/ml,当改良警觉/镇静评分(MOAA/S)为1分时,对照组和观察组分别静脉泵入0.9%氯化钠注射液和雷米芬太尼0.2μg·kg-1·min-1,当MOAA/S为0分时给予肌松药3 min后行气管插管。观察记录丙泊酚EC、熵指数[反应熵( RE)、状态熵( SE)]、平均动脉压( MAP)和心率( HR),于诱导前( T0)、气管插管前3 min即给肌松药时(T1)、插管即刻(T2)、插管后1 min(T3)。结果:观察组T1-T3丙泊酚EC均低于对照组(P〈0.05-P〈0.01)。2组T1-T3 RE和SE差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。观察组T3 MAP和T1-T3 HR均明显低于对照组(P〈0.01)。结论:丙泊酚TCI诱导期间泵入雷米芬太尼使麻醉深度不变的情况下丙泊酚用量明显减少,血压和HR被抑制更明显。 Objective:To investigate the effect of remifentanil on the effect compartment concentration( EC) ,response entropy( RE) , state entropy(SE) and hemodynamical response during propofol target-controlled infusion(TCI) general anesthesia period. Methods:Twenty-two ASA classⅠ - II patients undergoing elective surgery were randomly divided into the experimental group and control group,eleven cases in each group. In the two groups,the plasma concentration was as the target objective to do TCI. The initial plasma concentration was set to 1. 5μg /ml,increased by 0. 5μg /ml every 4 minutes until the Modified Observer Assessment of Alertness and Sedation(MOAA/S) score=1. The patients in experimental group were received with remifentanil infusion at 0. 2 μg·kg^-1·min^-1, while the patients in control group were received with normal saline at 0. 2 μg·kg^-1 ·min^-1 . Tracheal intubation was operated after 3 minutes with muscular relaxants when MOAA/S was equal to 0. Propofol EC,RE,SE,mean arterial pressure(MAP) and heart rate ( HR) were recorded when anesthesia was inducted with propofol TCI, including before anesthesia ( T0 ) , at the time of infusion with muscle relaxants(T1),at the time of intubation(T2) and at 1 min after intubation(T3). Results:Propofol EC in experimental group was lower than that in control group at T1 -T3(P〈0. 05 to P〈0. 01). There was no significant difference of RE and SE at T1 -T3 between the two groups(P〉0. 05). MAP at T3 and HR at T1 -T3 in experimental group were lower than those in control group(P〈0. 01). Conclusions:The doseage of propofol was decreased obviously during induction of general anesthesia by infusing remifentanil and propofol. At same time,HR and BP were inhibited obviously,but no changes of RE and SE.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2014年第12期1671-1673,共3页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 雷米芬太尼 丙泊酚 靶控输注 熵指数 效应室浓度 remifentanil propofol target-controlled infusion entropy effect compartment concentration
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1于布为,彭章龙,赵永泉.高龄病人异丙酚分步TCI时效应室浓度及BIS的变化[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2002,22(12):711-714. 被引量:44
  • 2Ellarkmatm HK,Laenaenn VM,Alves TM,et al.Spectral entropy and bispectral index as measures of the electroencephalographic effect of sevoflurane[J].Anesthesiology,2004,101(6):1275-1282.
  • 3Davis PJ,Finkel JC,Orr RJ,et al.A randomized,double-blinded study of remifentanil versus fentanyl for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy surgery in pediatric ambulatory surgical patients[J].Anesth Analg,2000,90(7):863-871.
  • 4Elliott P,O'Hare R,Bill KM,et al.Severe cardiovascular depression with remifentanil[J].Analg,2000,91(4):58-61.
  • 5Mertens MJ,Olofsen E,Engber FH,et al.Propofol reduces perioperative remifentnil requirements in a synergistic manner:response surface modeling of perioperative remifentanil propofol interactions[J].Anesthesiology,2003,99(5):347-359.
  • 6Koitabashi T,Johansen JW,Sebel PS,et al.Remifentanil dose/electroencephalogram bispectral response during combined propofol/regional anesthesia[J].Anesth Analg,2002,94:1530-1533.
  • 7O'Hare RA,Mirakhur RK,Reid JE,et al.Recovery from profol anaesthesis supplemented with remifentanil[J].Br J Anaesth,2001,86(6):361-365.
  • 8阮绪广,詹鸿,全小会.熵在全身麻醉深度监测中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(2):121-122. 被引量:3
  • 9Vanluchene AL,Struys MM,Heyse BE,et al.Spectral entropy measurement of patient responsiveness during propofol and remifentanil.A comparison with the bispectral index[J].Br J Anaesth,2004,93(5):645-654.

二级参考文献14

  • 1刘俊杰 赵俊.现代麻醉学(第2版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.307.
  • 2Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, et al. Validity and reliability of the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol, 1990, 10: 244-251.
  • 3Swinhoe CF, Peacock JE, Glen JB, et al. Evaluation of the pre-dictive performance of a "Diprifusor" TCI system. Anaesthesia,1998, 53(Suppl) : 61-67.
  • 4Coetzee JF, Glen JB, Wium CA, et al. Pharmacokinetic model selection for target controlled infusions of propofol. Anesthesiology,1995, 82: 1328-1345.
  • 5Struys MM, Smet TD, Depoorter B, et al. Comparison of plasma compartment versus two methods for effect compartment-controlled target-controlled infusion for propofol. Anesthesiology, 2000, 92:399-406.
  • 6Wakeling HH, Zimmerman JB, Howell S, et al. Targeting effect compartment or central compartment concentration of propofol:what predicts loss of consciousness? Anesthesiology, 1999, 90: 92-97.
  • 7Kearse LA, Rosow C, Zaslavsky A, et al. Bispectral analysis of electroencephalogram predicts conscious processing of information during propofol sedation and hypnosis. Anesthesiology, 1998, 88:25-34.
  • 8Malinga M, Peitfaux F, Lepage JY, et al. Dose-response relati-onship between target-controlled concentration of propofol and bispectral index. Br J Anaesth, 1998, 80(Suppl): A132.
  • 9Ibrahim AE, Taraday JK, Kharasch ED. Bispectral index monitoring during sedation with sevoflurane, midazolam, and propofol.Anesthesiology, 2001, 95: 1151-1159.
  • 10Zhang XS,Roy RJ,Jensen EW.EEG complexity as a measure of depth of anesthesia for patients.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng,2001,48:1424-1433.

共引文献45

同被引文献44

  • 1丁光义.异丙酚复合舒芬太尼在小儿短小手术中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014(27):491-491. 被引量:2
  • 2李成龙,李有武,戴转云,涂学云,王峥,詹育成,汪燕.地佐辛对结肠镜检查时丙泊酚靶控输注麻醉EC_(50)的影响[J].湖北医药学院学报,2013,32(5):426-429. 被引量:5
  • 3Halina Cichoz-Lach,Agata Michalak.Current pathogenetic aspects of hepatic encephalopathy and noncirrhotic hyperammonemic encephalopathy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(1):26-34. 被引量:21
  • 4杨建,张玲英,彭琼.对小儿进行静脉麻醉的研究进展[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(5):1-2. 被引量:3
  • 5Stahl D L, Richard K M, Papadimos T J. Complications of bronchoscopy: A concise synopsis [ J ]. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci, 2015,5(3) :189-195.
  • 6P16cido Paias R, Delgado PecellIn I, Gonz~tlez Valencia JP. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy findings in children with stri- dor in a tertiary hospital[ J ]. Arch Bronconeumol, 2015,5 (15) :374-379.
  • 7Hsu C D, Huang J M, Chuang Y P, et al. Propofol tar- get-controlled infusion for sedated gastrointestinal endos- copy: A comparison ofpropofol alone versus propofol-fent- anyl-midazolam [ J]. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2015, 31 (11) :580-584.
  • 8Green S M, Krauss B S. Target-Controlled Infusions Could Improve the Safety and Efficacy of Emergency Department Propofol Sedation[ J 1- Anesth Analg, 2016,122 ( 1 ) : 283- 284.
  • 9Sapate M, Andurkar U, Markandeya M, et al. To study the effect of injection dexmedetomidine for prevention of pain due to propofol injection and to compare it with in- jection lignocaine [ J ]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2015, 65 (6) :466-469.
  • 10Bian X, Zhou R, Yang Y, et al. Divergent Effect of Dezo- cine, Morphine and Sufentanil on Intestinal Motor Function in Rats[J~. Int J Med Sci, 2015,1201) :848-852.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部