期刊文献+

5级国际预检系统在急诊内科分诊中的应用 被引量:3

The application of 5 level national triage system in emergency medical triage
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨5级国际预检系统(5L NTS)在三级甲等医院急诊内科中实际应用效果。方法:采用随机抽样,观察组依据5L NTS标准进行分诊,对照组采用传统标准分诊,分别观察并比较2组间患者分诊失误率、候诊等候时间及就诊满意度。结果:观察组患者分诊失误率为1.0%,对照组为9.2%,2组患者分诊失误率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组平均每例患者的候诊时间为(7.44±7.00)min,对照组为(10.12±9.44)min,2组差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);观察组对候诊等候时间满意度、医院整体医疗服务满意度和医生诊疗服务满意度均高于对照组(P〈0.05-P〈0.01)。结论:5L NTS能有效降低预检护士分诊失误率,降低不良事件的发生,缩短患者候诊时间,提高了就诊满意度。 Objective:To explore the application effects of 5 level national triage system(5L NTS) in emergency internal medicine in a First-class hospital at Grade 3. Methods:The patients were randomly divided into the experimental group and control group,which were classified using 5 level national triage system and traditional standard triage,respectively. The triage failure rate,waiting time and satisfaction of patient in two groups were observed. Results:The triage failure rates of the experimental group and control group were 1.0% and 9. 2%,respectively,the difference of which was statistically significant(P 〈0. 05). The average waiting time of the experimental group and control group were(7. 44 ±7. 00) min and(10. 12 ±9. 44) min,respectively,the difference of which was statistically significant(P〈0. 05). The satisfaction during waiting,overall hospital medical service satisfaction and physician service satisfaction in experimental group were significantly higher than those in control group(P〈0. 05 to P〈0. 01). Conclusions:Five level national triage system can effectively reduce the nurse triage failure rate and incidence of adverse event, shorten the waiting time of patient,and improve the patients’satisfaction.
出处 《蚌埠医学院学报》 CAS 2014年第12期1718-1721,共4页 Journal of Bengbu Medical College
关键词 分诊 5级国际预检系统 急诊 triage 5 level national triage system emergency medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1马春花,王宝珠.急诊分诊过程管理应用研究[J].护理研究(中旬版),2006,20(12):3197-3199. 被引量:20
  • 2申艳芳.急诊科分诊护士的角色与功能[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(4):294-295. 被引量:70
  • 3Travers DA, Waller AE, Bowling JM, et al. Five level triage system more effective than three level in tertiary emergency depart ment [J]. J Emerg Nurs,2002,28(5) :395 -400.
  • 4Wuerz RC, Milne LW, Eitel DR, et al. Reliability and validity of a new five level triage instrument [ J ]. Acad Emerg Med, 2000, 7(3) :236 -422.
  • 5Lee JW, Jones PS, Zhang XW, et al. Cultural differences in responses to a likert scale [ J ]. Res Nurs Health, 2002,25 (4) : 295 - 306.
  • 6李春盛,李宁,高居忠.大型综合医院急诊科运用ABC模式的实践[J].中华医院管理杂志,2002,18(9):559-561. 被引量:48
  • 7Partovi SN, Nelson BK, Bryan ED, et al. Faculty triage shortens emergency department length of stay [ J ]. Acad Emerg Med, 2001,8(10) :990 -995.
  • 8黄建一,孙红玲,项美华.急诊预检分诊系统概况与进展[J].护理与康复,2007,6(8):519-521. 被引量:41
  • 9Wuerz RC, Travers D, Gilboy N, et al. Implementation and refinement of the emergency seveity index[ J]. Acad Emerg Med, 2001,8(2) :170 - 176.
  • 10Goodacre S, Morris F, Testayohannes B, et al. Sutton should am bulant patients be directed to reception or triage first? [ J]. Emerg Med J,2001,18(6) :441 -443.

二级参考文献22

共引文献182

同被引文献30

引证文献3

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部