期刊文献+

政治风险对我国企业对外直接投资的影响研究 被引量:6

Study on Impacts of Political Risk on Outward Foreign Direct Investment of Chinese Enterprises
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用动态面板数据模型,选取2003~2012年期间我国企业进行对外直接投资的21个主要国家为样本,研究了政治风险对我国企业对外直接投资的影响。通过研究得出:东道国总体政治风险水平越高,则我国企业对其进行的对外直接投资量越小;在衡量政治风险的12个指标中,社会经济状况、投资环境、国内冲突、外部冲突、腐败、军方对政治的影响、制度质量对我国企业对外直接投资有显著的负面影响。政府稳定性、国内冲突、宗教冲突、法律和秩序、种族冲突、民主的稳健性的影响不显著。在此基础上,提出我国企业应通过建立风险预警管理机制、经营本土化等措施,来减少和规避政治风险对我国企业对外直接投资的负面影响。 In this paper, the authors use dynamic panel data model to make a study on impacts of political risk on outward foreign direct investment of Chinese enterprises. 21 main host countries of outward foreign direct investment of Chinese enterprises are chosen during 2003 to 2012 as our sample. It is concluded that the amount of outward foreign direct investment of Chinese enterprises will reduce, when political risk of the host country increases. Among the 12 indicators of political risk, socio-economic conditions, investment profile, internal conflict, external conflict, corruption, influence of the military on politics, and quality of bureaucracy have significant negative effects on outward foreign direct investment of Chinese Enterprises . However, effects of government stability, internal conflict, religious tensions, law and order, tensions among ethnic groups, democratic accountability of the government are relatively less significant. Therefore, our study proposes that in order to avoid political risk, enterprises should strengthen construction of risk warning system, make their management more localized and try to get the government 's support.
作者 潘素昆 代丽
出处 《北方工业大学学报》 2014年第4期9-15,8,共8页 Journal of North China University of Technology
基金 北京市自然科学基金项目"北京企业技术获取型对外投资模式选择与风险防范战略研究"(9122009) 北方工业大学科研人才提升计划青年拔尖人才培育计划(BJRC201315) 北方工业大学青年重点项目
关键词 政治风险 对外直接投资 动态面板数据模型 political risk outward foreign direct investment dynamic panel data model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1韦军亮,陈漓高.政治风险对中国对外直接投资的影响--基于动态面板模型的实证研究[J].经济评论,2009(4):106-113. 被引量:81
  • 2Faik Bilgili, Nadide Sevil HahclTuluce, Ibrahim Do,an. The determinants of FDI in Turkey: A Markov Regime-Switching approach [ J ]. Eco- nomic Modelling,2012(29) : 1161-1169.
  • 3Simon, J. Political risk assessment: Past trends and future prospects [J]. Columbia Journal of World Business, 1982,17(3) :62-71.
  • 4Egger, P. , Winner, H.. Evidence on corruption as an incentive for foreign direct investment[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2005 (21) :932-952.
  • 5谢娟娟,梁莹莹,张加恩.中国对外直接投资模式与决定因素——基于2000—2010年面板数据的实证研究[J].经济问题探索,2013(10):154-163. 被引量:5
  • 6Kuang-Hann Chou, Chien-Hsun Chen, Chao- Cheng Mai. The impact of third-country effects and economic integration on China's outward FDI [J]. Economic Modelling, 2011(28) :2154-2163.
  • 7Alon, I. , Herbert. T. A stranger in a strange land: Micro political risk and the multinational firm[J]. Business Horizons,2009(52) :127-137.
  • 8Philipp Harms, Heinrich W. Ursprung. Do civil and political repression really boost foreign direct investments? Economic Inquiry [J]. 2002,4(40): 651-663.
  • 9Carmen Stoiana, Fragkiskos Filippaios. Dunning' s eclectic paradigm:a holisitic , yet context specific framework for analyzing the determinants of out- ward FDI evidence from international Greek in- vestment [ J ]. International Business Review 2008(17) :349-367.
  • 10商务部、国家统计局等,2012对外直接投资统计公报.

二级参考文献78

同被引文献97

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部