摘要
新颖性判定是科技查新工作的关键,而科研立项查新中新颖性的判定更具有一定的特殊性和难度。面对科研立项查新中经过初步检索判定为不具备新颖性的项目,查新员不应将其"一棍子打死",直接下结论:"该委托项目不具备新颖性",而应该在不违反科技查新规范的前提下,变被动服务为主动服务,凭借自身丰富的查新经验和相关专业知识积累,为委托人提供指导性的意见和建议,协助其重新审视委托项目,确定新的技术要点,开辟新颖性突破口。
Novelty judgment is the key of sci - tech novelty search, and the novelty judgment of research project nov- elty search has certain particularity and difficulty. Facing a research project not with novelty judged after preliminary retrieval in research project novelty search, the sci -tech novelty search personnel should not draw a conclusion di- rectly: "the research project does not have the novelty ". He should change from passive to active service without violating sci -tech novelty search work experience and accumulated and seek a novehv breakthrouzh. regulation, provide clients with instructional opinions and suggestions by his rich expertise, assist them to restudy the research project, identify new technical points
出处
《晋图学刊》
2014年第6期33-35,42,共4页
Shanxi Library Journal
关键词
科技查新
科研立项
新颖性
sci - tech novelty search
research project
novelty