期刊文献+

戴维森从塔斯基那里继承了什么?——戴维森与塔斯基的“真”理论之比较 被引量:3

What Does Davidson Inherit from Tarski?——A Comparison Between Davidson's and Tarski's Theory of Truth
原文传递
导出
摘要 戴维森从塔斯基的Tx模式出发,得出一种基于经验的"真"理论,即由经验证据确立Tx语句的真实性,进而得出关于彻底解释的意义理论。戴维森的"真"理论不仅改变了塔斯基理论的逻辑性质,而且把塔斯基从意义到真的研究方向倒转过来,变成从真到意义的研究进路。戴维森从塔斯基那里真正继承的是"真"的初始概念,而塔斯基却误把Tx模式当作真之定义。 Davidson starts from Tarski's Tx-schema and gets a theory of truth based on experience,and thereby reaches the theory of meaning about the radical interpretation. Davidson's theory of truth not only changes the logical property of Tarski's theory,but also reverses Tarski's research direction from meaning to truth by the one from truth to meaning. What Davidson inherits from Tarski is just the primitive concept of truth,although Tarski himself takes Tx-schema wrongly as the definition of truth.
作者 陈晓平
出处 《科学技术哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期1-8,共8页 Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
基金 国家社科基金项目(10BZX020) 广东省社会科学"十一五"规划项目(09C-01) 广东省高校人文社科基地重大项目(10JDXM72001) 中国逻辑学会学术研究重点项目(13CLZD001)
关键词 戴维森 塔斯基 初始概念 彻底解释 Davidson Tarski truth primitive concept radical interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Tarski A. The Semantic Conception of Truth [ J ]. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1944,4 ( 3 ) :341 - 376.
  • 2Tarski A. The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages [ M ]. Oxford : Clarendon press, 1956 : 152 - 278.
  • 3陈晓平.对塔斯基“真”理论的批评与重建[J].逻辑学研究,2014,7(2):62-80. 被引量:5
  • 4戴维森.真理、意义与方法[M].牟博,编译,北京:商务印书馆,2012.
  • 5Davidson D. The Folly of Trying to Define Truth [ M ] //Lynch M P. The Nature of Truth: Classic and Contemporary Perspec- tives. Cambridge :The MIT Press ,2001:637.

二级参考文献6

  • 1A.Tarski, 1933, The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages, Oxford: Clarendon Press, translated by J. H. Woodger in Logic, Semantic, Metamathematics, 1956.
  • 2A.Tarski, 1944, "The semantic conception of truth: And the foundations of semantics", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 4(3): 341-376.
  • 3G. Frege, 2003, "On sense and reference", in A. Sullivan (ed.), Logicism andthe Philos- ophy of Language: Selections from Frege and Russell, pp. 175-192, Canada: Broadview Press.
  • 4A.P.马蒂尼奇,语言哲学,牟博等译,1998年,北京:商务印书馆.
  • 5陈晓平.真之符合论与真之等同论辨析[J].哲学分析,2014,5(1):118-130. 被引量:4
  • 6陈晓平.真之统一多元论[J].科学技术哲学研究,2014,31(2):1-8. 被引量:4

共引文献4

同被引文献13

  • 1王路.论“真”与“真理”[J].中国社会科学,1996(6):113-125. 被引量:23
  • 2王路.涵义与意谓——理解弗雷格[J].哲学研究,2004(7):65-71. 被引量:6
  • 3维特根斯坦,L.逻辑哲学论[M].贺绍甲,译.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 4王路,R.尚兹,P.霍维奇,M.威廉姆斯,D.M.阿姆斯特朗,C.迈克金.真与意义理论[J].世界哲学,2007(6):46-70. 被引量:7
  • 5Tarski, Alfred. The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1956: 152-278.
  • 6Davidson, Donald. Inquiries into Truth and Interpreta- tion [M]. Cambridge, M.A.- Oxford University Press, 1991: 1-65.
  • 7Frege, Gottlob. The Frege Reader [M]. Oxford, Britain: Blackwell Publishers, 1997: 151-171.
  • 8Chomsky,Noam.Syntactic Structures [M].New York: Mou- ton de Gruyter, 2002:18-25.
  • 9Davidson, Donald. Truth and Predication [M]. London: Harvard University Press, 2005:7-75.
  • 10Russell, Bertrand.On Denoting[J].Mind,1905 (14):479- 493.

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部