期刊文献+

委托作品权利归属法律适用标准之探讨 被引量:10

Explanation of the Ownership of Copyright in Commissioned Works
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有效实现委托作品制度目的,有赖于权利归属制度中委托创作关系、委托创作的合同约定、委托人获取的权益三个核心要素的准确适用。就委托创作关系的判断而言,有必要对比雇佣创作关系和合作创作关系;就委托作品的合同主体而言,不应限制为自然人;就合同约定的形式要件而言,应是一种书面形式;就合同约定的范围而言,应包括署名权除外的精神性权利;就委托人的"特定目的范围使用权"而言,应对使用权的期限、种类及性质进行恰当解释,从而实现委托人和受托人利益平衡。 The copyright law regulates ownership of copyright in commissioned works, and it includes the most important three factors, the relationship of commissioned artists creating, the contract for commission and the benefit of commission party. Therefore, we should supply explicit statutory provisions dealt with works made for hire, joint works and works made under commission. The commissioned party is not only one person, but also includes other organizations. The commissioned contract should be signed in written form and include the moral right of author except the right to have the author's name associated with the work. Furthermore, the commissioning organization acquires the right to use the work only within the specific purpose in the contract with the author, but the duration, category and nature should be explained by the court and experts. The rights are granted primarily as a balance for the benefit of the commissioner and the private interests of authors.
作者 陈明涛
出处 《社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期106-115,共10页 Journal of Social Sciences
关键词 委托作品 权利归属 委托作品合同约定 特定目的范围使用权 Commissioned Works Ownership of Copyright in Commissioned Works the Commissioned Contract the Right to Use the Work Only within the Specific Purpose
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1周艳敏.“为他人创作之作品”的著作权归属探析——对我国著作权法相关条目修改的建议[J].出版发行研究,2011(7):61-64. 被引量:4
  • 2See Brattleboro Publishing Co. v. Winmill Publishing, 369 F. 2d 565, 567 (2d Cir 1966).
  • 3Aldon Accessories v. Spiegel, Inc., 738 F. 2d 548,552(2d Cir. N.Y. 1984).
  • 4Dumas v. Gommerman, 865 F. 2d 1093,1094 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989).
  • 5Dumas v. Gommerman, 865 F. 2d 1093,1101 (9th Cir. Cal. 1989).
  • 6Cmty. for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid, 490 U.S. 733-736(U. S. 1989), 750.
  • 7Eckert v. Hurley Chicago Co., 638 F. Supp. 699, 700-701(N. D. Ill. 1986) , 704.
  • 8See Laura G. Lape, A Narrow View Of Creative Cooperation: "The Current State Of Joint Work Doctrine" ,61 Alb. L. Rev. 43 (1997), Childress v. Taylor, 945 F. 2d 500,508 (2d Cir. N.Y. 1991).
  • 9Aalmuhammed v. Lee, 202 F. 3d 1227 (9th Cir. Cal. 2000), 1234.
  • 10Erickson v. Trinity Theatre, 13 F. 3d 1061 (7th Cir. Ill. 1994), 1071, 1072.

二级参考文献6

共引文献64

同被引文献54

引证文献10

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部