摘要
对于中国本土管理研究应该采用什么样的哲学基础这一问题,黄光国和李平有着截然相反的判断,他们的观点可以看成是对立的两极。基于此,试图在这两个极端之间开辟一条中间路线:既不完全同意黄光国关于本土研究必须采用西方科学哲学的判断,也不认同李平关于中国传统哲学的智慧哲学诠释,而是通过融会阴阳思想、儒道哲学、波尔互补原理及黑格尔辩证逻辑等中西哲学元素,尝试建构中国本土管理研究的道理论、认识论和方法论。这样的一种哲学观可以被称之为X整合主义。
Regarding philosophical foundation of Chinese indigenous management research, Prof. Kwang-Kuo Hwang of Taiwan University and Prof. Peter P. Li of Copenhagen Business School have contradictory judgments. Their opinions represent two opposite poles. This paper tries to offer a mid- dle route between these two poles. The author does not fully agree with Hwang's argument that Chi- nese indigenous management research must adopt Western philosophies of science, nor does he agree with Li^s philosophy of wisdom interpretation of Chinese traditional philosophy. By integrating multi- ple philosophical elements rooted in China and the West, such as, Chinese Yin Yang thinking, Dao- ism, Confucianism, Bohr's complementarity principle, and Hegel's dialectic logic, this paper tries to construct the daoliology, epistemology and methodology of Chinese indigenous management research. The author names this philosophical perspective as X-integrationism.
出处
《管理学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期157-166,共10页
Chinese Journal of Management
关键词
本土
管理研究
科学哲学
阴阳
中庸
indigenous
management research
philosophy of science
Yin Yang
Zhong Yong