期刊文献+

人口集聚对区域劳动生产率的异质性影响 被引量:55

The Effect of Population Agglomeration on Heterogeneity of Regional Labor Productivity
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国区域间的空间异质性使得传统的空间同质性假设难以合理解释人口聚集对劳动生产率的影响究竟几何。根据2000—2012年的省级面板数据,利用空间面板回归和门槛面板回归进行异质性检验,考察人口聚集度与劳动生产率之间的非线性关系。研究表明,人口聚集度的上升具有提高劳动生产率的效应,但表现出地区差异:人口聚集对提升劳动生产率的效应呈东、中、西部递减态势;人口聚集度与劳动生产率之间呈“倒U”形关系,并具有显著的三重非线性门槛特征,印证了“威廉姆森假说”。文章政策涵义明显:实施分类指导的人口政策,对于处于“倒U”形不同阶段的城市制定不同的人口政策。同时中西部地区城镇化过程中尤其要注重提升教育水平和吸引人才,以改善同质低端劳动力过度聚集带来的劳动生产率损失。 The conventional spatial homogeneity hypothesis is unable to account for the extent to which population agglomeration affects labor productivity in the context of spatial heterogeneity in China. Using provincial panel data from 2000 to 2012, a heterogeneity test is performed with spatial panel regression and threshold panel regression to investigate the non-linear relationship between population agglomeration and labor productivity. Population agglomeration tends to improve labor productivity but with marked regional differences, showing an inverted U shape relationship which has triple nonlinear threshold characteristics. Differentiated Population policies need to be carried out for different cities according to their stage in the inverted U shape relationship. During the urbanization of Midwest China, education policies are especially important to address the loss of labor productivity due to the excessive agglomeration of the homogeneous low-grade labor force.
作者 陈心颖
出处 《人口研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期85-95,共11页 Population Research
基金 国家社科基金青年项目<新型城镇化背景下乡城人口流动迁移与"人"的城镇化问题研究>(项目号:13CRK021)的阶段性成果
关键词 人口集聚 劳动生产率 异质性 面板门槛回归 Population Agglomeration, Labor Productivily, Heterogeneily, Panel Threshold Regression
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Alejandro D. B. 2005. Agglomeration Economies, Economic Growth and the New Economic Geography in Mexico. Econ WPA in its Series Urban/Regional :NO. 0508001 28- 32.
  • 2A. J. Venables. 2006. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data : Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies 2:277 - 297.
  • 3Bairoch, P. 1993. Economics and World History:Myths and Paradoxes. Chicago, IL:University of Chicago Press 59- 67.
  • 4Brtllhart,M. and F. Sbergami. 2009. Agglomeration and Growth :Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Urban Economics 1:48- 63.
  • 5Edquist, C. 1997. Systems of Innovation Approaches:Their Emergence and Characteristics. Pp. 1 -35 in Systems of Innova- tion : Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, edited by C. Edquist. London : Pinter 42 - 59.
  • 6Fujita, M. and J. F. Thisse. 2003. Does Geographical Agglomeration Foster Economic Growth? And Who Gains and Loses from It? Japanese Economic Review 2:121 -145.
  • 7Hohenberg, P. M. and L. H. Lees. 1985. The Making of Urban Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 1000 - 1950.
  • 8Henderson,V. 2003. The Urbanization Process and Economic Growth:The So-What Question. Journal of Economic Growth 1:47 -71.
  • 9Lundvall, B. A. and B. Johnson. 1994. The Learning Economy. Journal of Industrial Studies. 2:23 -42.
  • 10Rosen,K. T. , M. Resnick. 1980. The Size Distribution of Cities :An Explanation of the Pareto Law and Primacy. Journal of Urban Economics. 2:165 - 186.

二级参考文献170

共引文献1390

同被引文献823

引证文献55

二级引证文献518

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部