任务重复对第二语言学习者口语产出的影响被引量：2

The Effects of Task Repetition on Second Language English Learners' Oral Production

下载PDF

导出

摘要人的注意力资源是有限的,在有限的注意力资源下,语言学习者的口语产出总是遵循优先处理意义而不是形式的原则。在注意力资源有富余的情况下,才会把足够的注意力资源放在语言形式的处理上。通过对某大学随机抽取的60名学生进行研究进一步证明了信息处理理论,相同素材任务重复对提高语言学习者的口语流利性和准确性有积极作用,却没有提高语言学习者口语的复杂性。不同素材任务重复只对语言学习者口语流利性上有促进作用,但却没有提高其口语的准确性和复杂性。这一研究结果将为外语口语教学提供更好的借鉴。 People＇s attention resources are limited,language learners always follow the principle--give meaning priority rather than form. When the attention resource is surplus,enough attention resources is given to process language form. Through the research of 60 students in a university randomly selected,it further proves the information processing theory. The same material task repetition has a positive effect on the improvement of language learners＇ oral fluency and accuracy,without improving the complexity of Language.Different material task repetition only promote for language learners＇ oral fluency,not accuracy and complexity. This research result will provide a better reference for oral teaching.

作者朱秀梅王林艳肖武云

机构地区湘南学院外国语学院

出处《湘南学院学报》 2014年第6期66-70,共5页 Journal of Xiangnan University

基金湖南省普通高等学校教学改革项目(NO.湘教通发[2010]243号)

关键词任务重复大学英语口语:信息处理理论 task repetition college English oral English the information processing theory

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1Skehan,P.A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning.Oxford:Oxford University Press,1998:169-178.
2杜鹃.任务重复对中国大学英语学习者口语产出的影响[D].兰州:兰州大学,2008:5-45.
3Nunan.David.Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1989:54-65.
4Harmer,J.The Practice of English Language Teaching[M].New York:Longman,1988:78-90.
5Jack C.Richards,Interchange(Third Edition)[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007:77-83.
6岳守国.任务语言教学法:概要、理据及运用[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):64-67. 被引量：399
7Rod Ellis,Task-based language learning and teaching[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2003:202-215.

二级参考文献16

1刘道义.新综合英语教材的特点[J].中小学外语教研通讯,2001,(1).
2Arnold, J. 1999. Affect in Language Learning [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3Ehrman, M. & Z. Dornyei. 1998. Interpersonal Dynamics in Second Language Education : The Visible and Invisible Classroom [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4Feez, S. 1998. Text-based Syllabus Design [M]. Sydney: N-tional Center for English Teaching and Research.
5Lemke, J. L. 1985. Using Language in the Classroom [M].Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
6Long , M. & G. Crookes. 1991. Three approaches to task-based syllabus design [J]. TESOL Quarterly 26: 27-55.
7Naiman, N. &H. H. Stern. 1978. TheG, ood Language Learner [ M ]. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
8Pica T., R. Kanagy & J. Falodun. 1993. Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction [A]. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.). Tasks and LanguageLearning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
9Plough, I. & S. Gass. 1993. Interlocutor and task familiarity:Effect on interactional structure [A]. In G. Crookes & S.Gass (eds.). Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Clevedun: Multilingual Matters.
10Richards, J. C. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.