期刊文献+

不同直径牙胚细胞增殖和骨向分化能力的评估 被引量:1

Proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of tooth germ cells with different diameters
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较大鼠不同直径牙胚细胞增殖和骨向分化能力的差异。方法:酶消化法分离、培养SD大鼠牙胚细胞,经13μm标准细胞筛分选后获得大、小2种直径的细胞;并分别采用MTT法检测2种细胞的增殖能力;碱性磷酸酶(ALP)试剂盒、茜素红染色法及qRT-PCR检测两者的骨向分化能力。结果:小细胞的增殖能力较低(P<0.05);培养3、7 d后,小细胞组的ALP活性均明显高于大细胞组(P<0.05);培养14 d后,小细胞组钙化结节数量明显高于大细胞组;qRT-PCR检测结果显示,小细胞组中Ocn、Osx、Runx2各矿化相关基因的表达水平均明显高于大细胞组(P<0.05)。结论:牙胚细胞中直径小于13μm的细胞比直径大于13μm的细胞增殖活性低,分化能力强。 AIM: To compare the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of rat tooth germ cells ( rT-GCs) with different diameters.METHODS:rTGCs were isolated enzymatically from Sprague-Dawley rats and divided into larger and smaller populations using a 13 μm cell sieve.MTT assay was performed to evaluate the cell prolifera-tion.Alkaline phosphotase ( ALP) kits, alizarin red staining and quantitative PCR were used to investigate the osteo-genic differentiation capacity of the cells.RESULTS: The larger rTGCs( rTGCs-Large) showed greater proliferation rate than the smaller counterparts ( rTGCs-Small) .However, rTGCs-Small group presented higher ALP activity at 3 and 7 d after culture and more calcified nodules than rTGCs-Large group at 14 d after culture.Moreover, rTGCs-Small group expressed stronger osteogenic markers Ocn, Osx and Runx2 than rTGCs-Large group.CONCLUSION:rTGCs-Small have lower proliferation capacity but stronger osteogenic differentiation potential than rTGCs-Large group.
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第12期687-691,共5页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81371144)
关键词 牙胚细胞 细胞直径 增殖 分化 proliferation differentiation tooth germ cells diameter
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1金岩,贺慧霞,王亦菁,史俊南.成体干细胞在口腔再生医学的研究进展[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2004,14(10):539-543. 被引量:7
  • 2包柳郁,金岩,史俊南,牛忠英,汪平,赵守亮,郝建军,王捍国.用人牙源性上皮和间充质细胞构建组织工程化牙齿样结构的实验研究[J].牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志,2004,14(11):607-611. 被引量:6
  • 3Duailibi MT, Duailibi SE, Young CS, et al. Bioengineered Teeth from Cultured Rat Tooth Bud Cells [J]. J Dent Res, 2004, 83(7):523-529.
  • 4Pispa J, Thesleff I. Mechanisms of ectodermal organogenesis [J]. Dev Biol, 2003, 262(2):195-205.
  • 5Cobourne MT, Sharpe PT. Tooth and jaw: molecular mechanisms of patterning in the first branchial arch [J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2003, 48(1):1-14.
  • 6Young CS, Terada S, Vacanti JP, et al. Tissue engineering of complex tooth structure on biodegradable polymer scaffolds [J]. J Dent Res, 2002, 81(10):695-700.
  • 7Ohazama A, Modino SAC, Miletich I, et al. Stem-cell-based Tissue Engineering of Murine Teeth [J]. J Dent Res, 2004, 83(7):518-523.
  • 8Ohazama A, Courtney JM, Sharpe PT. Opg, rank, and rankl in tooth development: co-ordination of odontogenesis and osteogenesis [J]. J Dent Res, 2004, 83(3):241-244.
  • 9Batouli S, Miura M, Brahim J, et al. Comparison of stem-cell-mediated osteogenesis and dentinogenesis [J]. J Dent Res, 2003, 82(12):976-981.
  • 10Gratzner HG. Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo-and 5-iododeoxyu-ridine: A new reagent for detection of DNA replication[J]. Science,1982, 218(4571):474-475.

共引文献17

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部