期刊文献+

基于区间数AHP的我国新型城镇化质量评价研究 被引量:5

Chinese New Urbanization Quality Evaluation Based on Interval Number AHP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 城镇化是一个动态发展的历史过程,新时期如何充分理解新型城镇化的内涵并科学评价城镇化的质量,对于正确把握城镇化发展方向,实现战略转型具有重要意义。基于新型城镇化的内涵,构建以城市化规模、区域竞争优势、城市民生、城乡统筹、区域生态为一级指标的新型城镇化质量评价指标体系,并采用区间数的AHP方法求取指标权重,对我国30地区的新型城镇化质量进行实证研究。结果表明,一是我国30个地区的新型城镇化质量差距较大,普遍较低,有70%的地区得分低于50分。新型城镇化质量得分最高的是上海,其次是北京、天津,其值分别为78.74,73.60和67.94。甘肃省最低,其值仅为25.87。二是我国新型城镇化质量呈现出从东到西依次递减的区域性差异。该研究可为我国新型城镇化建设提供理论参考。 Urbanization is a historical process of dynamic development. In the new era, it is of great significance to fully understand the meaning of the new urbanization and evaluate the quality of urbanization scientifically for grasping the development direction correctly and achieving strategic transformation. Based on a new connotation of urbanization, we constructed a new urbanization quality evaluation system that took urbanization scale, regional competitive advantage, urban livelihood, urban and rural, regional ecological as one class indicators. In addition, we did empirical researches on the quality of the new urbanization of China's 30 regions using AHP. The results showed that, firstly, the gap of quality of urbanization amaong China's 30 regions was large. The quality of urbanization ranked in the top was Shanghai, followed by Beijing, Tianjin, their values were 78.74, 73.60 and 67.94. Gansu Province was the lowest, and its value is only 25.87. Secondly, it showed regional differences from east to west in descending order. The study provided a theoretical reference for the new urbanization in China.
出处 《农业经济与管理》 2015年第1期64-70,91,共8页 Agricultural Economics and Management
基金 山东省教育厅人文社会科学项目(J08WF65)
关键词 新型城镇化 质量 区间数AHP 指标体系 评价 new urbanization quality interval AHP indicator system evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献72

共引文献834

同被引文献66

引证文献5

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部