正义的救赎反思——从“洞穴奇案”谈起

Reflection on the Redemption of Justice——Beginning with “The Case of Speluncean Explorers”

在学界盛传的一个旷世疑难案件,即"洞穴奇案"中存在的复杂情形使得无论是有罪判决或是无罪判决甚至是拒绝裁判皆有值得诟病之处,以至于"望案兴叹"。在价值多元化的社会试图以一种理论来统一所有人的正义观念不仅违背现实也不合常理,而融合正义论与功利主义思想各自的优势则是走向正义救赎的必由之路,即基于程序正义选择下的功利主义是解决此类疑难案例的最优选择。

There is a hard case, namely ＂The case of Speluncean Explorers＂, which widely disseminates in the academic circles because of its complexity. It is unreasonable whether the case is given the verdict of guilty or not, even it is refused to referee, as a result, people bemoan t34he inadequacy in the face of the case. The at- tempt to unify all the concepts of justice with a theory is not only contrary to reality but also irrational in the so- ciety of diverse values while the integration of the theories of justice and utilitarianism is the only way to the Redemption of Justice. In another word, utilitarianism based on the procedural justice is the optimal choice for solving such a difficult case.