期刊文献+

论美国政府信息公开中商业秘密信息免除公开的司法审查 被引量:1

The Judicial Review of Confidential Business Information in American Government's Information Disclosure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国《信息自由法》对商业秘密信息免除公开作了明确具体的限制性规定,商业秘密分为贸易秘密和商业或金融信息,并在司法实践中分别采取不同的认定标准。同时,联邦法院在司法审查中总结出审查商业秘密文件的决策树,文件的保密地位与申请人的身份、动机无关,以及在司法审查中证明责任、审理方式等方面的特殊性。文章主要探讨美国商业秘密文件免除公开的认定标准和司法审查方法对我国政府信息公开司法审查实践的启示意义。 The freedom of information act has made a clear, specific and restrictive provision to the exemption for confidential business information, and confidential business information is divided into two parts, trade secrets and commercial or financial information. However, these two kinds of information are divided by different standards in judicial practice. At the same time, federal court has summarized a Decision Tree to review confi- dential business information in judicial review. The confidential status of document is irrelevant to the identity and motivation of applicant, and it is also unrelated to the specificity of proof burden and trial method in judi- cial review. Discussing the judging standard and trial method of the exemption for American confidential business information will enlighten the practice of judicial review to information disclosure of our state government.
作者 杨建生
出处 《河南财经政法大学学报》 2015年第1期133-143,共11页 Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金 国家社科基金项目"政府信息公开司法审查的原理与技术研究"的系列成果之一(项目编号:13BFX043)
关键词 美国 政府信息公开 商业秘密 司法审查 America governmental information disclosure business secret judicial review
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1See 5 U. S. C. A. § 552(b) (4):trade secrets and commercial or linancia/ mtormatlon obtained trom a person and privileged or confidential.
  • 2Public Citizen Health Research Group v. F. D. A. ,704 F. 2d 1280 (D. C. Cir. 1983).
  • 3Chrysler Corp. v. Brown,441 U. S. 281 (1979).
  • 4王名扬.美国行政法[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2005.784,854.
  • 5Public Citizen Health Research Group v. F. D. A. ,704 F. 2d 1280 ( D. C. Cir. 1983).
  • 6Center for Auto Safety v. National Highway Traffic Safety Admin. ,244 F. 3d 144 ( D. C. Cir. 2001 ).
  • 7Consumers Union of U. S. ,Inc. v. Veterans Administration,301 F. Supp. 796 (S. D. N. Y. 1969).
  • 8Soueie v. David,448 F. 2d 1067 ( D. C. Cir. 1971 ).
  • 9Sharyland Water Supply Corp. v. Block,755 F. 2d 397 (5th Cir. 1985).
  • 10Anderson v. Department of Health and Human Services,907 F. 2d 936 (10th Cir. 1990).

共引文献69

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部