摘要
作为一种隐蔽的性暴力,"婚内强奸"在世界范围内普遍存在。在国内关于"婚内强奸"的诸多学说之中,似乎唯有"有条件肯定说"与"两罪说"能够在惩罚犯罪与保障人权之间求得平衡。而在经历了由"非罪"到"罪"的转变之后,大陆法系和英美法系国家或地区多数将"婚内强奸"以强奸罪论之。在我国法治发展之背景下,"婚内强奸"的确有别于"普通强奸",但在罪刑法定原则之下,无论是立于形式理性还是实质理性,"婚内强奸"都实难以婚姻关系的存续为由而肯定强奸罪之"丈夫豁免",故我国刑法第236条当对强奸罪作出完善性表述。
As a hidden sexual violence, ＂marital rape＂ exists all over the world. In many domestic theories about ＂marital rape＂, it seems that only the theory of ＂condition＂ and ＂two offences＂ can find a balance between the punishment of crime and protection of human rights. After undergoing the transformation from ＂non - crime＂ to ＂crime＂, the majority of civil law and common law countries or regions treat＂ marital rape＂ as the crime of rape. Un- der the background of our county＇s development of governed by law,＂marital rape＂ is distinct from the ＂ordinary rape＂ exactly. However, under the principle of a legally prescribed punishment, whether it is based on the formal reason or substantive rationality,＂ marital rape＂ is really hard to admit ＂husband exemption＂ of the crime of rape in the name of the duration of relationship of marriage . Thus, Article 236 of our country＇ s criminal law should make a perfect description to the crime of rape.
出处
《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期89-96,118,共9页
Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词
婚内强奸
性自主权
强奸罪
丈夫豁免
人权
marital rape
the sexual autonomy
the crime of rape
＂husband exemption＂
human rights
