期刊文献+

自然的数学化 关于科学革命编史纲领的探讨 被引量:11

The Mathematization of Nature: An Inquiry into a Historiographical Issue of the Scientific Revolution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章在评论柯瓦雷、韦斯特佛和弗洛里斯·科恩等三位科学史家编史纲领的基础上,指出科学革命是一个有结构的动力学进程,该结构由数学化表征、本体论承诺和发现型实验三大主题交织而成。这三大主题之间的相互限制和相互促进,构成了科学革命的主线。自然的数学化只能从数学表征这个角度来理解,并且不能脱离其他两大主题而独立发展。数学化表征既依赖于我们关于物理实在的本体论承诺,同时又启迪着我们去修正原有的本体论承诺。 On the basis of a critical review of the historiographical viewpoints of three historians, namely Alexerder Koyre, Richard Westfall and Floris Cohen, the author argues that the scientific revolution is a dynamically structured process. The structure of the scientific revolution consists of three themes the mathematical representation, the ontological commitment, and the experiment for discovery. The dynamics comes from the interactive restriction and promotion among the three relatively independent themes. The mathematization of nature should be understood as the mathematical representation of nature and would reach an impasse when detached from the advancement of the other two themes. On the one hand, the mathematical representation depends on our ontological commitment of the physical reality; on the other hand, the mathematical representation inspires us to modify the accepted ontological commitment.
作者 郝刘祥
出处 《科学文化评论》 2014年第5期5-23,共19页 Science & Culture Review
基金 中国科学院规划与决策科技支持系统建设项目"科学文化的边界问题及其历史根源的研究"资助的系列研究成果之一
关键词 科学革命 编史学 数学化表征 本体论承诺 发现型实验 机械论 微粒论 超距作用力 the scientific revolution, historiography, mathematical representation, ontological commitment, experiment for discovery, mechanism, the corpuscular theory, action at distance
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1柯瓦雷,刘胜利译.《伽利略研究》.北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 2默顿2000.《十七世纪英格兰的科学、技术与社会》.范岱年等译.北京:商务印书馆.
  • 3霍伊卡1999.《宗教与现代科学的兴起》.邱仲辉等译.成都:四川人民出版社.
  • 4Dobbs, B. J. T. 1975. The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy, or The Hunting of the Greene Lyon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Westfall, R. S. 1971. The Construction of Modern Science: Mechanisms and Mechanics. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  • 6Burtt, E. A. 1980. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • 7科恩,I.B.1999.《牛顿革命》.颜峰等译.南昌:江西教育出版社.
  • 8张卜天.从古希腊到近代早期力学含义的演变[J].科学文化评论,2010,7(3):38-53. 被引量:8
  • 9Koyre, A. 1968. Metaphysics and Measurement." Essays in Scientific Revolutions. London: Chapman & Hall.
  • 10郝刘祥.希腊化时代科学与技术之间的互动[J].科学文化评论,2014,11(1):25-39. 被引量:2

二级参考文献41

  • 1Aristotle 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. The Revised Oxford Translation. 2 volumes. Edited by Jonathan Bames. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 2Bennett, J. 2006. The Mechanical Arts. The Cambridge History of Science, vol. 3. ed. Katharine Park and Lorraine Daston. Cambridge University Press. 673 - 695.
  • 3Berryman S. 2009. The Mechanical Hypothesis in Ancient Greek Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Boas, M. 1952. The Establishment of the Mechanical Philosophy. O, ql'fl"S, vol. 10. 412 - 541.
  • 5Burtt, E. A. The Metaphysical Foundations of Modem Physical Science. New York: Doubleday, 1954.
  • 6Dijksterhuis, E. J. 1961. The Mechanization of the World Picture. trans, by C. Dikshoom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 7Drake, S. and Drabkin, I. E. ed. and trans. 1969. Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy: Selections from Tartaglia, Benedetti, Guido Ubaldo, and Galileo. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
  • 8Gabbey, A. 1992. Newton' s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy: A Treatise on "Mechanics" ? The Investigation of Difticult Things. ed. P.M. Harman and Alan Shapiro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 305 - 322.
  • 9Gabbey, A. 1993. Between ars and philosophia naturalis: Reflections on the Historiography of Early Modem Mechanics. Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modem Europe. ed. J.V. Field and F. James. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 133 - 145.
  • 10Gabbey, A. 1998. New Doctrines of Motion. The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy. ed. Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers, New York & Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 649 - 679.

共引文献13

同被引文献26

引证文献11

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部