期刊文献+

正畸治疗联合认知-行为干预疗法在治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病中的疗效分析 被引量:4

Curative effect analysis of orthodontic treatment combined with cognition-behavior intervention therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究比较正畸治疗联合认知-行为干预对颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)青壮年患者的临床疗效。方法 48例TMD患者随机分成实验组和对照组,每组24例。实验组患者进行正畸治疗联合认知-行为干预,对照组患者单纯进行正畸治疗。比较两组和治疗效果。结果对照组治愈12例,治愈率为50.0%;有效6例,占25.0%;无效6例,占25.0%;成功率为75.0%。实验组治愈14例,治愈率为58.3%;有效9例,占37.5%;无效1例,占4.2%;成功率95.8%。实验组疗效优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在正畸治疗TMD青壮年患者中,有必要考虑社会心理因素,并对症给予心理疏导。 Objective To study and compare the clinical effect of orthodontic treatment combined with cognition-behavior intervention in the treatment of young adults with temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Methods A total of 48 TMD patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, with 24 cases in each group. The experimental group received orthodontic treatment combined with cognition-behavior intervention, while the control group received orthodontic treatment alone. Curative effects of the two groups were compared. Results There were 12 cured eases in the controlgroup, and the cure rate was 50.0%. Among them, there were 6 effective cases, accounting for 25.0%, and 6 ineffective cases, accounting for 25.0%. The success rate was 75.0%. The cured cases in the experimental group were 14 cases, and the cure rate was 58.3%. There were 9 effective cases, accounting for 37.5%, and 1 ineffective case, accounting for 4.2%. The success rate was 95,8%. The curative effect of the experimental group was better than that of the control group, and the difference had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion In the orthodontic treatment of young adults with TMD, it is necessary for consideration of the social-psychological factors and providing symptomatic psychological counseling.
出处 《中国实用医药》 2015年第2期37-38,共2页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 颞下颌关节紊乱病 正畸治疗 认知-行为干预 Temporomandibular disorders Orthodontic treatment Cognition-behavior intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献19

  • 1王虎,史宗道,雷荀灌,陈铀,陈亚平.髁突位置变化与关节盘移位的关系──断层片和造影断层片的比较[J].华西口腔医学杂志,1995,13(3):190-193. 被引量:9
  • 2王旭,焦建平,朱亚夫,范若莉,刘新月.颞颌关节紊乱征在青年中的流行病学调查[J].河北医科大学学报,1996,17(6):335-336. 被引量:9
  • 3蔡雄鑫,医学心理学,1984年
  • 4OKESON J P.Orofacial pain:guidelines for assessment,diagnosis,and management.Chicago:Quintessence,1996:131-134.
  • 5邱蔚六.口腔颌面外科学.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005:304-306.
  • 6SHOU Y Y,CHANG C.An epidemiological study of temporomandibular-disorders in university students of Taiwan.Community Dent Oral Epidemiol,1992,20(1):43-47.
  • 7Lin J,Gu Y.Preliminary investigation of nonsurgical treatment of severe skeletal Class Ⅲ malocclusion in the permanent dentition[J].Angle Orthod,2003,73(4):401-410.
  • 8Covell DA,Trammell DW,Boero RP,et al.A cephalometric study of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance[J].Angle Orthod,1999,69(4):311-320.
  • 9Pullinger A,Hollender L,Angeles L,et al.Variation in condylefossa relationship according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms[J].Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol,1986,62(6):719-727.
  • 10Ronquillo H,Guay J,Tallents R,et al.Comparision of internal derangements with condyle-fossa relationships,horizontal and vertical overlap,and Angle Class[J].J Craniomandib Disord,1988,2(3):137-140.

共引文献23

同被引文献29

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部