期刊文献+

自体骨髓间充质干细胞移植治疗难治性肝硬化腹水患者的临床疗效观察 被引量:4

Clinical observation of hepatic cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites undergoing autologous bone marrow masenchymal stem cells transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察自体骨髓间充质干细胞(BMSC)移植治疗肝硬化难治性腹水的疗效及安全性。方法对2010年9月至2013年9月入住南京总医院消化内科经正规利尿、补充白蛋白达3个月以上且疗效欠佳的32例肝硬化腹水患者,在原有治疗基础上加用自体BMSC移植治疗,分别于治疗前、治疗后1个月及3个月观察腹围、体重、24 h尿量、血清尿素氮、肌酐、尿钠及血清蛋白浓度等指标变化。采用方差分析、配对t检验和Wilcoxon检验进行统计学分析。结果治疗前,患者体重、腹围、24 h尿量及血清尿素氮、肌酐、血清总蛋白、血清白蛋白及尿钠排出水平分别为(66.9±3.8)kg、(94.0±3.6)cm、(966±138.7)ml、(10.5±3.6)mmol/L、(112.4±30.6)μmol/L、(63.8±4.2)g/L、(32.1±2.7)g/L、(43.8±2.3)mmol/L;治疗后1个月,分别为(66.0±3.9)kg、(93.0±3.6)cm、(1032±154.8)ml、(9.9±3.2)mmol/L、(104.8±25.6)μmol/L、(65.3±3.5)g/L、(32.6±2.9)g/L、(44.7±2.7)mmol/L;治疗后3个月,分别为(56.2±3.7)kg、(80.5±4.5)cm、(1530±180.6)ml、(7.9±2.3)mmol/L、(88.7±22.2)μmol/L、(72.8±3.3)g/L、(39.2±1.5)g/L。3个组别8个指标均数比较有统计学意义(F=78.194、117.689、120.527、6.558、6.712、54.827、83.421、493.776,均P=0.000)。治疗后1个月与治疗前水平差异无统计学意义(t分别为0.587、0.636、0.559、0.556、0.678、0.522、0.611、0.592;P=0.331、0.266、0.101、0.416、0.25、0.107、0.447);而治疗后3个月,患者的体重、腹围较治疗前及治疗后1个月均明显减少,24 h尿量明显增加(与治疗前比较,t=3.722、3.784、3.821,与治疗后1个月比较,t=3.921、3.834、3.944,均P=0.000),血清尿素氮、肌酐水平较治疗前及治疗后1个月均明显下降;而血清总蛋白、白蛋白及尿钠排出水平均明显升高(与治疗前比较,t=2.182、2.338、2.182、2.412、2.136,P尿素、肌酐=0.001,其余P=0.000;与治疗后1个月比较,t=2.392、2.283、2.194、2.331、2.442,均P=0.000),治疗后1个月总有效率为18.75﹪,3个月后治疗总有效率达100﹪,疗效差异有统计学意义(Z=-5.014,P=0.000),无严重并发症发生。结论自体BMSC移植术治疗肝硬化难治性腹水安全有效,且方法简便易行。 Objective To observe the effectiveness and security of hepatic cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites undergoing autologous bone marrow masenchymal stem cells transplantation. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 32 hepatic cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites. These patients had accepted diuretic therapy and supplement of human albumin over three months, but the therapeutic effect is poor. On the base of original treatment, all the patients accepted autologous bone marrow masenchymal stem cells transplantation. We observed respectively the difference of clinical symptoms, weight, and abdominal perimeter, 24 h volume of urine, serum urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, serum total protein,serum albumin and urine sodium at pre-procedure, 1 month and 3 months post-treatment. Analysis of two-way ANOVA, t test and Wilcoxon test were used in the study. Results At baseline, body weight, abdominal perimeter, 24 h volume of urine, serum urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, serum total protein, serum albumin and urin sodium were (66.9 ± 3.8) kg, (94.0 ± 3.6) cm, (966.0 ± 138.7) ml, (10.5± 3.6) mmol/L, (112.4 ±30.6) μmol/L, (63.8 ±4.2) g/L, (32.1 ± 2.7) g/L, and (43.8 ± 2.3) mmol/L, respectively. At 1 month post-transplantation, they were (66.0 ± 3.9) kg, (93.0 ± 3.6) cm, ( 1032 ± 154.8) ml, (9.9 ±3.2) mmol/L, ( 104.8 ± 25.6) μmol/ L, (65.3± 3.5) g/L, (32.6 ± 2.9) g/L, and (44.7 ± 2.7) mmol/L, respectively. At 3 month post-transplantation, they were (56.2 ± 3.7) kg, (80.5 ± 4.5)cm, (1530 ±180.6) ml, (7.9 ±2.3) mmol/L, (88.7 ± 22.2) μmol/L, (72.8 ± 3.3) g/L, and (39.2± 1.5) g/L, respectively. There was significant difference among for all parameters at the three time points (F = 78.194, 117.689, 120.527, 6.558, 6.712, 54.827, 83.421, and 493.776 respectively, P = 0.000 for all). The improvement was no significant between baseline and at 1 month post-transplantation. There was slight improvement in the patients' clinical symptoms, (t = 0.587, 0.636, 0.559, 0.556, 0.678, 0.522, 0.611, and 0.592 respectively; P = 0.331, 0.266, 0.101, 0.416, 0.25, 0.107, and 0.4475 respectively). However, there was significant improvement at 3 months compared to both the base and 1 month post-transplantation (compared to baseline, t = 3.722, 3.784, 3.821, 2.182, 2.338, 2.182, 2.412, and 2.136 respectively, P 〈 0.001 for all; compared to 1 month post- transplantation, t = 3.921, 3.834, 3.944, 2.392, 2.283, 2.194, 2.331, and 2.442 respectively, P = 0.000 for all). The rate of improvement was only 18.75 % at 1 month, but increased to 100 % at 3 months (Z = -5.014, P = 0.000). There was no severe complication. Conclusion Autologous bone marrow masenchymal stem cells transplantation is safe and effective for hepatic cirrhosis patients with refractory ascites.
出处 《中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版)》 2014年第4期6-10,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cell and Stem Cell(Electronic Edition)
关键词 骨髓间充质干细胞 移植 自体 肝硬化 腹水 Bone marrow masenchymal stem cells transplantation,autologous hepatic cirrhosis ascites
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Theise ND, Badve S, Saxena R, et al. Derivation of hepatocytes from bone marrow cells in mice after radiation myeloablation[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 31(1):235-240.
  • 2《中国肝病诊疗管理规范》白皮书(节选)[J].临床肝胆病杂志,2014,30(3):197-209. 被引量:54
  • 3Terai S, Sakaida I. Autologous bone marrow cell infusion therapy for liver cirrhosis patients[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2011,18(1):23-25.
  • 4王震凯,汪芳裕,刘炯,施慧,万海军,陆恒.腹水超滤回输腹腔治疗肝硬化难治性腹水122例临床观察[J].医学研究生学报,2011,24(2):172-174. 被引量:7
  • 5何金秋,潘兴南,王崇国,杨文龙,熊墨龙,涂鸣汉,熊志群,杨玲玲.自体骨髓间充质干细胞移植治疗终末期肝病39例[J].中国组织工程研究与临床康复,2010,14(45):8521-8525. 被引量:24
  • 6欧阳石,刘树人,程涛,陈阳述,孔祥平,周赤龙,穆良静.自体骨髓间充质干细胞肝动脉移植治疗失代偿期肝硬化[J].中国组织工程研究,2013,17(36):6455-6461. 被引量:14
  • 7Malekzadeh R, Mohamadnejad M, Alimoghaddam K, et al. Cell-based regenerative therapy as an alternative to liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease:experience from iran[J]. Int J Organ Transplant Med, 2010, 1(1):21-27.
  • 8Terai S, Sakaida I. Current status of autologous bone marrow cell infusion therapy for liver cirrhosis patients[J]. Hepatol Res, 2008, 38(supplel):s72-75.
  • 9Gordon MY, Levicar N, Pai M, et al. Characterization and clinical application of human CD34+ stem/progenitor cell populations mobilized into the blood by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor[J]. Stern Cells, 2006, 24 (7): 1822-1830.
  • 10Kharaziha P, HellstrOm PM, Noorinayer B, et al. Improvement of liver function in liver cirrhosis patients after autologous mesenchymal stem cell injection: a phase I-II clinical trial[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 21 (10):1199-1205.

二级参考文献38

共引文献96

同被引文献113

  • 1Sviatlana P. Lukashyk,Vladimir M. Tsyrkunov,Yanina I. Isaykina,Oksana N. Romanova,Artur T. Shymanskiy,Olga V. Aleynikova,Rimma I. Kravchuk.Mesenchymal Bone Marrow-derived Stem Cells Transplantation in Patients with HCV Related Liver Cirrhosis[J].Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology,2014,2(4):217-221. 被引量:8
  • 2黄萍,刘丽.甘草酸二铵和丹参联合治疗酒精性肝病[J].中南药学,2005,3(2):121-123. 被引量:10
  • 3Theise ND, Badve S, Saxena R, et al. Derivation of hepatocytes from bone marrow cells in mice after radiation myeloablation[J]. Hepatology, 2000, 31(1):235-240.
  • 4Terai S, Sakaida I. Autologous bone marrow cell infusion therapy for liver cirrhosis patients[J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2011,18(1):23-25.
  • 5Malekzadeh R, Mohamadnejad M, Alimoghaddam K, et al. Cell-based regenerative therapy as an alternative to liver transplantation for end-stage liver disease:experience from iran[J]. Int J Organ Transplant Med, 2010, 1(1):21-27.
  • 6Terai S, Sakaida I. Current status of autologous bone marrow cell infusion therapy for liver cirrhosis patients[J]. Hepatol Res, 2008, 38(supplel):s72-75.
  • 7Gordon MY, Levicar N, Pai M, et al. Characterization and clinical application of human CD34+ stem/progenitor cell populations mobilized into the blood by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor[J]. Stern Cells, 2006, 24 (7): 1822-1830.
  • 8Kharaziha P, HellstrOm PM, Noorinayer B, et al. Improvement of liver function in liver cirrhosis patients after autologous mesenchymal stem cell injection: a phase I-II clinical trial[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2009, 21 (10):1199-1205.
  • 9Takami T, Terai S, Sakaida I. Stem cell therapy in chronic liver disease[J]. Curr Opin Gastroenterol, 2012, 28(3):203-208.
  • 10潘修成,杨帆,陈明,傅涓涓,郭忠胜,张言超,孙莉莉.替比夫定对慢性乙型肝炎患者外周血CD4^+CD25^+调节性T细胞动态变化的影响及其临床意义[J].中华肝脏病杂志,2008,16(12):885-888. 被引量:35

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部