腹腔镜手术治疗输卵管妊娠96例分析

Analysis of 96 Cases of Tubal Pregnancy Treated with Laparoscopic Surgery

本文回顾分析吉林市妇产医院2009年1月至2012年2月确诊输卵管妊娠患者96例,48例(腹腔镜组)行腹腔镜下手术,48例(对照组)行开腹手术。术中及术后情况进行比较分析。腹腔镜组的手术时间、术中失血量低于对照组,比较有统计学差异(P<0.05),腹腔镜组在术后排气时间、离床活动时间、术后住院时间均明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后妊娠率腹腔镜组明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。可见腹腔镜下手术治疗输卵管妊娠比开腹手术具有优越性,是一种理想的手术方式。

Objective TO investigate the curative effect and superiority of laparoscopic surgery treating tubal pregnancy. Method：Retrospectively analyzing 96 cases with tubal pregnancy treated by laparoscopic surgery and open surgery,from January 2009 to February 2012 in Jilin maternity hospital, with 48 cases in each group. To compare the preoperative conditions, postoperative conditions, and postoperative pregnancy conditions. Results：The operating time and bleeding loss volume in the laparoscopic group were lower than that in the open surgery group, and the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05）;the anal exhaust time, time away from bed, and hospital stay in the laparoscopic group were shorter than that in open surgery group, the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Postoperative pregnancy rate of laparoscopic group was higher than the open group（P〈0.05）. Conclusions：Laparoscopic surgery appears better than the traditional open surgery.