期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

《檀香刑》中“凌迟”事件的ECM+分析方案 被引量：2

An ECM+ Analysis on Lingchi Event in Sandalwood Death
原文传递
导出
摘要 事件域认知模型是在批判继承前人理论基础上提出的一种崭新的认知模式,对语言分析具有较强的解释力,但未能涉及要素间的互动关系。本文拟将其与Langacker的识解理论相结合,尝试建立更加完善的ECM+方案,并以此为理论基础,分析莫言小说《檀香刑》中有关"凌迟"事件的语料。该模型为语篇研究提供了一个新的研究思路。 Event-domain Cognitive Model （ECM） is a new one developed from related studies. Based on a review of ECM theory and Construal, the present thesis ventures to combine the two advances, and thus constructs an ECM ＋ theory, which is applied to the analysis on the Lingchi event in Mo Yan＇s Sandalwood Death. And hopefully, this study would provide an added insight for doing applied cognitive linguistics.
作者 毛继光 邓清
机构地区 温州大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期50-53,共4页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 ECM ECM+ 《檀香刑》 ECM ECM ＋ Sandalwood Death
分类号 H0-05 [语言文字—语言学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1莫言.檀香刑[M].北京:当代世界出版社,2003:305,96,318,375,306.
  • 2王寅.事件域认知模型及其解释力[J].现代外语,2005,28(1):17-26. 被引量：145
  • 3Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Ca- tegories Reveal about the Mind[ M ]. Chicago : The Univ- ersity of Chicago Press, 1987.
  • 4Langacker, R, W. Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognit- ive Basis of Grammar[ M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1991/2002.
  • 5Langacker, R, W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar Vol. H: Descriptive Application [ M]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 6Talmy, L. Force Dynamics in Language and Thought [ A ]. In W. Eilfort, P. Kroeber & K. Peterson (eds.). Pap- ers from the Parasession on Causatives and Agentivity [ C]. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 1985.
  • 7Talmy, L. Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition [ J ]. Cognitive Science, 1988 (12).
  • 8Panther, KU. & L. Thornberg. The Potentiality for Actuality Metonymy in English and Hungarian [ A ]. In KU. Pant- her & G. Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought [ C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamin, 1999.
  • 9Schank, R. & R. Abelson. Scripts, Plans, Goals and Unde- rstanding[ M]. Tucker: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates, 1977.

二级参考文献15

  • 1谭达人.略论反义相成词[J].语文研究,1989(1):27-33. 被引量：23
  • 2杨善华.当代两方社会学理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999..
  • 3Cook, G. 1994. Discourse and Literature [M]. OUP.
  • 4Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology [M]. Englewood Cliffs.
  • 5Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things:What Categories Reveal about the Mind[M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 6Langacker, R, W. 1991/2002. Concept, Image and Symbol : The Cognitive Basis of Grammar [M]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 7Langacker, R, W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. Ⅱ. Descriptive Application [ M ]. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
  • 8Panther, KU. & L. Thornburg. 1999. The potentiality for actuality metonymy in English and Hungarian [A]. In Panther, KU. & G.Radden (eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
  • 9Rice, S. 1996. Propositional prototypes[A]. In Putz, M. & R. Dirven (eds.), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought [C].Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10Schank, R. C. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, plans, and knowledge [AI. In Johnson-Laird, P. N. &P. C. Wason (eds.), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science. Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Tbilisi, USSR [C]. CUP.

同被引文献22

  • 1沈家煊.转指和转喻[J].当代语言学,1999,1(1):3-15. 被引量：717
  • 2牛保义.复句语义的主观化研究[J].外国语言研究,2005(4).
  • 3Comrie B. Some Remarks on Ergativity in South Asian Languages [ J ]. South Asian Language Analysis, 1982, (01) : 211 - 219.
  • 4Lyons, J. Semantics [ M ]. Cambridge University Press, 1977:739.
  • 5Langacher. R.W. A Cognitive Grammar A Basic Introduction[ M]. New York:Cambridge University Express, 2008:98.
  • 6Davidse, K. 1992. Transitivity/ergativity: The Janus - headed grammar of actions and events [ C ]//In D. Martin & R. Louise ( eds. ). Advances in Systemic Linguistics. London : Printer Publishers, 1992 : 133.
  • 7Croft w. Typology and Universals (2nd edition) [ M ]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2002:139.
  • 8Dixon,R. M. W. Ergativity[ M]. New York:Cambridge University Press, 1994: 85.
  • 9(英)戴维.克里斯特尔.现代语言学词典[K].北京:商务印书馆,2000:4.
  • 10Benveniste, E. Problems in General Linguistics [ M]. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press, 1958/1971.

引证文献2

外语学刊
2015年 第1期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部