期刊文献+

G20国家创意产业发展影响因素评价与研究 被引量:2

Evaluation and Study on Influencing Factors of G20 Countries' Cultural and Creative Industries
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立衡量人才、技术、宽容、政府政策及基础设施4个因素的指标体系,分析其对G20国家创意产业发展的影响程度。研究结果表明:1 4个因素综合排名前3位的国家是美国、德国、加拿大。其中,人才发展方面,美国、韩国、澳大利亚优势明显;技术方面,韩国、日本、德国得分居高;宽容方面,澳大利亚、加拿大及欧盟位列前3位;政府政策及基础设施方面,德国、日本、美国居于前列。2 4个因素对G20国家创意产业的发展都具有显著正向影响,其中技术和人才因素对创意产业发展影响最大;3 Florida的3T理论具有一定的局限性,忽视了政府政策及基础设施条件对创意产业发展的重要作用。 By building an index system from the aspects of talent, technology, tolerance, government policy and infrastructure, this paper evaluated and analyzed factor characteristics, moreover it also measured the specific influence degree of each comprehensive indicator by ordinary least square method. The results show that: ①America, Germany and Canada own high comprehensive competitiveness scores. In talent scores, America, Korea and Australia have more advantages, while in technology scores, Korea, Japan and Germany have more advantages. Australia, Canada and the European Union own the top three of tolerance scores. In addition, Germany, Japan and America rank the top place in the aspects of the government policy and infrastructure scores. ② All the four com- prehensive indicators positively affect the development of G20 countries' cultural and creative industries; ③ Florida' s 3T theory has some certain limitation in explaining the development of G20 countries' cultural and creative industries. Indeed, in addition to 3T factors, the factor of government policy and infrastructure also plays an important role in the development of G20 countries' cultural and creative industries.
作者 文嫮 徐亚男
出处 《地域研究与开发》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期1-7,共7页 Areal Research and Development
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目(11&ZD012) 湖南省社会科学基金重点项目(12ZDB36)
关键词 创意产业 影响因素 指标体系 G20国家 cultural and creative industries influencing factors index system G20 countries
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Grabber G. The Weakness of Strong Ties:The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhe Area [ C]//Grabher G. The Embedded Finn : On the Socioeeonomics of Indus- trial Networks. London : Routledge, 1993:255 - 277.
  • 2Nonini D M . Is China Becoming Neoliberal? [ J ]. Cri- tique of Anthropology ,2008,28 ( 2 ) : 145 - 176.
  • 3缪晓娟.欧盟文化委员:多元文化与创意有利于增强欧洲社会凝聚力[EB/OL].(2011—11—22)[2013一03—25].http://www.gov.cn/j=(2011—11/22/con-tent_2000216.htm.
  • 4Dutta S, Mia I. The Global Information Technology Re- port 2008-2009 [ M ]. Geneva : SRO-Kundig, 2009 : 71 - 89.
  • 5Glaeser E L. Review of Richard Florida' s The Rise of the Creative Class[ J ]. Regional Science and Urban Econom- ics,2005,35 (5) :593 - 596.
  • 6Coe N, Johns J. Beyond Production Clusters, Toward a Critical Political Economy of Networks in the Film and Television Industries [ C ]//Power D, Scott A J. The Cul- tural Industries and the Production of Culture. London: Roufledge ,2004 : 188 - 204.
  • 7Kacerauskas T. Creative Economy and Technologies:So- cial,Legal and Communicative Issues[J]. Journal of Bus- iness Economics and Management,2012,13( 1 ) :71 -80.
  • 8Florida R. The Rise of the Creative Class:and How It' s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life [ M ]. New York : Basic Books, 2002 : 24 - 37.
  • 9杨令侠.加拿大多元文化主义[N].中国社会科学报,2010一02-04(07).
  • 10Wenting R, Atzema O, Frenken K. Urban Amenities and Agglomeration Economies? The Loeational Behaviour and Economic Success of Dutch Fashion Design Entre- preneurs[ J]. Urban Studies ,2011,48(7) : 1333 - 1352.

二级参考文献31

共引文献124

同被引文献32

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部