期刊文献+

股份公司股东权利多元化配置的域外借鉴与制度建构 被引量:22

Plural Allocation of Stockholders' Rights in Joint-Stock Corporation: Draw on Extraterritorial Experiences for Legislation of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 与中国股份公司单一股份类型不同,域外股份公司(公众公司)在股份类型上样态丰富。这种多元化股东权利配置模式具有坚实的理论基础。从立法上看,域外的相关规范表述不尽相同,但从内在机理上说,其实现机制都是通过多种形式的权利或利益交换。交换的效果将通过股东权利结构的统一或分离、权利行使的优先或劣后、权利计量的放大或限缩、权利内容的增加或减少加以体现。中国股份公司对于股东权利多元化配置有着紧迫的制度需求,公司立法应当修改妨碍股东权利多元化配置的强行性规范,引入类别权利等核心概念,并通过多层次立法为股份公司直接进行股东权利多元化配置提供规范路径。 Extraterritorial public corporations have abundant stocks types, which are different from single stocks' type in joint-stock corporations of China. In legislations, articles of different corporate acts are various, but their mechanisms to realize plural allocation of stockholders' rights are all by means of multiple rights or benefits exchange. Its effects will take the forms of unified or separated rights structure, preferred of inferior rights exercise, enlarged or narrowed rights calculation and added or reduced rights content. It is urgent to introduce plural allocation of stockholders' rights into joint-stock corporations of China. Corporation law of China should modifies mandatory rules which hinder plural allocation of stockholders' rights and bring in such as class rights and provide normative path for plural allocation of stockholders' rights in joint-stock corporations by multilevel legislations.
作者 汪青松
出处 《比较法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期48-60,共13页 Journal of Comparative Law
基金 作者承担的国家社科基金项目"经营者集中的附条件批准制度研究"(12CFX068) 教育部人文社科规划基金项目"股份公司股东权利配置的多元模式研究"(12YJA820068) 2012年西南政法大学资助项目的阶段性成果
关键词 股份公司 股东权利 类别股份 类别权利 joint-stock corporation stockholders' rights classified stocks class rights
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Caspar Rose, A Critical Analysis of the ‘ One Share-one Vote ’ Controversy, 5 International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 126, 126(2008).
  • 2王轶.民法价值判断问题的实体性论证规则——以中国民法学的学术实践为背景[J].中国社会科学,2004(6):104-116. 被引量:386
  • 3汪青松,赵万一.股份公司内部权力配置的结构性变革——以股东“同质化”假定到“异质化”现实的演进为视角[J].现代法学,2011,33(3):32-42. 被引量:97
  • 4Shaun Martin & Frank Partnoy, Encumbered Shares,2005 University of Illinois Law Review 775,778 -781.
  • 5George W. Dent, Jr.,The Essential Unity of Shareholders and the Myth of Investor Short-Termism, 35 Delaware Journal of Corporate Law97,100-101 (2010).
  • 6Leo E. Strine, Jr.,Toward a True Corporate Republic : A Traditionalist Response to Bebchuks Solution for Improving Corporate America,119 Harvard Law Review 1759, 1765 (2006).
  • 7Shearman & Sterling LLP, Proportionality between Ownership and Control in EU Listed Companies: Comparative Legal Studyt ExternalStudy Commissioned by the European Commission, 2007, at 12.
  • 8David I. Walker, Evolving Executive Equity Compensation and the Limits of Optimal Contracting, 64 Vanderbilt L. Rev. 611, 611 - 674(2011).
  • 9James H. Irving, Wayne R. Landsman & Bradley P. Lindsey, The Valuation Differences between Stock Option and Restricted Stock Grantsfor US Firms, 38 Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 395,395 -412 (2011).
  • 10Martin & Partnoy, supra note 5 , at 778 -780.

二级参考文献56

同被引文献216

引证文献22

二级引证文献58

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部