摘要
目的:观察急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(p PCI)前后心室肌跨壁复极离散度指标(QTc、Tp-Te、Tp-Tec间期)的差异。方法:回顾分析245例STEMI患者,其中行p PCI治疗(干预组)188例,未行p PCI(对照组)57例,采集其入院即刻及入院第3天标准12导联心电图进行分析。结果:(1)干预组患者入院第3天和入院即刻比较,QTc间期无明显变化(P=0.277),Tp-Te间期、Tp-Tec间期均明显减小(P<0.001);对照组患者入院第3天和入院即刻比较,QTc间期较前增大,Tp-Te间期、Tp-Tec间期均较前减小(P分别为:0.018,0.003,0.001);与对照组比较,干预组入院第3天Tp-Te、Tp-Tec间期减小更明显。(2)干预组与对照组相比,住院期间恶性心律失常事件发生率降低(P<0.05)。结论:急诊PCI术可使Tp-Te间期、Tp-Tec间期明显减小,比药物治疗可更有效地改善心室肌跨壁复极离散度,使恶性心律失常发生率降低。
Objective: To observe the effects of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) on transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR). Methods: A retrospective analysis on 245 cases with acute STEMI. All of the patients were divided into two groups: 188 cases undergoing pPCI treatment as the intervention group, and 57 cases without pPCI treatment as the control group. Corrected QT interval (QTc) and T-wave peak to end interval before and after correcting heart rate (Tp-Te, Tp-Tee) were measured on admission and on the third day after admission. Results: ( 1 )Intervention group: QTe interval on the third day had no statistical significance compared with that on admission (P=0.277), while the Tp-Te, Tp-Tec intervals were both significantly decreased (P〈0.001). Control group: QTc interval was longer on the third day and Tp-Te, Tp-Tec intervals were both significantly decreased (P〈0.05), as compared to the intervention group;(2 )Comparing with the control group, the intervention group had a lower incidence of malignant arrhythmia (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Primary PCI could make Tp-Te, Tp-Tec intervals decrease significantly, thus improving TDR and reducing the incidence of malignant arrhythmia as compared to absolute medicine therapy.
出处
《天津医科大学学报》
2015年第1期48-50,共3页
Journal of Tianjin Medical University
关键词
急性心肌梗死
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
T波峰末间期
acute myocardial infarction
percutaneous coronary intervention
T-wave peak to end interval