期刊文献+

经皮椎间孔镜与开放减压手术治疗老年腰椎椎管狭窄症疗效对比 被引量:39

Outcomes of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for elder patients with lumbar spinal stenosis syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价经皮椎间孔镜下髓核摘除术(percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy,PTED)和传统后路椎体间融合术(posterior interbody fusion,PLIF)治疗老年性腰椎椎管狭窄症的临床疗效。方法回顾分析76例获完整随访的老年性腰椎椎管狭窄症患者的治疗情况。根据手术方法患者分为2组,A组41例行传统开放减压、PLIF,B组35例行PTED。记录2组患者围手术期观察指标、手术切口视觉模拟量表(vicual aneligue scale,VAS)评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评价患者日常生活能力。结果与A组相比,B组手术时间、卧床时间、X线照射时间、出血量等指标显著降低(P<0.01)。随访结果显示2组患者术后24个月较术后1个月ODI明显改善,B组改善优于A组(P<0.05)。结论 PTED在术中切口、出血量、术后恢复等方面具有优越性,是一种有效的治疗腰椎椎管狭窄的术式。 Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of lumbar percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) and traditional open decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for elder patients with lumbar spi- nal stenosis syndrome. Methods From January 2009 to December 2011, 76 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated by PTED or PLIF and followed up for over 24 months were analyzed retrospectively. In Group A, 41 patients were treated with traditional open decompression PL1F, while 35 cases underwent PTED in Group B. The operative time, X-ray exposure time, bed time, postoperative ambulation, operative incision visual analogue scale (VAS) and blood loss were measured for both groups. Oswestry disability index (ODI) was evaluated at 1 and 24 months after treatment for detection on daily living activity. Results Compared with Group A, Group B had shorter operation time, X-ray exposure time, bed time (P 〈 0.01 ). The average blood loss, analgesic drug usage cases of Group B were better than those of Group A (P 〈0.05). The improvement of incision VAS of Group B was better than that of Group A ( P 〈 0.05 ). The ODI at postoperative 1 and 94 month were better than that before operation for both groups, but the Group B had more improvement ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusion PTED has advantages in incision, blood loss and postoperative recovery. It is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment for lumbar canal stenosis.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2014年第5期293-297,共5页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎管狭窄 减压术 外科 脊柱融合术 外科手术 微创性 Lumbar vertebrae Spinal stenosis Decompression, surgical Spinal fusion Surgical procedures, minimallyinvasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Park SC,Yoon SH,Hong YP,et al.Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous u(coflex)[J].J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2009,46(4):292-299.
  • 2Hey HW,Hee HT.Lumbar degenerative spinal deformity:Surgical options of PLIF,TLIF and MI-TLIF[J].Indian J Orthop,2010,44(2):159-162.
  • 3Ahsan MK,Hossain MA,Sakeb N,et al.Instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) with interbody fusion device(Cage) in degenerative disc disease(DDD):3 years outcome[J].Mymensingh Med J,2013,22(4):798-806.
  • 4Fairbank JC.Use and abuse of Oswestry Disability Index[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2007,32(25):2787-2789.
  • 5Huskisson EC.Measurement of pain[J].Lancet,1974,2(7889):1127-1131.
  • 6肖波,毛克亚,王岩,肖嵩华,张永刚,张西峰,张雪松,王征,崔庚,陆宁,朱守荣,薛超.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与传统后路腰椎椎体间融合术并发症的比较分析[J].脊柱外科杂志,2013,11(1):23-27. 被引量:69
  • 7杨晋才,海涌,藏磊,关立,苏庆军,周立金,单磊,于亮,刘玉增.加压植骨联合单枚Cage的椎体间融合与后外侧融合治疗双节段腰椎椎管狭窄症临床效果的回顾性研究[J].脊柱外科杂志,2011,9(4):216-219. 被引量:4
  • 8Chen BL,Wei FX,Ueyama K,et al.Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF:the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(11):1946-1950.
  • 9Kim MJ,Lee SH,Jung ES,et al.Targeted percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic diskectomy in 295 patients:comparison with results of microscopic diskectomy[J].Surg Neurol,2007,68(6):623-631.
  • 10刘宝平,何强,范先东,白一冰.PTED治疗腰椎间盘突出症的前瞻性分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2011,26(7):614-615. 被引量:27

二级参考文献23

  • 1李危石,陈仲强,郭昭庆,齐强,刘忠军.椎间植骨融合与横突间植骨融合治疗腰椎滑脱症的比较[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2005,15(1):20-23. 被引量:113
  • 2Madan S,Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2002,27(14):1536-1542.
  • 3Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al.Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1997,22(2):210-219.
  • 4WATKINS MB.Posterolateral fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine[J].J Bone Joint Surg Am,1953,35-A(4):1014-1018.
  • 5Sears W.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis:restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers[J].Spine J,2005,5(2):170-179.
  • 6Wang ST,Goel VK,Kubo S,et al.Comparison of stabilities between obliquely and conventionally inserted Bagby and Kuslich cages as posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaver model[J].J Chin Med Assoc,2003,66(11):676-681.
  • 7Yan DL, Pei FX, Li J, et al. Comparative study of PILF and TLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis. Eurspine J, 2008, 17(10): 1311-1316.
  • 8MacNab I. Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve root involvement in sixty-eight patients. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1971,53 : 891-903.
  • 9Peng B,Wu W,Li Z, et al. Chemical radiculitis pain,2007,127: 11-16.
  • 10王旭,刘寿坤,袁翠华,温保军.射频消融髓核成形术治疗颈椎间盘突出症[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(10):853-854. 被引量:7

共引文献97

同被引文献300

引证文献39

二级引证文献240

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部