期刊文献+

Supreme与Flexible喉罩通气罩内压对气道漏气压的影响 被引量:5

Impact of Cuff Pressure on Airway Leak Pressure in Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Flexible
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Supreme喉罩和Flexible喉罩不同通气罩内压对气道漏气压的影响。方法择期全麻乳腺手术患者,根据插入喉罩种类不同分为Supreme组(35例)和Flexible组(33例)。常规静脉麻醉诱导后由同一麻醉科医师插入Supreme或Flexible喉罩,确认位置良好,调整通气罩压力。分别记录通气罩压力为10、20、30、40、50 cm H2O(1 cm H2O=0.098 k Pa)时,两种喉罩的气道漏气压值。结果 Supreme组通气罩内压力20、30、40、50 cm H2O时,所对应的气道漏气压差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但均显著高于10 cm H2O时气道漏气压(P<0.05);Flexible组通气罩内压力为30、40、50 cm H2O时,所对应的气道漏气压差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但高于10、20 cm H2O时气道漏气压(P<0.05)。Supreme组患者的整体平均气道漏气压(25.40±5.52)cm H2O明显高于Flexible组的(20.67±3.06)cm H2O(P<0.05)。结论 Supreme喉罩的平均气道漏气压高于Flexible喉罩,达到最大平均气道漏气压时,Supreme喉罩所需的通气罩内压(20 cm H2O)低于Flexible喉罩(30 cm H2O)。 Objective To investigate the impact of cuff pressure on airway leak pressure in laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Supreme and Flexible.Methods Patients about to have elective breast surgery were divided into Supreme group (35 cases) and Flexible group (33 cases).After general induction of anesthesia,LMA Supreme or Flexible was inserted by one anesthesiologist.We confirmed the LMA location,adjusted the cuff pressure,and recorded the peak airway leak pressures under different cuff pressures (10,20,30,40,and 50 cmH2O).Results In Supreme group,peak airway leak pressures [(24.46 ± 5.43),(25.11 ± 5.51),(25.86 ±5.57),(26.17 ±5.72) cmH2O] under 20,30,40,and 50 cmH2O cuff pressure showed no significant difference (P 〉0.05) between each other,but significantly higher than that under 10 cmH2O cuff pressure (20.80 ± 4.63) cmH2O (P 〈 0.05).And in the Flexible group,peak airway leak pressures [(20.09±2.98),(20.70±3.08),(21.21 ±3.15) cmH2O] under30,40,50 cmH2O cuff pressure also showed no significant difference (P 〉 0.05) between each other,but significantly higher than those under 10 or 20 cmH2O cuff pressure [(17.52 ± 2.39),(18.61 ± 2.42) cmH2O].Mean peak airway leak pressure [(25.40 ± 5.52) cmH2O] of LMA Supreme was significantly higher than that of LMA Flexible (20.67 ± 3.06) cmH2O (P 〈 0.05).Conclusions Mean airway leak pressure of LMA Supreme is higher than LMA Flexible.The lowest cuff pressure to meet the tightness requirement with LMA Supreme is 20 cmH2O,which is lower than Flexible (30 cmH2O).
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期620-623,共4页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词 喉罩 Supreme FLEXIBLE 通气罩内压 laryngeal mask airway Supreme Flexible cuff pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Biebuyck JF,Pennant JH,White PF.The laryngeal mask airway its uses in anesthesiology[J].Anesthesiology,1993,79 (1):144-163.
  • 2Sise MJ,Shackford SR,Sise CB,et al.Early intubation in the management of trauma patients:indications and outcomes in 1000 patients[J].J Trauma,2009,66 (1):32-39.
  • 3Jeon YS,Choi JW,Jung HS,et al.Effect of continuous cuff pressure regulator in general anaesthesia with laryngeal mask airway[J].J Int Med Res,2011,39 (5):1900-1907.
  • 4申乐,虞雪融,何凯,陈雯,易杰,黄宇光.ProSeal、Supreme与i-gel等3种双管喉罩的临床应用比较[J].基础医学与临床,2013,33(5):605-608. 被引量:11
  • 5Brimacombe J,Holyoake L,Keller C,et al.Pharyngolaryngeal:neck,and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low Cmft volumes in males and females[J].Anesthesiology,2000,93 (1):26-31.
  • 6Wong JG,Heaney M,Chambers NA,et al.Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children[J].Pediatric Anesthesia,2009,19 (5):464-469.
  • 7Lee A,Tey J,Lim Y,et al.Comparison of the single-use LMA Supreme with the reusable ProSeal LMA for anaesthesia in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery[J].Anaesth Intensive Care,2009,37 (5):815-819.
  • 8Brimacombe J,Keller C,Judd DV.Gum elastic Bongieguided insetfion of the ProSeal (TM) laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques[J].Anesthesiology,2004,100 (1):25-29.
  • 9Brimacombe J,Keller C.Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways[J].Can J Anaesth,1999,46 (6):558-563.
  • 10Russo SG,Cremer S,Galli T,et al.Randomized comparison of the i-gel (TM),the LMA Supreme (TM),and the Laryngeal Tube Suction-D using clinical and fibreoptic assessments in elective patients[J].BMC Anesthesiol,2012,12 (1):18.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Campo SL, Denman WT. The laryngeal mask airway: its role in the difiqcult airway [ J ]. Int Anesthesiol Clin, 2000, 38:29-45.
  • 2Cook TM, Lee G, Nolan JP. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: a review of the literature [ J ]. Can J Anaesth, 2005, 52 : 739 - 760.
  • 3Verghese C, Ramaswamy B. LMA-Supreme a new sin- gle-use LMA with gastric aecess: a report on its clinical ef- ficacy [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2008, 101:405-410.
  • 4Beylaeq L, Bordes M, Semjen F, et al. The 1-gel, a sin- gle-use supraglottie airway device with a non-inflatable cuff and an esophageal vent: an observational study in children [J]. Aeta Anaesthesiol Seand, 2009, 53:376-379.
  • 5Teoh WH, Lee KM, Suhitharan T, et al. Comparison of the LMA Supreme vs the i-gel in paraiysed patients undergoing gynaecologieal laparoseopie surgery with controlled ventila- tion [J]. Anaesthesia, 2010, 65: 1173- 1179.
  • 6Ruetzler K, Roessler B, Potura L, et al. Performance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven dif- ferent airway devices a manikin study [ J ]. Resuscita- tion, 2011, 82:593-597.
  • 7Fischer H, Hochbrugger E, Fast A, et al. Performance of supraglottic airway devices and 12 month skill retention: a randomized controlled study with manikins [ J ]. Resuscita- tion, 2011, 82:326-331.
  • 8Wong DT, Yang J J, Jagannathan N. Brief review: The LMA SupremeTM supraglottic airway [ J]. Can J Anaesth, 2012, 59:483-493.
  • 9Gasteiger L, Brimacombe J, Oswald E, et al. LMA ProSeal (TM) vs. i-gel ( TM ) in ventilated children : a random- ised, crossover study using the size 2 mask [J]. Acta An- aesthesiol Scand, 2012, 56:1321 -1324.
  • 10Theiler L, Gutzmann M, Kleine-Brueggeney M, et al. i- geiTM supraglottic airway in clinical practice: a prospective observational multicentre study [J]. Br J Anaesth, 2012, 109 : 990 - 995.

共引文献10

同被引文献29

  • 1Sise MJ,Shackford SR,Sise CB,et al. Early intubation in the management of trauma patients:indications and outcomes in 1000 patients [J]. J Trauma,2009,66(1):32-39.
  • 2Brimacombe J,Holyoake L,Keller C,et al. Pharyngolaryngeal,neck,and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mask and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females [J]. Anesthesiology,2000,93(1):26-31.
  • 3Suhitharan T,Seevanayagam S,Parker FC,et al. Acute unilateral submandibular gland swelling associated with the laryngeal mask airway [J]. Singapore Med J,2013,54(12):e236-e239.
  • 4Wong JG,Heaney M,Chambers NA,et al. Impact of laryngeal mask airway cuff pressures on the incidence of sore throat in children [J]. Paediatr Anaesth,2009,19(5):464-469.
  • 5Chantzara G,Stroumpoulis K,Alexandrou N,et al. Influence of LMA cuff pressure on the incidence of pharyngolaryngeal adverse effects and evaluation of the use of manometry during different ventilation modes:a randomized clinical trial [J]. Minerva Anestesiol,2014,80(5):547-555.
  • 6Kang JE,Oh CS,Choi JW,et al. Postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events with laryngeal mask airway(LMA Supreme)in laparoscopic surgical procedures with cuff pressure limiting 25 cmH2O:prospective,blind,and randomised study [J/OL]. Sci World J,2014,2014:709801. [2014-05-01]. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/tswj/2014/709801/.
  • 7von Ungern-Sternberg BS,Erb TO,Chambers NA,et al. Laryngeal mask airways-to inflate or to deflate after insertion[J]. Paediatr Anaesth,2009,19(9):837-843.
  • 8Marjot R. Pressure exerted by the laryngeal mask airway cuff upon the pharyngeal mucosa [J]. Br J Anaesth,1993,70(1):25-29.
  • 9Zhang J,Zhao Z,Chen Y,et al. New insights into the mechanism of injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve associated with the laryngeal mask airway [J]. Med Sci Monit,2010,16(5):HY7-HY9.
  • 10Licina A,Chambers NA,Hullett B,et al. Lower cuff pressures improve the seal of pediatric laryngeal mask airways [J]. Paediatr Anaesth,2008,18(10):952-956.

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部