期刊文献+

肾动脉交感神经消融术治疗顽固性高血压有效性的Meta分析

Effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价肾动脉交感神经消融术治疗顽固性高血压的有效性和安全性。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI),纳入肾动脉交感神经消融术与药物治疗顽固性高血压有效性及安全性的随机对照研究和队列研究。由两名评价员按照纳入与排除标准筛选文献,提取资料和评价质量后,采用Cochrane协作网提供的Rev Man 5.3统计软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入7篇文献,包括3篇随机对照研究(共668例患者),4篇队列研究(共259例患者)。随机对照研究Meta分析结果显示:术后6个月肾动脉交感神经消融术组(RDN组)与对照组收缩压下降差异无统计学意义(WMD-18.85 mm Hg,95%CI-37.89~0.19,P=0.05)(1 mm Hg=0.133 k Pa),但RDN组舒张压下降显著高于对照组(WMD-7.08 mm Hg,95%CI-13.25^-0.90,P=0.02)。队列研究Meta分析结果显示:术后6个月RDN组收缩压和舒张压下降显著高于对照组(WMD-25.14 mm Hg,95%CI-30.50^-19.77,P<0.00001;WMD-6.13 mm Hg,95%CI-6.85^-5.42,P<0.00001)。手术并发症包括2例死亡、2例股动脉假性动脉瘤、1例肾动脉夹层。结论肾动脉交感神经消融术可显著降低顽固性高血压患者舒张压,但对降低收缩压疗效不明确。肾动脉交感神经消融术不良事件发生率较低,具有良好的安全性。高质量大规模多中心研究及术后长期随访是未来研究的重点。 Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of renal denervation and medication therapy for resistant hypertension. Methods Databases including Pub Med,EMbase,MEDLINE,the Cochrane Library,CMB and CNKI were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials( RCTs) and cohort study trials( CSTs) about the effectiveness and safety of renal denervation and medication therapy for resistant hypertension. The literature was screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria by two reviewers independently. The quality was evaluated. The data were extracted and meta-analyses were performed by using Rev Man 5. 3 software. Results Seven trials were included,of which 3 were RCTs involving 668 patients,and 4 were cohort study trials involving 259 patients. Among the RCTs,there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure( BP) at 6 months of( WMD- 18. 85 mm Hg,95%CI- 37. 89-0. 19,P = 0. 05) and( WMD- 7. 08 mm Hg,95% CI- 13. 25-- 0. 90, P = 0. 02)respectively,compared with the control. Among the CSTs,there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure( BP) at 6 months of( WMD- 25. 14 mm Hg,95% CI- 30. 50-- 19. 77,P 〈0. 00001) and( WMD- 6. 13 mm Hg,95% CI- 6. 85-- 5. 42,P 〈 0. 00001) respectively,compared with the control. Reported procedural complications included 2 death,one renal artery dissection and 2 femoral pseudo aneurysms. Conclusions The therapy of RDN can significantly reduce the diastolic blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension,but the lowering systolic blood pressure effect is not obvious. With few adverse events reported,RDN has favorable safety. High quality large multicenter studies and long-term follow-up after surgery is the focus of future research.
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2014年第12期774-780,共7页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
关键词 肾动脉交感神经消融术 顽固性高血压 META分析 Renal denervation Resistant hypertension Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Sarafidis P A, Georgianos P, Bakris GL. Resistant hypertensionitsidentification and epidemiology. Nat Rev Nephrol,2013,9 :51- 58.
  • 2Kumbhani DJ, Steg PG, Cannon CP, et al. Resistant hypertension: a frequent and ominous finding among hypertensive patients with atherothrombosis. Eur HeartJ, 2013 , 34: 1204- 1214.
  • 3Smith SM, Gong Y, Handberg E, et al. Predictors and outcomes of resistant hypertension among patients with coronary artery disease and hypertension.J Hypertens ,2014,32 : 635.Q43 .
  • 4Calhoun DA,Jones D, Textor S, et al. Resistant hypertension: diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment-a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Professional Education Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension, 2008,51: 1403-1419.
  • 5孙宁玲,霍勇,王继光,李南方,陶军,李勇,严晓伟,蒋雄京,李学旺.难治性高血压诊断治疗中国专家共识[J].中国介入心脏病学杂志,2013,21(2):69-74. 被引量:58
  • 6卢成志.2013欧洲心脏病学会肾动脉交感神经消融术专家共识解读[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(8):72-75. 被引量:2
  • 7Hering D, Lambert EA, Marusic P , et al. Substantial reduction in single sympathetic nerve firing after renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension. Hypertension,2013, 61 :457464.
  • 8Krum H, Schlaich M, Whitbourn R, et al. Catheter-basedrenal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study. Lancet, 2009,373: 1275-1281.
  • 9Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Corbucci G, et al. A randomized comparison of pulmonary vein isolation with versus without concomitant renal artery denervation in patients with refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation and resistant hypertension.J Am Coli Cardiol, 2012,60: 1163-1170.
  • 10Ahmed H, Neuzil P, SkodaJ, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation using an irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter for the management of drug-resistant hypertension.JACC Cardiovasc Interv ,2012,5: 758-765.

二级参考文献45

  • 1Jadad AR. Randomised controlled trials, A user's guide.[2007-01-26]http://www.cgmh.org.tw/intr/intr5/c6700/OBGYN/F/Randomized%20tial/chapter I .html.
  • 2Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, et al. Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med, 1983, 309:1359-1361.
  • 3Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias:dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA, 1995, 273: 408-412.
  • 4Schulz KF. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA,1995, 274: 1456-1458.
  • 5Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrebjartsson A, et al. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. BM./, 2005, 330: 1049.
  • 6Moher D, Fortin P, Jadad AR, et al. Completeness of reporting of trials published in languages other than English: implications for conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. Lancet, 1996, 347:363-366.
  • 7Calhoun DA,Jones D, Textor S, et al. Resistant hypertension:diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment. A scientific statement fromthe American Heart Association Professional Education Committeeof the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension,2008, 51:1403-1419.
  • 8Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Joint NationalCommittee on Prevention,Detection,Evaluation, and Treatmentof High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and BloodInstitute; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; NationalHigh Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee.Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention,detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.Hypertension, 2003,42 : 1206-1252.
  • 9Dahlof B,Sever PS, Poulter NR, et al. ASCOT Investigators.Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensiveregimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versusatenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the AngloScandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure LoweringArm ( ASCOT-BPLA) : a multicentre randomised controlled trial.Lancet,2005,366 : 895 -906.
  • 10Jamerson K,Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. ACCOMPLISH TrialInvestigators. Benazepril plus amlodipine or hydrochlorothiazidefor hypertension in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med,2008,359:2417-2428.

共引文献231

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部