期刊文献+

组织公平感、心理契约态势与员工技术创造力的相关性研究——基于高科技中小风险企业的数据检验 被引量:3

The Correlation Research among Organization Justice,Psychological Contract and Technical Creativity——Based on the data validation of high-tech small and medium risk enterprise
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公平性组织文化对知识型员工心理契约存在着天然的优化作用,进而促进员工个人创造力的成长。基于高科技中小风险企业的样本数据,借助于结构方程模型,经验性的研究揭示了员工组织公平感、心理契约态度和技术创造力之间的内在关系,发现动机公平、过程公平和分配公平对交易型心理契约存在着优化功能,而仅有过程公平对关系型心理契约存在着优化功能。同时,交易型心理契约对员工创造力的成长存在着直接的驱动作用,而关系型心理契约则缺乏这种驱动功能。样本检验为高科技中小风险企业员工创造力的培育提供了现实性的策略指导和理论借鉴。 The fairness organization culture has a natural incentive role in the psychological contract of knowledge workers, thus contributing to the growth of employee personal creativity. Based on the sample data of high - tech small and medium risk enterprise and by means of structural equation modeling, empirical studies reveal the intrinsic relationship among organization fairness sense, psychological contract attitudes and techniques creativity, and finds that motivation fair, process fair and distribution fair have a optimization role for transactional psychological contract, while only process fair has a optimization role for relational psychological contract, and that transactional contract has a direct driven effect on the growth of employee creativity, while the relational psychological contract has no role on it. Sample test provides a realistic strategic guidance and theory reference for high - tech small and medium risk enterprises to torture employees cultivate creativity.
出处 《中国劳动关系学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期82-87,共6页 Journal of China University of Labor Relations
基金 国家自然科学基金"基于产品全生命周期的企业低碳制造战略形成机制与驱动模式研究"(项目编号:71273118)研究成果
关键词 组织公平 心理契约 技术创造力 结构方程模型 organizational justice psychological contract technical creativity structural equation modeling
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Colquitt, J. A. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86: 386-400.
  • 2张道海,张同建.基于平衡计分卡的高科技中小风险企业绩效评价体系研究[J].财会通讯(中),2010(12):19-20. 被引量:3
  • 3Thibaut J and Walker L procedural Justice: A psychological a- nalysis. Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum, 1975.
  • 4Argyris C. Understanding Organizational Behavior. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press, 1960.
  • 5Colquitt, J, A., Conlon, D, E., Wesson, M, J., Porter, C. o. &Ng, K. Justice at the millennium: A meta - analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychol- ogy, 2001, 86:425-445.
  • 6Luc SELS, Maddy Janssens and lng Van Den Brande, Assessing the nature of psychological contracts: a validation of six dimen- sions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2004 (25) : 461 - 488.
  • 7Rousseau D M. Psychological and implied contracts in organiza- tions. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 1989, 2 : 121 139.
  • 8Leventhal G S, Karuza J, and Fry W R. Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. Ingmikula ( ED), Justice and Social Inter - action, NY : Spring - Verlag, 1980 : 27 - 55.
  • 9Bies R J, Moag J F. Interactional justice: Communication crite- ria of fairness. Research on negotiations in organizations ( Vol. 1 ). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1986:43-55.
  • 10David C. Thomas, Kevin AU and Blizabeth C. Ravlin. Cuhural variation and the psychological contract. Journal of Organizational Be- havior, 2003 (24): 451- 471.

二级参考文献52

共引文献16

同被引文献24

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部