摘要
目的探讨灭活双歧杆菌或双歧杆菌培养上清对脂多糖(LPS)刺激的大鼠肠上皮细胞株(IEC-6)肿瘤坏死因子受体相关因子6(TRAF6)、糖原合成激酶±3β(GSK-3β)和miRNA-146a mRNA表达的影响。方法取对数生长期的IEC-6采用随机数字表法分为LPS组、培养上清组和灭活菌组。3组细胞均用5mg/L的LPS刺激细胞5h后,分别做下列处理:LPS组培养液中加入1mL无菌9g/L盐水继续培养24h;培养上清组培养液中加入婴儿双歧杆菌培养上清1mL继续培养24h;灭活菌组培养液中加入1mL1×1010 CFU/L灭活婴儿双歧杆菌继续培养24h。反转录(RT)-PCR法检测各组细胞中TRAF6、GsK-3β及miRNA-146a mRNA的表达。结果培养上清组细胞TRAF-6(0.724±0.05)、GSK-3β(0.464±0.14)的mRNA相对表达量均低于LPS组(1.014±0.14,1.024±0.25),miRNA-146a的mRNA相对表达量(3.05±0.40)高于LPS组(1.01±0.12),差异均有统计学意义(t=5.278、6.316、13.218,P=0.000);灭活菌组细胞GSK±3β的mRNA相对表达量(0.59±0.13)低于LPS组,差异有统计学意义(t=4.837,P=0.000),而TRAF-6、miRNA-146a的mRNA相对表达量(1.05±0.11,0.78±0.22)与LPS组比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.732、1.463,P〉0.05)。培养上清组细胞TRAF6的mRNA相对表达量低于灭活菌组,miRNA-146a的mRNA相表达量高于灭活菌组,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.009、14.687,P=0.000)。结论双歧杆菌培养上清和灭活菌对LPS刺激的IEC-6均有一定的保护作用;双歧杆菌培养上清的保护作用机制之一可能是通过升高miRNA-146a,降低炎症相关因子TRAF6和损伤因子GSK-3β水平实现的;灭活双歧杆菌的保护作用可能是通过降低损伤因子GSK-3β水平实现的。
Objective To detect the effects of bifidobacterium or bifidobacterium cultured supernatant on the mRNA expression of tumor necrosis factor receptor - associated factor 6 ( TRAF6 ), glycogen synthase kinase - 3β (GSK-3β) and the miRNA- 146a in rat small intestinal epithelial cell( IEC -6) induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Methods IEC - 6 in logarithmic phase were randomly divided into LPS group, cultured supernatant group and inactivated bacteria group. All the 3 groups were exposed to 5 mg/L LPS for 5 hours, and then 1 mL sterile saline was added in LPS group and culturing continued for 24 hours ; 1 mL bifidobacterium cultured supematant was added in cul- tured supematant group and culturing continued for 24 hours;1 mL inactivated bifidobacterium 1 ± 1010CFU/L added in inactivated bacteria group and continued culturing for 24 hours. The mRNA expressions of TRAF6, GSK - 3β and miRNA - 146a were detected by reverse transcription - polymerase chain reaction ( RT - PCR). Results The level of TRAF6,GSK -3β of culture supematant group(0.72 ±0.05,0.46 ±0. 14) were all lower than LPS group( 1. 01 ± 0. 14,1.02± 0.25 ), but the level of miRNA- 146a( 3.05 ± 0.40) was higher than that in LPS group (1.01 ± 0.12 ), and there were significant differences between them ( t = 5. 278,6.316,13. 218, P = 0.000). The level of GSK - 3β of inactivated bacteria group (0.59 ± 0.13 ) was significantly lower than that in LPS group ( t = 4. 837, P = 0. 000 ). The levels of TRAF6 and miRNA - 146a of inactivated bacteria group( 1.05 ±0.11,0.78 ±0.22) had no significant diffe- rences with LPS group ( t = O. 732,1. 463, P 〉 0.05 ). The level of TRAF6 of cultured snpernatant group was lower than that in inactivated bacteria group, and the level of miRNA - 146a was higher than that in inactivated bacteria group, and there were significant differences between 2 groups ( t = 6. 009,14. 687, P = 0. 000 ). Conclusions Bifidobacterium cultured supematant and inactivated bacteria both have certain protective effect on the IEC -6 induced by LPS. One of the protective mechanisms of bifidobaeterium cultured supernatant may be achieved by elevating the expression ofmiRNA - 146a, and decreasing the levels of inflammation related factor TRAF6 and damage related factor GSK - 3β. The protective effects of inactivated bifidobacterium may be achieved by decreasing the level of damage related factor GSK - 3β.
出处
《中华实用儿科临床杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第2期110-113,共4页
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
基金
广东省科技计划项目(20138021800029)