期刊文献+

城市低频环境噪声烦恼度研究 被引量:1

Study on the subjective annoyance rating of urban low frequency noise
下载PDF
导出
摘要 噪声对人的影响程度不但与它的响度大小有关,而且和它的频率高低有关。当前城市噪声源中有相当一部分为低频噪声,其对人的影响具有与通常的中高频噪声不同的特点。为分析噪声频率与烦恼度的关系,进行了8个不同频率的纯音在等响度级情况下的主观烦恼度的影响研究,由17位实验评价者对4组不同等响度级的纯音所引起的烦恼程度进行了成对比较评价,对评估矩阵进行误差分析和有效性的统计分析。结果显示,等响度级条件下,在63~250 Hz的低频段,烦恼度随着频率的升高而降低;而在1 000~8 000 Hz的中高频段,烦恼度则随着频率的升高而增大;评价者对中高频声的烦恼反应要高于低频声,但低频段的烦恼影响仍不可忽视。 Besides the loudness, the noise frequency also played an important role in the annoyance. Currently, lots of urban noises were low frequency noises. In order to analyze the relationship between noise frequency and annoyance, a pair- wise comparison experiment was carried out to evaluate the subjective annoyance rating of pure tones at different frequency with the same loudness level. Eight pure tones were used as sound samples. And their loudness was adjusted at four levels. A total of 17 volunteers took part in the experiment. Based on the assessment of judging errors and statistical va- lidity analysis of each subjects" evaluation matrix, the results indicated that with the same loudness level, from 63Hz to 250Hz, the annoyance level declined with the increment of pure frequency, but from 1000Hz to 8000Hz, the relationship was reversed. Although the pure tones at high and median frequencies could make larger annoyance than that at low frequencies, however, the influence of low frequencies also could not be ignored.
出处 《环保科技》 2015年第1期12-15,共4页 Environmental Protection and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(10474084)
关键词 低频 烦恼度 响度 low frequency annoyance level loudness
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Broner N. Considerations in the Rating and Assessment of Low - frequency Noise[J]. ASHRAET ransactions, 1993, 9(2) : 1025 - 1030.
  • 2Mirowska M. An Investigation and Assessment of Annoy- ante of Low Frequency noise in Dwellings [ J ]. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control, 1998, 17(3) : 119 - 126.
  • 3Mirowska M. Evaluation of Low - Frequency Noise in Dwellings. New Polish Recommendations [ J ]. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control, 2001, 20(2) : 67 -74.
  • 4Holmberg K, Londstrom U, Kjellberg A. Low Frequency Noise Level Variations and Annoyance in Working Environ- ments [J]. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibration and Active Control, 1997, 16(2):81-87.
  • 5Lundq,List P, Halmberg X, Landstrom U. Low Frequency Noise and Annoyance ;n Classroom [ J ]. Journal of Low Frequency Noise Vibcation and Active Control, 2000, 19 (4) : 175 - 182.
  • 6Kjellberg A, Landstrom U, Tesarz M, et al. The effects of nonphysical noise characteristics ongoing task and noise sensitivity on annoyance and distraction due to noise at work[J]; Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1996, 16 (2) : 123 - 136.
  • 7Person K, Bengtsson J, Kjellberg A, et al. Low frequency "noise pollution" interferes with performance [J]. Noise and health, 2001,4 : 33 - 49.
  • 8Penton S. Current low frequency noise (LFN) assessment guidelines and their use in environmental noise impact as- sessment[J]. Canadian Acoustics Acoustique Canadienne, 2002, 30(3): 78-79.
  • 9翟国庆,张邦俊,童美萍.室内窄频带低频噪声烦恼度与治理对策研究[J].浙江大学学报(理学版),2002,29(1):87-93. 被引量:26
  • 10Otto N , Amman S, Eaton C, et al,. Guidelines for jury e- valuations of automotive sounds [ J ]. Sound and Vibra- tion, 35 (4) :426 - 429.

二级参考文献15

  • 1潘仲麟,黄有兴,金进生,张邦俊,胡伟,纪伟昌.公园环境噪声的主观反应及烦恼度阈值[J].声学学报,1993,18(6):463-467. 被引量:13
  • 2毛东兴,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质成对比较主观评价的数据检验及判据[J].声学学报,2005,30(5):468-472. 被引量:71
  • 3毛东兴,高亚丽,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质主观评价的分组成对比较法研究[J].声学学报,2005,30(6):515-520. 被引量:55
  • 4Blauert J, Jekosch U. Sound quality evaluation - a multilayered problem. Acta Acustica, 1997; 83(3): 747-753.
  • 5Fastl H. The psychoacoustics of sound-quality evaluation.Acta Acustica, 1997; 83(3): 754-764.
  • 6Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics: Facts and models(2nd Edition). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1999.
  • 7Otto N et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds. Proceeding of the 1999 Noise and Vibration Conference, Traverse City, Michigan, USA, 1999. SAE Paper No.1999-01-1822.
  • 8Kendall M G, Smith B B. On the method of paired comparisons. Biometvika, 1940; 31(3/4): 324-345.
  • 9Kendall M G. Further contributions to the theory of paired comparisons. Biometrics, 1955; 11(1): 43-62.
  • 10Weber R. Interior car sound quality-assessment of acceleration noises. 2nd Forum Acusticum, Berlin, Germany,1999.

共引文献97

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部