期刊文献+

基于人力资本竞优结构的“团队-作业对象”匹配决策模型 被引量:14

“Team-working Object”Matching Model Based on Human Capital Competition for Optimal First Structure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对具有相同职称、学历、年龄、性别等人力资本结构的团队在物资资本投入相同的情况下绩效有别的现象,提出团队人力资本竞优结构的概念、测量模型及团队与作业对象的匹配决策方法。团队人力资本竞优结构能够从单项指标优势度和多指标强弱结构效应两方面体现优势。以团队为整体,从最大程度认可团队价值出发,基于目标规划导引模型,构建团队人力资本竞优结构测量方法,揭示团队人力资本内质差异及其优势特征。在匹配决策中,将显性结构与隐性结构相结合,显性结构作为是否胜任的判据;以隐性的竞优结构相似度为切入点,构建"团队-作业对象"多目标多指标匹配优化模型,实现团队尽其才、资源尽其用的团队指派。通过算例,证明了方法的有效性和可行性。 Traditional "team-working objects"matching methods assume that team actual and working objects needing capacity are homogeneous,which can not reflect the needs of adopting strengths and avoiding shortcomings. The teams with the same human capital structures composed of title,education,age,gender and other demographical variables usually have different performances in spite of equal material capital and other resource inputs. In order to ensure that human capital structure reflects the essence of team value creation,it is different from the existing team evaluation method according to human capital structure which focuses on demographic characteristics. The paper presents the concept about optimal team human capital structure competition,which focuses on the nature of value creation elements and people-orientation,with the maximum degree of admitted team value as the prerequisite. In order to measure the advantages and disadvantages of the team,the identification model of team human capital structure competition optimal is constructed. The identification model regards the team as a whole through distance function with goal guiding. The model appreciates the value of the team to the most degree as the starting point,and uses value parameters as decision making variables according to the optimization method. The identification model is constructed. It can be used for quantitatively comparing the advantages and disadvantages according to the team self.Different working objects have different preferences for human capital team structures in order to carry out the advantage structure consistency between teams and working objects. Working objects' human capital ideal structure is formed according to AHP method.Teams' advantage structure is formed off the identification model of competition for optimal structure of team human capital. This study adopts the human capital indicators as the breakthrough point based on the multi-objective optimization method,the multi-indicator optimization method,and the fuzzy mathematics principle through the zero-one integer programming assignment model.This paper proposes the "team-working object"bilateral matching decision model based on competition for optimal structure of team human capital. Combining the explicit structure with the implicit structure,the explicit structure can be used for identifying the competency for jobs; the implicit structure can be used for decision making reference. The "team-working objects"matching decision model is proposed from the perspective of whole optimization. The model considers the team strengths,makes the best use of resources,and has significant working object assignments. The calculation example shows the feasibility and validity of the method.This method is an exploratory research by combining the optimization method of natural science with humanities. From the perspective of advantage structure,this study combines psychological behavior demand with the resources of the optimization model.The structure enriches the actual research background of matching and broadening the human capital structure research.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期1-7,共7页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70971016 71271048) 中国博士后基金资助项目(2012M511153) 辽宁省社会科学规划基金(L11BRK005) 辽宁省教育厅资助项目(W2012045)
关键词 团队人力资本竞优结构 “团队-作业对象”匹配决策 结构相似度 测量方法 显性与隐性结构相结合 competition for optimal first structure of team human capital "team-working object " matching decision structure similarity measurement method explicit and implicit structure combination
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Sethuraman J, Ten C P, Qian L W. Many-to-one stable matching: geometry and fairness [ J 1 - Mathematics of Operations Research, 2006, 31(3): 581 -596.
  • 2马卫华,刘佳,樊霞.产学研合作对学术团队建设影响的实证研究——团队特征差异的调节效应检验[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(2):42-47. 被引量:8
  • 3Karen A. Bantel, Susan E. J. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? [ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989,10 ( SI ) : 107 - 124.
  • 4赵占西,王小妍,于洽.人机工程学应用研究综述[J].人类工效学,2009,15(4):69-71. 被引量:18
  • 5Kristof A L etal. When opposites attract: A multi-sample demonstration of complementary person-team fit on extraversion [ J ]. Journal of Personality,2005 ( 73 ) :935 : 958.
  • 6孙锐,李海刚,石金涛.知识型团队动态能力构建、团队体系模型与创新运作模式研究[J].南开管理评论,2007,10(4):4-10. 被引量:28
  • 7Laszlo T,Alan E. E,Catherine M. Daily,Dan R. Dalton. Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification[ J ]. Journal of Management,2000,26 ( 6 ) : 1157 - 1177.
  • 8Sally A C. Person-job fit versus pemon-organization as predicators of organization attraction and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal and job acceptance intentions: A longitudinal study [J ]. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2005,78 (3) :411 - 430.
  • 9Werbel J D, Johnson D J. The use of person-group fit for employment selection: A missing link in person-environment fit [J]. Human Resource Management,2001 (40) :227 :240.
  • 10Hoffman B J,Woehr D J. A quantitative review of the relationship between person-organization fit and behavioral outcomes [ J ]. Journal of Vocational Behavior,2006,68 ( 3 ) :389 : 399.

二级参考文献87

共引文献60

同被引文献146

引证文献14

二级引证文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部