期刊文献+

基于知识贡献考核和效用的组织个体知识共享博弈分析与仿真 被引量:7

Games Analysis and Simulation in Knowledge Sharing based on Knowledge Contribution Assessment and Utility among Organizational Employees
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文综合考虑了组织个体在组织知识管理策略——知识贡献绩效考核影响下的个体知识共享行为,建立个体在管理策略动态变化下的共享行为模型,将个体知识共享演化的变化抽象为一个博弈过程,分析纳什均衡存在,构建组织个体知识共享效用函数,综合分析在组织知识贡献考核及个体效用双重条件下,个体知识共享博弈后不会出现"搭便车"现象。在此基础上,进行仿真模拟,探讨组织知识共享与组织激励投入、激励程度、激励差异化及个体效用差异的影响规律。本研究将为组织知识管理策略的制定和控制提供理论依据和指导。 Companies are competing on knowledge as the source of innovation for competitive advantages. Knowledge sharing between employees can greatly enhance an organization's ability to innovate. Many knowledge sharing researches have focused on employee attitudes toward sharing knowledge with others,"free rider"problems,and trust between employees,etc. However,little research about how knowledge assessment has contributed to knowledge sharing has been done.A model is established to describe game processing under management strategies,and analyze the existence of Nash equilibrium.We also propose that there will not be "free rider"phenomenon if the assessment of knowledge contribution is considered. Knowledge sharing activities are discussed according to an employee effect function.First,a knowledge sharing game model is established after considering the assessment of knowledge contribution. In addition,an employee utility function is analyzed based on two factors: knowledge devotion and obtaining. Based on the above analysis,we conclude that evaluation of employee knowledge contribution will change employee's "free rider"behaviors of knowledge sharing.The second section discusses the relationship between employee utility function and knowledge sharing effect. Employees who devote more will contribute more if he or she obtains more knowledge from the knowledge sharing process. Simulation analysis shows the relationships among organizational knowledge sharing,organizational investment incentives,incentive levels,incentive differentiation,and individual effectiveness differences. When the absolute index values of two factors are almost equal,each individual will try to make contributions to the knowledge sharing process.In summary,knowledge sharing is affected by many factors,such as organizational incentives,individual characteristics,and so on. An organization needs to provide these factors to support its knowledge sharing activities.
出处 《管理工程学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期216-222,共7页 Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基金 上海哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目(2013EGL011) 国家软科学资助项目(2011GXQ4D089) 科技部863项目子课题资助项目(2014AA052501)
关键词 知识贡献 知识共享 博弈 效用 knowledge contribution knowledge sharing game analysis utility
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1乐承毅,徐福缘,顾新建,潘凯,代风,彭本红.企业员工知识贡献度评价模型及算法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(3):662-671. 被引量:12
  • 2Hirschfeld RR, Jordan MH, et al. Becoming team players: Team members'mastery of teamwork knowledge as a predictor of team task proficiency and observed teamwork effectiveness[ J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91(2): 467-474.
  • 3Jenifer W. Spencer. Firms knowledge- sharing Strategies in the Global Innovation System: Empirical Evidence From the Flat Panel Display Industry[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003 (24) : 217 -233.
  • 4S. Ba J. Stallaert AB. Whinston. Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design - the case for incentive alignment [ J]. Information Systems Research, 2001,12(3) : 225 -239.
  • 5Cabrera EF, Cabrera A. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management pactices[J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management,2005,16 (5) :720 - 735.
  • 6Constant D, Kiesler S, Sproull L. What's mine is ours or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing [ J ]. Information Systems Research 1994,5 (4) : 400 - 421.
  • 7Cabrera EF, Cabrera A. Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices[ J]. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2005,16 ( 5 ) :720 : 735.
  • 8李富强,葛新权,吴永林.知识共享的企业知识管理系统[J].中国软科学,2002(10):56-59. 被引量:41
  • 9樊治平,孙永洪.知识共享研究综述[J].管理学报,2006,3(3):371-378. 被引量:117
  • 10Cabrera A, Cabrera EF. Knowledge-sharing dilemmas [ J ]. Organization Studies, 2002, 23 (5) : 687 - 710.

二级参考文献184

共引文献588

同被引文献74

引证文献7

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部