期刊文献+

艰难梭菌实验室快速鉴定方法检验效能的比较 被引量:6

Laboratory methods for rapid identification of Clostridium difficile: a comparison of the test efficiency
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价3种艰难梭菌实验室鉴定方法的快速性及准确性。方法 2013年6月至2013年11月,收集136名ICU患者共248份标本进行24 h、48 h厌氧培养,并进行鉴定,同时对大便标本提取DNA进行tcd B毒素基因检测。以48 h培养结果为参考标准,评价24小时培养法和PCR扩增tcd B基因法鉴定艰难梭菌的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果 136名ICU发生腹泻的患者中,11名患者共有12份标本48 h培养为艰难梭菌阳性,艰难梭菌感染率为8.09%(11/136),标本阳性率为4.84%(12/248)。24小时培养法及PCR扩增tcd B基因法的灵敏度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为75.00%、100%、100%、98.74%和83.33%、99.15%、83.33%、99.15%。结论提取大便DNA tcd B毒素基因是最快速、灵敏度和特异度均较高的方法;48小时培养法时间相对较长,但稳定可靠,并可以保留菌株进行后续试验;24小时培养法,时间短、简便但会漏诊某些阳性病例。 Objective To identify the fastest and most accurate method among three laboratory methods for identification of Clostridium difficile. Methods 248 stool specimens from 136 ICU inpatients during June and November2013 were collected and cultured for anaerobic bacteria for 24 hours and 48 hours respectively. DNA was extracted from the stool specimens for tcd B gene detection. Based on the result of 48-hour culture method,the sensitivity,specificity and positive and negative predictive values of 24-hour culture and those of PCR amplification of tcd B gene were evaluated. Results Among the 136 ICU patients with diarrhea,11 patients with a total of 12 specimens were found positive for Clostridium difficile after 48 hours. The rate of Clostridium difficile infection( CDI) was8. 09%( 11 /136); 4. 84%( 12 /248) of the stool specimens were found positive for Clostridium difficile. The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 75. 00%,100%,100% and98. 74% for the 24-hour culture method and 83. 33%,99. 15%,83. 33%,99. 15% for tcd B gene PCR amplification method. Conclusion The stool DNA extraction for tcd B testing is the most rapid method with higher sensitivity and specificity. The 48-hour culture medthod takes more time but the results are consistent and reliable,and the strains can be preserved for following experiments. The 24-hour culture method is simple and takes less time,but may miss some positive cases.
出处 《中国微生态学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2015年第1期98-101,共4页 Chinese Journal of Microecology
基金 湖南省科技厅项目(2012SK3200) 中美新发和再发传染病合作项目(5U2GGH000018)
关键词 艰难梭菌 艰难梭菌相关性腹泻 艰难梭菌感染 tcdB 快速诊断 Clostridium difficile Clostridium difficile assocoated diarrhea Clostridium difficile infection Rapid diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kuijper EJ, Coignard B, Brazier JS, et al. Update of Clostridium difficile-associated disease due to PCR ribotype 027 in Europe [ J ]. Euro Surveillance, 2007, 12(6): El-2.
  • 2McDonald LC. Clostridium difficile: responding to a new threat from an old enemy[ J]. Infect Control & Hosp Epidemiol, 2005, 26 (8) : 672-675.
  • 3PerssonS, Jensen JN, Olsen KE. Multiplex PCR method for detec- tion of Clostridium diffwile tedA, tedB, edtA, and cdtB and inter- nal in-frame deletion of tedC [ J ]. J Clin Mierobiol, 2011, 49 (12) : 4299-4300.
  • 4Kato H, Kato N, Watanabe K, et al. Identification of toxin A-neg- ative, toxin B-positive Clostridium dlfficile by PCR [ J ]. J Cliu Mi- erobiol, 1998, 36(8): 2178-2182.
  • 5Bauer MP, Notermans DW, van Benthem BH, et al. Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey [ J ]. Lancet, 2011, 377(9759) : 63-73.
  • 6Magill SS, Edwards JR, Bamberg W, et al. Multistate point-preva- lence survey of health care-associated infections[ J]. NEJM, 2014, 370(13) : 1198-1208.
  • 7Rieeiardi R, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, et al. Increasing prev- alence and severity of Clostridium dicile colitis in hospitalized pa- tients in the United States [ J ]. Arch Surg, 2007, 142 (7) : 624- 631.
  • 8Planehe T, Wilcox M. Reference assays for Clostridium diffwile in- fection: one or two gold standards? [J]. J Clin Pathol, 2011, 64 (1) : 1-5.

同被引文献26

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部