期刊文献+

在科学与政治之间:重新发现纽拉特 被引量:4

Between Science and Politics: Rediscovering Neurath
原文传递
导出
摘要 近年来兴起的对左翼维也纳学派的研究,主要集中在逻辑经验主义的政治学维度上。要深入理解左翼维也纳学派,须重新发现纽拉特的科学政治学,分析统一科学运动的政治蕴含。纽拉特对于科学与政治的基本规划至少包含了:科学与政治是同构的;科学应作为中立的工具服务于人类福祉;科学可以为民主政治提供样板。统一科学运动在推进科学民主化、对抗极权主义、倡导自由主义政治对话方面具有积极意义。这些科学政治学思想对后世的科学哲学及STS的很多研究方向有重要的预见性。 Recent scholarship resuscitates the history and philosophy of a 'left wing' in the Vienna Circle, offering acounterhistory to the conventional image of analytic philosophy as politic ally conformist.In order to have a deeper understanding of the Left Vienna Circle,we need to rediscover Neu- rath's politics of science,and analyze the political implication of the Unity of Science Movement.Neurath's understanding of science and politics in- eludes at least three aspects: science and politics are isomorphic; science should serve as a neutral tool for human well-being; science can provide a model for democracy. Unity of Science Movement has positive significance in promoting the democratization of science, against totalitarianism, advo- cating liberal political dialogue. These thinking from the polities of science has important predictability on the later research of philosophy of scienceand STS.
作者 白惠仁
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期80-85,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 左翼维也纳学派 纽拉特 科学政治学 统一科学运动 the Left Vienna Circle Neurath the politics of science the Unity of Science Movement
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1M.W.瓦托夫斯基,岳长龄.维也纳学派和社会运动[J].世界哲学,1985(2):69-74. 被引量:7
  • 2Don Howard. Better Red than Dead-Putting an End to the Social Irrelevance of Postwar Philosophy of Science [J]. Sci- ence & Education, 2009(2) : 199-220.
  • 3Alan Richardson. But what then am I, this inexhaustible, un- fathomable historical self?. Or, upon what ground may one commit empiricism?[J]. Synthese, 2011(1) : 143-154.
  • 4George A Reisch. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • 5Uebel, T. E. Political philosophy of science in logical empiri- cism: The left Vienna Circle [J]. Studies in History and Phi- losophy of Science, 2005,36: 750-772.
  • 6Cartwright, N., Cat, J., & Chang, C. Otto Neurath: Politics and the unity of science[M]//P. Galison, & D. Stump. The Disunity of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
  • 7Horkheimer, M. Der Neueste Angriffe auf die Metaphysik[M]. Zeitschrift ftlr Sozialforschung. New York: Herder & Herder, 1972.
  • 8Hayek, F. A. The counter-revolution of science[M]. Economi- ca. Indianapolis:Liberty, 1979.
  • 9Popper, K. The poverty of historicism[M]. London: Routledge, 1986.
  • 10金砚,蔡仲.冷战与“统一科学运动”的终结[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(12):16-21. 被引量:1

二级参考文献31

  • 1O.纽拉特,王玉北.科学的世界观:维也纳小组——献给石里克[J].世界哲学,1994(1):36-44. 被引量:19
  • 2爱因斯坦.爱因斯坦文集第一卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1976.
  • 3Michael Frieldman, History and Philosophy of Science in A New Key[J].ISIS, March 2008.
  • 4Chislett Clive. 1992. "Damned Lies. and Statistics: Otto Neurath and Soviet Propaganda in the 1930s. " Visible Language 26: 298-321.
  • 5Neurath Otto. Personal Life and Class Struggle[C]. In Neurath, 1973.
  • 6Reisch. The Cultural Significance of Science: An Unpublished Lecture by Charles Morris [J]. RS/SI, 2001,21.
  • 7Stadler Friedrich. The Vienna Circle: Studies in the Origins, Development, and Influence of Logical Empiricism[J]. Vienna: Springer Verlag. 2001.
  • 8Frank Philipp. Modern Science and Its Philosophy [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1949.
  • 9Morris Charles. On the History of the International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. [J].Synthese, 1960,12.
  • 10George A Reisch. How the Cold War Transformed Philosophy of Science [M]. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

共引文献10

同被引文献38

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部