期刊文献+

中学《历史与社会》课程内容建构方式比较分析

Contrastive Analysis of the Construction Methods of the Course Content of History and Society in Middle Schools
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从内容建构思路及标准、主题轴以及建构理论依据三方面对我国中学《历史与社会》课程内容建构方式进行了比较分析。研究结果显示:不同课标在课程内容建构的思路及标准上明显不同;不同课标主题轴数量和内容有很大差异;从建构理论上看,"课标(一)"内容建构遵循了空间的顺序;"课标(二)"在空间基础上增加了时间维度;"上海课标"体现出以学科综合为中心的特点;而"2011版课标"围绕社会问题为中心构建课程内容。 From the perspectives of idea and standard for content construction,theme axis and construction theory,the paper makes a contrastive analysis of the construction methods of the course content of History and Societyin the middle schools in our country.The study shows that:each course-standard is significantly different from each other in the idea and standard of content construction;different course standards diverge greatly in the number and content of theme axis;in terms of construction theory," Course Standard1"follows the sequence of space and Course Standard 2" adds time dimension to space dimension;The" Course Standard of Shanghai" is featured by the priority given to course integration;" Course Standard in 2011" constructs its course content based on social issues.
出处 《贵州师范学院学报》 2015年第1期82-84,共3页 Journal of Guizhou Education University
关键词 《历史与社会》 课程内容 建构方式 主题轴 History and Society Course Content Construction Method Theme Axis
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献73

  • 1秦麟征.跨学科研究的未来[J].国外社会科学,1996(1):21-26. 被引量:7
  • 2[美]巴格莱著 袁桂林译.教育与新人[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1996..
  • 3E. Wayne Ross. The Social Studies Curriculum[M]. New York: State University of New York, 2001:20 - 21,93,22 - 24.
  • 4Jock Zevin. Social Studies For The Twenty - First Century[M]. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. , 2000: 20 - 21.
  • 5J. Lloyd Trump, Delmas F. Miller. Secondary School Curriculum Improvement: Meeting Challenges of the Times, Allyn and Bacon, Inc. , 1979:234-251.
  • 6National Council for the Social Studies. Curriculum Standards for Social Studies: Expectation for Excellence[M]. Maryland: NCSS, 2001:221 - 232,2 - 5.
  • 7Loretta Sullivan Lobes. Surveying State Standards: National History Education Network' s 1997 Report On State Social Studies Standards [J ]. The History Teacher, 1998, 31(2) :221 - 232,227 - 228.
  • 8中国台湾地区“教育部”.国民中小学九年一贯课程暂行纲要·社会学习领域[M].中国台北:中国台湾地区“教育部”,2001.
  • 9Anna S. Ochoa - Beeker. A Critique of the NCSS Curriculum Standards[J]. Social Education, 2001, 65(3) : 165.
  • 10David J. Rutherford, Richard G. Boehm. Round Two: Standards Writing and Implementation in the Social Studies. The Social Studies, 2004 95(6) :231 - 237,231 - 237.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部