期刊文献+

经尿道等离子电切术治疗前列腺增生患者疗效分析 被引量:10

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道等离子电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2013年12月295例采用等离子电切术治疗BPH患者的临床资料。结果术后随访12-24个月。国际前列腺症状评分(I-PSS),生活质量评分(QOL),残余尿量,手术前后比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论TURP切除前列腺较彻底,无电切综合征(TURS),并发症少,安全性高,是BPH手术治疗较为理想的方法。 Objectiv To review the clinical efficacy of treatment for transurethral plasma kinetic resection. Methods A total of 295 patients with BPH were enrolled from January 2008 to December 2013, who undergone transurethral plasma kinetic resection. Results Follow-up 12-24months after PKRP operation, International prostate symptom scores ( I-PSS ) , Quality of life scores ( QOL ) , Maximum urinary flow rates ( Qmax ) and Residual urine volume ( RUV ) , were compared to evaluate the clinical effect between pre-operative and post-operative, and there was significantly difference between them.Conclusions PKRP operation is a better prostatectomy for BPH, because of benign prostate tissue resected thoroughly, lower postoperative morbidity rate and higher security.
出处 《浙江临床医学》 2015年第1期39-40,共2页 Zhejiang Clinical Medical Journal
关键词 良性前列腺增生症 经尿道前列腺电切术 经尿道等离子电切术 Benign prostatic hyperplasia Transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献32

  • 1王怀鹏,王行环,陈浩阳,刘久敏,罗耀雄,冯自卫.经尿道等离子双极电切治疗良性前列腺增生600例报告[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2005,10(1):22-24. 被引量:74
  • 2刘定益,顾炯,王健,唐崎,周燕峰,李汝松,祝宇.经尿道等离子体双极电切术治疗前列腺增生[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2005,20(5):269-270. 被引量:63
  • 3王行环,瞿利军.经尿道前列腺等离子双极汽化术和电切术[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2006,21(7):481-483. 被引量:48
  • 4Borborglu PG, Kane CJ, Ward JF, et al. Immediate and postoperative complications of transm'ethral prostatectomy in 1990s. J Urol, 1999, 162 (4) : 1307 - 1310.
  • 5ErturhanS, Erbagci A, Seckiner I, et al. Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1 - year follow - up. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 21307, 10(1):97- 100.
  • 6Akcayoz M, Kaygisiz O, Akdemir O, et al. Comparison of transurethral resection and plasmakinetic transurethral resection applications with regard to fluid absorption amounts in benign prostate hyperplasia. Urol Int, 2006, 77(2) : 143-147.
  • 7Patankar S, Jamkar A, Dobhada S, et al. PlasmaKinetic Superpulse transurethral resection versus conventionaltransurethral resection of prostate. J Endourol, 2006, 20(3) :215 - 219.
  • 8Nulloglu B, A vyildiz A, Karaguzel E, et al. Plasmakinetic prostate resection in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia: results of 1 - year fol- low up. Int J Urol, 2006, 13(1) :21 - 24.
  • 9Qu L, Wang X, Huang X, et al. Use of a novel ex - vivo model to compare the hemostatic properties of plasmakinetic resection, transurethral vaporization resection and conventional transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology, 2007, 70(5): 1034- 1038.
  • 10de Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G, et al. Gyms bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospectivetrial. Urology, 2006, 67(1) :69 -72.

共引文献50

同被引文献68

引证文献10

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部